Cargando…
United States Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) Pathway: Drawing Implications from the Approvals of Brachytherapy Devices
Introduction Innovations in cancer treatment coupled with an increasing number of cancer patients have led to the growth of brachytherapy devices. The objective of this study is to characterize the development and safety of brachytherapy devices marketed in the United States (US) over the last 15 ye...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31123652 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4230 |
_version_ | 1783417441224753152 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Sophie Manudhane, Albert Ezaldein, Harib H Scott, Jeffrey F |
author_facet | Wang, Sophie Manudhane, Albert Ezaldein, Harib H Scott, Jeffrey F |
author_sort | Wang, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Innovations in cancer treatment coupled with an increasing number of cancer patients have led to the growth of brachytherapy devices. The objective of this study is to characterize the development and safety of brachytherapy devices marketed in the United States (US) over the last 15 years. Methods We reviewed records from a public US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) database detailing premarket approval of brachytherapy devices. All 510(k) submissions approved between January 1, 2000 and October 31, 2018 were examined. To assess the safety of these devices, we searched the manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database for related adverse events. Results Twenty-two brachytherapy devices received 510(k) premarket approval, with the first device approved in 2005. Of the 22 devices, 20 (91%) were marketed with specific indications. The most common indications include treatment of skin cancers and keloids (n=7), breast cancer (n=4), and gynecologic/rectal cancers (n=2). A review of the MAUDE database revealed 64 reports of adverse events associated with brachytherapy devices. Common adverse effects include poor device design, use error, and device malfunction that led to the delivery of an inaccurate dose of radiation. Discussion Although there are some single-center, short-term studies demonstrating adequate local control and satisfactory cosmesis with brachytherapy, data on long-term outcomes are lacking. Further research is warranted to define appropriate practice guidelines for brachytherapy devices in the treatment of various malignancies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6510570 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65105702019-05-23 United States Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) Pathway: Drawing Implications from the Approvals of Brachytherapy Devices Wang, Sophie Manudhane, Albert Ezaldein, Harib H Scott, Jeffrey F Cureus Dermatology Introduction Innovations in cancer treatment coupled with an increasing number of cancer patients have led to the growth of brachytherapy devices. The objective of this study is to characterize the development and safety of brachytherapy devices marketed in the United States (US) over the last 15 years. Methods We reviewed records from a public US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) database detailing premarket approval of brachytherapy devices. All 510(k) submissions approved between January 1, 2000 and October 31, 2018 were examined. To assess the safety of these devices, we searched the manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database for related adverse events. Results Twenty-two brachytherapy devices received 510(k) premarket approval, with the first device approved in 2005. Of the 22 devices, 20 (91%) were marketed with specific indications. The most common indications include treatment of skin cancers and keloids (n=7), breast cancer (n=4), and gynecologic/rectal cancers (n=2). A review of the MAUDE database revealed 64 reports of adverse events associated with brachytherapy devices. Common adverse effects include poor device design, use error, and device malfunction that led to the delivery of an inaccurate dose of radiation. Discussion Although there are some single-center, short-term studies demonstrating adequate local control and satisfactory cosmesis with brachytherapy, data on long-term outcomes are lacking. Further research is warranted to define appropriate practice guidelines for brachytherapy devices in the treatment of various malignancies. Cureus 2019-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6510570/ /pubmed/31123652 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4230 Text en Copyright © 2019, Wang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Dermatology Wang, Sophie Manudhane, Albert Ezaldein, Harib H Scott, Jeffrey F United States Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) Pathway: Drawing Implications from the Approvals of Brachytherapy Devices |
title | United States Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) Pathway: Drawing Implications from the Approvals of Brachytherapy Devices |
title_full | United States Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) Pathway: Drawing Implications from the Approvals of Brachytherapy Devices |
title_fullStr | United States Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) Pathway: Drawing Implications from the Approvals of Brachytherapy Devices |
title_full_unstemmed | United States Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) Pathway: Drawing Implications from the Approvals of Brachytherapy Devices |
title_short | United States Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) Pathway: Drawing Implications from the Approvals of Brachytherapy Devices |
title_sort | united states food and drug administration’s 510(k) pathway: drawing implications from the approvals of brachytherapy devices |
topic | Dermatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31123652 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4230 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangsophie unitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrations510kpathwaydrawingimplicationsfromtheapprovalsofbrachytherapydevices AT manudhanealbert unitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrations510kpathwaydrawingimplicationsfromtheapprovalsofbrachytherapydevices AT ezaldeinharibh unitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrations510kpathwaydrawingimplicationsfromtheapprovalsofbrachytherapydevices AT scottjeffreyf unitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrations510kpathwaydrawingimplicationsfromtheapprovalsofbrachytherapydevices |