Cargando…
When Stars Do Not Align: Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings and the Volume-Outcome Association
BACKGROUND: Volume-outcome relationships are well established for coronary artery bypass grafting and total joint arthroplasty surgery. Although the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings program includes outcome quality measures for these proce...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161152 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.18.00044 |
_version_ | 1783417431541153792 |
---|---|
author | Fontana, Mark Alan Lyman, Stephen Islam, Wasif MacLean, Catherine H. |
author_facet | Fontana, Mark Alan Lyman, Stephen Islam, Wasif MacLean, Catherine H. |
author_sort | Fontana, Mark Alan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Volume-outcome relationships are well established for coronary artery bypass grafting and total joint arthroplasty surgery. Although the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings program includes outcome quality measures for these procedures, these outcome quality measures are not counted toward the star ratings for low-volume hospitals. We sought to assess whether excluding low-volume hospitals from surgical quality measures with known volume-outcome relationships affects the star ratings. METHODS: We identified quality measures used in CMS’s star ratings that are related to surgical procedures with a known volume-outcome relationship and tested for the presence of the volume-outcome association for each of these measures. We then imputed missing values for low-volume hospitals for each measure and otherwise identically repeated the CMS calculations in order to assess the percentages of hospitals with the same, better, or worse ratings. RESULTS: Among the measures used to calculate star ratings, we identified 4 quality measures (2 related to coronary artery bypass grafting and 2 related to total joint arthroplasty) with known volume-outcome relationships that were excluded from the calculations of the star ratings for low-volume hospitals. We confirmed a volume-outcome association in the CMS data for all 4 measures. When total joint arthroplasty complications were imputed for low-volume hospitals and then included in the calculation of the star ratings, over one-third of hospitals received a different rating; both low-volume and other hospitals were more often hurt than helped. Imputing the other 3 quality measures among low-volume hospitals left the ratings unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The CMS star ratings do not fully represent the risks of undergoing procedures at low-volume hospitals, potentially misrepresent quality across facilities, and hence are of uncertain utility to consumers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6510470 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65104702019-06-03 When Stars Do Not Align: Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings and the Volume-Outcome Association Fontana, Mark Alan Lyman, Stephen Islam, Wasif MacLean, Catherine H. JB JS Open Access Scientific Articles BACKGROUND: Volume-outcome relationships are well established for coronary artery bypass grafting and total joint arthroplasty surgery. Although the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings program includes outcome quality measures for these procedures, these outcome quality measures are not counted toward the star ratings for low-volume hospitals. We sought to assess whether excluding low-volume hospitals from surgical quality measures with known volume-outcome relationships affects the star ratings. METHODS: We identified quality measures used in CMS’s star ratings that are related to surgical procedures with a known volume-outcome relationship and tested for the presence of the volume-outcome association for each of these measures. We then imputed missing values for low-volume hospitals for each measure and otherwise identically repeated the CMS calculations in order to assess the percentages of hospitals with the same, better, or worse ratings. RESULTS: Among the measures used to calculate star ratings, we identified 4 quality measures (2 related to coronary artery bypass grafting and 2 related to total joint arthroplasty) with known volume-outcome relationships that were excluded from the calculations of the star ratings for low-volume hospitals. We confirmed a volume-outcome association in the CMS data for all 4 measures. When total joint arthroplasty complications were imputed for low-volume hospitals and then included in the calculation of the star ratings, over one-third of hospitals received a different rating; both low-volume and other hospitals were more often hurt than helped. Imputing the other 3 quality measures among low-volume hospitals left the ratings unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The CMS star ratings do not fully represent the risks of undergoing procedures at low-volume hospitals, potentially misrepresent quality across facilities, and hence are of uncertain utility to consumers. Wolters Kluwer 2019-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6510470/ /pubmed/31161152 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.18.00044 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Articles Fontana, Mark Alan Lyman, Stephen Islam, Wasif MacLean, Catherine H. When Stars Do Not Align: Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings and the Volume-Outcome Association |
title | When Stars Do Not Align: Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings and the Volume-Outcome Association |
title_full | When Stars Do Not Align: Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings and the Volume-Outcome Association |
title_fullStr | When Stars Do Not Align: Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings and the Volume-Outcome Association |
title_full_unstemmed | When Stars Do Not Align: Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings and the Volume-Outcome Association |
title_short | When Stars Do Not Align: Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings and the Volume-Outcome Association |
title_sort | when stars do not align: overall hospital quality star ratings and the volume-outcome association |
topic | Scientific Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161152 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.18.00044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fontanamarkalan whenstarsdonotalignoverallhospitalqualitystarratingsandthevolumeoutcomeassociation AT lymanstephen whenstarsdonotalignoverallhospitalqualitystarratingsandthevolumeoutcomeassociation AT islamwasif whenstarsdonotalignoverallhospitalqualitystarratingsandthevolumeoutcomeassociation AT macleancatherineh whenstarsdonotalignoverallhospitalqualitystarratingsandthevolumeoutcomeassociation |