Cargando…

Can a standards-based approach improve access to and quality of primary health care? Findings from an end-of-project evaluation in Ghana

BACKGROUND: Jhpiego implemented a 5-year project to strengthen the Community-Based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) model in six coastal districts of Ghana’s Western Region. The project utilized a quality improvement approach (Standards-Based Management and Recognition [SBM-R]) to strengthen impl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maly, Christina, Okyere Boadu, Richard, Rosado, Carina, Lailari, Aliza, Vikpeh-Lartey, Bernard, Allen, Chantelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31075150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216589
_version_ 1783417422226653184
author Maly, Christina
Okyere Boadu, Richard
Rosado, Carina
Lailari, Aliza
Vikpeh-Lartey, Bernard
Allen, Chantelle
author_facet Maly, Christina
Okyere Boadu, Richard
Rosado, Carina
Lailari, Aliza
Vikpeh-Lartey, Bernard
Allen, Chantelle
author_sort Maly, Christina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Jhpiego implemented a 5-year project to strengthen the Community-Based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) model in six coastal districts of Ghana’s Western Region. The project utilized a quality improvement approach (Standards-Based Management and Recognition [SBM-R]) to strengthen implementation fidelity of the CHPS model. This article presents findings from an end-of-project evaluation comparing quality, access to care, and experience of care in intervention and comparison CHPS zones. METHODS: A non-equivalent, posttest–only, end-of-project evaluation compared 12 randomly selected intervention zones with 12 matched comparison zones. Data from standards-based assessments measured provision of care in three categories: community engagement, clinical services, and facility readiness and management. Access to and experience of care were assessed using a household survey of 426 randomly selected community members from the selected CHPS zones. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to compare performance on these measures between intervention and comparison CHPS zones. RESULTS: Overall, intervention zones outperformed comparison zones on achievement of standards (83.6% vs 58.8%) across all three assessment categories, with strongest results in community engagement (85.7% vs. 41.4%). Respondents in intervention zones were more than twice as likely to have received a home visit from a community health officer, three times as likely to have a home visit from a community health volunteer, and more likely to have attended a health talk (41.9% vs. 27.0%). Client experiences of care were reported as positive in both study arms. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation demonstrated improved access to quality care; however, there were very few differences in client experience of care between intervention and comparison zones. As Ghana and other countries are committed to scaling up universal health care, a pragmatic approach such as SBM-R could prove useful to engage both facility- and community-based service providers, as well as community members, to improve provision of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6510430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65104302019-05-23 Can a standards-based approach improve access to and quality of primary health care? Findings from an end-of-project evaluation in Ghana Maly, Christina Okyere Boadu, Richard Rosado, Carina Lailari, Aliza Vikpeh-Lartey, Bernard Allen, Chantelle PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Jhpiego implemented a 5-year project to strengthen the Community-Based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) model in six coastal districts of Ghana’s Western Region. The project utilized a quality improvement approach (Standards-Based Management and Recognition [SBM-R]) to strengthen implementation fidelity of the CHPS model. This article presents findings from an end-of-project evaluation comparing quality, access to care, and experience of care in intervention and comparison CHPS zones. METHODS: A non-equivalent, posttest–only, end-of-project evaluation compared 12 randomly selected intervention zones with 12 matched comparison zones. Data from standards-based assessments measured provision of care in three categories: community engagement, clinical services, and facility readiness and management. Access to and experience of care were assessed using a household survey of 426 randomly selected community members from the selected CHPS zones. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to compare performance on these measures between intervention and comparison CHPS zones. RESULTS: Overall, intervention zones outperformed comparison zones on achievement of standards (83.6% vs 58.8%) across all three assessment categories, with strongest results in community engagement (85.7% vs. 41.4%). Respondents in intervention zones were more than twice as likely to have received a home visit from a community health officer, three times as likely to have a home visit from a community health volunteer, and more likely to have attended a health talk (41.9% vs. 27.0%). Client experiences of care were reported as positive in both study arms. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation demonstrated improved access to quality care; however, there were very few differences in client experience of care between intervention and comparison zones. As Ghana and other countries are committed to scaling up universal health care, a pragmatic approach such as SBM-R could prove useful to engage both facility- and community-based service providers, as well as community members, to improve provision of care. Public Library of Science 2019-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6510430/ /pubmed/31075150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216589 Text en © 2019 Maly et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Maly, Christina
Okyere Boadu, Richard
Rosado, Carina
Lailari, Aliza
Vikpeh-Lartey, Bernard
Allen, Chantelle
Can a standards-based approach improve access to and quality of primary health care? Findings from an end-of-project evaluation in Ghana
title Can a standards-based approach improve access to and quality of primary health care? Findings from an end-of-project evaluation in Ghana
title_full Can a standards-based approach improve access to and quality of primary health care? Findings from an end-of-project evaluation in Ghana
title_fullStr Can a standards-based approach improve access to and quality of primary health care? Findings from an end-of-project evaluation in Ghana
title_full_unstemmed Can a standards-based approach improve access to and quality of primary health care? Findings from an end-of-project evaluation in Ghana
title_short Can a standards-based approach improve access to and quality of primary health care? Findings from an end-of-project evaluation in Ghana
title_sort can a standards-based approach improve access to and quality of primary health care? findings from an end-of-project evaluation in ghana
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31075150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216589
work_keys_str_mv AT malychristina canastandardsbasedapproachimproveaccesstoandqualityofprimaryhealthcarefindingsfromanendofprojectevaluationinghana
AT okyereboadurichard canastandardsbasedapproachimproveaccesstoandqualityofprimaryhealthcarefindingsfromanendofprojectevaluationinghana
AT rosadocarina canastandardsbasedapproachimproveaccesstoandqualityofprimaryhealthcarefindingsfromanendofprojectevaluationinghana
AT lailarializa canastandardsbasedapproachimproveaccesstoandqualityofprimaryhealthcarefindingsfromanendofprojectevaluationinghana
AT vikpehlarteybernard canastandardsbasedapproachimproveaccesstoandqualityofprimaryhealthcarefindingsfromanendofprojectevaluationinghana
AT allenchantelle canastandardsbasedapproachimproveaccesstoandqualityofprimaryhealthcarefindingsfromanendofprojectevaluationinghana