Cargando…

Sustainability assessment of agricultural rainwater harvesting: Evaluation of alternative crop types and irrigation practices

Rainwater harvesting (RWH) has been used globally to address water scarcity for various ecosystem uses, including crop irrigation requirements, and to meet the water resource needs of a growing world population. However, the costs, benefits and impacts of alternative crop types and irrigation practi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghimire, Santosh R., Johnston, John M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31075147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216452
_version_ 1783417418963484672
author Ghimire, Santosh R.
Johnston, John M.
author_facet Ghimire, Santosh R.
Johnston, John M.
author_sort Ghimire, Santosh R.
collection PubMed
description Rainwater harvesting (RWH) has been used globally to address water scarcity for various ecosystem uses, including crop irrigation requirements, and to meet the water resource needs of a growing world population. However, the costs, benefits and impacts of alternative crop types and irrigation practices is challenging to evaluate comprehensively. We present an assessment methodology to evaluate the sustainability of agricultural systems as applied to a southeastern U.S. river basin. We utilized detailed, crop-level cultivation information to calculate sustainability indicators (relative to well-water irrigation) at the basin scale (6-digit Hydrologic Unit Codes). 40 design configurations comprising crop types and irrigation practices were evaluated to demonstrate the methodology’s robustness. Four RWH designs and four major crops (pasture-grass, soybeans, corn, and cotton) resembling current practices were evaluated, as well as six combined systems (combined RWH and well-water systems) with four globally representative crops (corn, soybeans, wheat, and quinoa). Sustainability scores were calculated by integrating seven life cycle impact indicators (cumulative energy demand, CO(2) emission, blue water use, ecotoxicity, eutrophication, human health-cancer, and life cycle costs). At a basin-wide RWH adoption rate of 25%, the benefits, relative to 100% well-water, of the RWH systems irrigating soybeans and supported with well-water (0.4 well-water: 0.6 RWH) provided cumulative energy savings of 39 Peta Joule and reductions in CO(2) emission, blue water use, ecotoxicity, eutrophication, and human health-cancer at 1.9 Mt CO(2) eq., 6.9 Gm(3), 5.7 MCTU, 6.6 kt N eq., and 0.07 CTU, respectively. These benefits increased linearly with RWH scaling variables including the adoption rates, system service life, crop area, and water needs. Our methodology integrates the three pillars of agricultural sustainability specific to rainwater harvesting into a single score. It is applicable to other locations worldwide facing water scarcity by modifying the RWH system design, selecting other crop types, and obtaining appropriate data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6510416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65104162019-05-23 Sustainability assessment of agricultural rainwater harvesting: Evaluation of alternative crop types and irrigation practices Ghimire, Santosh R. Johnston, John M. PLoS One Research Article Rainwater harvesting (RWH) has been used globally to address water scarcity for various ecosystem uses, including crop irrigation requirements, and to meet the water resource needs of a growing world population. However, the costs, benefits and impacts of alternative crop types and irrigation practices is challenging to evaluate comprehensively. We present an assessment methodology to evaluate the sustainability of agricultural systems as applied to a southeastern U.S. river basin. We utilized detailed, crop-level cultivation information to calculate sustainability indicators (relative to well-water irrigation) at the basin scale (6-digit Hydrologic Unit Codes). 40 design configurations comprising crop types and irrigation practices were evaluated to demonstrate the methodology’s robustness. Four RWH designs and four major crops (pasture-grass, soybeans, corn, and cotton) resembling current practices were evaluated, as well as six combined systems (combined RWH and well-water systems) with four globally representative crops (corn, soybeans, wheat, and quinoa). Sustainability scores were calculated by integrating seven life cycle impact indicators (cumulative energy demand, CO(2) emission, blue water use, ecotoxicity, eutrophication, human health-cancer, and life cycle costs). At a basin-wide RWH adoption rate of 25%, the benefits, relative to 100% well-water, of the RWH systems irrigating soybeans and supported with well-water (0.4 well-water: 0.6 RWH) provided cumulative energy savings of 39 Peta Joule and reductions in CO(2) emission, blue water use, ecotoxicity, eutrophication, and human health-cancer at 1.9 Mt CO(2) eq., 6.9 Gm(3), 5.7 MCTU, 6.6 kt N eq., and 0.07 CTU, respectively. These benefits increased linearly with RWH scaling variables including the adoption rates, system service life, crop area, and water needs. Our methodology integrates the three pillars of agricultural sustainability specific to rainwater harvesting into a single score. It is applicable to other locations worldwide facing water scarcity by modifying the RWH system design, selecting other crop types, and obtaining appropriate data. Public Library of Science 2019-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6510416/ /pubmed/31075147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216452 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ghimire, Santosh R.
Johnston, John M.
Sustainability assessment of agricultural rainwater harvesting: Evaluation of alternative crop types and irrigation practices
title Sustainability assessment of agricultural rainwater harvesting: Evaluation of alternative crop types and irrigation practices
title_full Sustainability assessment of agricultural rainwater harvesting: Evaluation of alternative crop types and irrigation practices
title_fullStr Sustainability assessment of agricultural rainwater harvesting: Evaluation of alternative crop types and irrigation practices
title_full_unstemmed Sustainability assessment of agricultural rainwater harvesting: Evaluation of alternative crop types and irrigation practices
title_short Sustainability assessment of agricultural rainwater harvesting: Evaluation of alternative crop types and irrigation practices
title_sort sustainability assessment of agricultural rainwater harvesting: evaluation of alternative crop types and irrigation practices
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31075147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216452
work_keys_str_mv AT ghimiresantoshr sustainabilityassessmentofagriculturalrainwaterharvestingevaluationofalternativecroptypesandirrigationpractices
AT johnstonjohnm sustainabilityassessmentofagriculturalrainwaterharvestingevaluationofalternativecroptypesandirrigationpractices