Cargando…

United States Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) Pathway: Drawing Implications from the Approvals of Brachytherapy Devices

Introduction Innovations in cancer treatment coupled with an increasing number of cancer patients have led to the growth of brachytherapy devices. The objective of this study is to characterize the development and safety of brachytherapy devices marketed in the United States (US) over the last 15 ye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Sophie, Manudhane, Albert, Ezaldein, Harib H, Scott, Jeffrey F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31123652
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4230
_version_ 1783417441224753152
author Wang, Sophie
Manudhane, Albert
Ezaldein, Harib H
Scott, Jeffrey F
author_facet Wang, Sophie
Manudhane, Albert
Ezaldein, Harib H
Scott, Jeffrey F
author_sort Wang, Sophie
collection PubMed
description Introduction Innovations in cancer treatment coupled with an increasing number of cancer patients have led to the growth of brachytherapy devices. The objective of this study is to characterize the development and safety of brachytherapy devices marketed in the United States (US) over the last 15 years. Methods We reviewed records from a public US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) database detailing premarket approval of brachytherapy devices. All 510(k) submissions approved between January 1, 2000 and October 31, 2018 were examined. To assess the safety of these devices, we searched the manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database for related adverse events. Results Twenty-two brachytherapy devices received 510(k) premarket approval, with the first device approved in 2005. Of the 22 devices, 20 (91%) were marketed with specific indications. The most common indications include treatment of skin cancers and keloids (n=7), breast cancer (n=4), and gynecologic/rectal cancers (n=2). A review of the MAUDE database revealed 64 reports of adverse events associated with brachytherapy devices. Common adverse effects include poor device design, use error, and device malfunction that led to the delivery of an inaccurate dose of radiation. Discussion Although there are some single-center, short-term studies demonstrating adequate local control and satisfactory cosmesis with brachytherapy, data on long-term outcomes are lacking. Further research is warranted to define appropriate practice guidelines for brachytherapy devices in the treatment of various malignancies. 
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6510570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65105702019-05-23 United States Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) Pathway: Drawing Implications from the Approvals of Brachytherapy Devices Wang, Sophie Manudhane, Albert Ezaldein, Harib H Scott, Jeffrey F Cureus Dermatology Introduction Innovations in cancer treatment coupled with an increasing number of cancer patients have led to the growth of brachytherapy devices. The objective of this study is to characterize the development and safety of brachytherapy devices marketed in the United States (US) over the last 15 years. Methods We reviewed records from a public US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) database detailing premarket approval of brachytherapy devices. All 510(k) submissions approved between January 1, 2000 and October 31, 2018 were examined. To assess the safety of these devices, we searched the manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database for related adverse events. Results Twenty-two brachytherapy devices received 510(k) premarket approval, with the first device approved in 2005. Of the 22 devices, 20 (91%) were marketed with specific indications. The most common indications include treatment of skin cancers and keloids (n=7), breast cancer (n=4), and gynecologic/rectal cancers (n=2). A review of the MAUDE database revealed 64 reports of adverse events associated with brachytherapy devices. Common adverse effects include poor device design, use error, and device malfunction that led to the delivery of an inaccurate dose of radiation. Discussion Although there are some single-center, short-term studies demonstrating adequate local control and satisfactory cosmesis with brachytherapy, data on long-term outcomes are lacking. Further research is warranted to define appropriate practice guidelines for brachytherapy devices in the treatment of various malignancies.  Cureus 2019-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6510570/ /pubmed/31123652 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4230 Text en Copyright © 2019, Wang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Dermatology
Wang, Sophie
Manudhane, Albert
Ezaldein, Harib H
Scott, Jeffrey F
United States Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) Pathway: Drawing Implications from the Approvals of Brachytherapy Devices
title United States Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) Pathway: Drawing Implications from the Approvals of Brachytherapy Devices
title_full United States Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) Pathway: Drawing Implications from the Approvals of Brachytherapy Devices
title_fullStr United States Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) Pathway: Drawing Implications from the Approvals of Brachytherapy Devices
title_full_unstemmed United States Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) Pathway: Drawing Implications from the Approvals of Brachytherapy Devices
title_short United States Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) Pathway: Drawing Implications from the Approvals of Brachytherapy Devices
title_sort united states food and drug administration’s 510(k) pathway: drawing implications from the approvals of brachytherapy devices
topic Dermatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31123652
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4230
work_keys_str_mv AT wangsophie unitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrations510kpathwaydrawingimplicationsfromtheapprovalsofbrachytherapydevices
AT manudhanealbert unitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrations510kpathwaydrawingimplicationsfromtheapprovalsofbrachytherapydevices
AT ezaldeinharibh unitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrations510kpathwaydrawingimplicationsfromtheapprovalsofbrachytherapydevices
AT scottjeffreyf unitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrations510kpathwaydrawingimplicationsfromtheapprovalsofbrachytherapydevices