Cargando…
Creation and Piloting of a Model for Simulating a Minimally Invasive Myomectomy
Introduction: In the era of mandatory work hour restrictions for residency programs, the opportunity for mastery of complex surgical skills in the operating room (OR) has been compromised. All the while, gynecologic surgical techniques have continued to expand. Surgical simulation offers an adjuvant...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31123645 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4223 |
Sumario: | Introduction: In the era of mandatory work hour restrictions for residency programs, the opportunity for mastery of complex surgical skills in the operating room (OR) has been compromised. All the while, gynecologic surgical techniques have continued to expand. Surgical simulation offers an adjuvant modality for helping young surgeons hone their surgical techniques. We sought to design, construct, and pilot a model for simulating a minimally invasive myomectomy procedure for the purpose of resident training. We undertook a preliminary evaluation of the model’s validity. Methods: Gynecologic surgical simulation models were constructed from polyvinyl alcohol poured into 3D-printed injection molds. A total of 12 laparoscopic and 12 robot-assisted simulated myomectomies were performed using the models. Face and content validity were evaluated with post-simulation questionnaires. Construct validity was assessed by comparing procedural metrics (time to completion and estimated blood loss) between residents and attending surgeons. Results: In the post-simulation survey, the majority of attending surgeons agreed the model was realistic (83.3%) and included the critical steps of a myomectomy (87.5%). Most residents agreed they would feel more prepared for a myomectomy if they practiced on the model beforehand (87.5%) and the majority of attending surgeons agreed they would feel comfortable giving a resident more operative autonomy if the resident had previously completed the simulation (71.4%). Procedural metrics were not significantly associated with expertise level. Conclusion: We were able to successfully create a model for simulating a minimally invasive myomectomy. Initial simulations using the model were well received by participants. Further development and investigation of the model will be pursued to determine if this is a valid and useful tool for teaching and practicing a minimally invasive myomectomy. |
---|