Cargando…

Rupture of a caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: A case report

BACKGROUND: Caesarean scar pregnancy is an uncommon form of ectopic pregnancy characterized by implantation into the site of a caesarean scar. Common clinical features include vaginal bleeding and abdominal pain; however, a significant proportion of cases are asymptomatic. The primary diagnostic mod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Odgers, Harrison L., Taylor, Rebecca A.M., Balendran, Jananie, Benness, Christopher, Ludlow, Joanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31193006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crwh.2019.e00120
_version_ 1783417447742701568
author Odgers, Harrison L.
Taylor, Rebecca A.M.
Balendran, Jananie
Benness, Christopher
Ludlow, Joanne
author_facet Odgers, Harrison L.
Taylor, Rebecca A.M.
Balendran, Jananie
Benness, Christopher
Ludlow, Joanne
author_sort Odgers, Harrison L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Caesarean scar pregnancy is an uncommon form of ectopic pregnancy characterized by implantation into the site of a caesarean scar. Common clinical features include vaginal bleeding and abdominal pain; however, a significant proportion of cases are asymptomatic. The primary diagnostic modality is transvaginal ultrasound. There is no current consensus on best-practice management. CASE PRESENTATION: A 36-year-old woman, G7P2, presented to an early-pregnancy service with vaginal spotting and an ultrasound scan demonstrating a live caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy at 8 + 5 weeks' gestation. On examination she was hemodynamically stable with a soft abdomen. She was advised to have dilation and curettage (D&C) under ultrasound guidance; however, she was concerned that she might require more extensive surgery, such as a hysterectomy and so requested non-surgical management. On day 1 she underwent ultrasound-guided embryocide with lignocaine followed by inpatient multi-dose systemic methotrexate. Her beta-human gonadotrophic hormone level decreased. Repeat ultrasound on day 18 demonstrated a persistent caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy with increased vascularity, and so uterine artery embolization (UAE) was performed with a view to D&C the following day. This plan was altered to expectant management with ongoing follow-up by a different clinician who had had previous success with UAE alone. On day 35 the patient presented with life-threatening vaginal bleeding that required an emergency total abdominal hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Caesarean scar pregnancies are uncommon. Multiple treatment strategies have been employed, with variable degrees of success. Further research into risk stratification and management are needed to guide clinician and patient decision making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6510699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65106992019-05-28 Rupture of a caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: A case report Odgers, Harrison L. Taylor, Rebecca A.M. Balendran, Jananie Benness, Christopher Ludlow, Joanne Case Rep Womens Health Article BACKGROUND: Caesarean scar pregnancy is an uncommon form of ectopic pregnancy characterized by implantation into the site of a caesarean scar. Common clinical features include vaginal bleeding and abdominal pain; however, a significant proportion of cases are asymptomatic. The primary diagnostic modality is transvaginal ultrasound. There is no current consensus on best-practice management. CASE PRESENTATION: A 36-year-old woman, G7P2, presented to an early-pregnancy service with vaginal spotting and an ultrasound scan demonstrating a live caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy at 8 + 5 weeks' gestation. On examination she was hemodynamically stable with a soft abdomen. She was advised to have dilation and curettage (D&C) under ultrasound guidance; however, she was concerned that she might require more extensive surgery, such as a hysterectomy and so requested non-surgical management. On day 1 she underwent ultrasound-guided embryocide with lignocaine followed by inpatient multi-dose systemic methotrexate. Her beta-human gonadotrophic hormone level decreased. Repeat ultrasound on day 18 demonstrated a persistent caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy with increased vascularity, and so uterine artery embolization (UAE) was performed with a view to D&C the following day. This plan was altered to expectant management with ongoing follow-up by a different clinician who had had previous success with UAE alone. On day 35 the patient presented with life-threatening vaginal bleeding that required an emergency total abdominal hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Caesarean scar pregnancies are uncommon. Multiple treatment strategies have been employed, with variable degrees of success. Further research into risk stratification and management are needed to guide clinician and patient decision making. Elsevier 2019-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6510699/ /pubmed/31193006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crwh.2019.e00120 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Odgers, Harrison L.
Taylor, Rebecca A.M.
Balendran, Jananie
Benness, Christopher
Ludlow, Joanne
Rupture of a caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: A case report
title Rupture of a caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: A case report
title_full Rupture of a caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: A case report
title_fullStr Rupture of a caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: A case report
title_full_unstemmed Rupture of a caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: A case report
title_short Rupture of a caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: A case report
title_sort rupture of a caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a case report
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31193006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crwh.2019.e00120
work_keys_str_mv AT odgersharrisonl ruptureofacaesareanscarectopicpregnancyacasereport
AT taylorrebeccaam ruptureofacaesareanscarectopicpregnancyacasereport
AT balendranjananie ruptureofacaesareanscarectopicpregnancyacasereport
AT bennesschristopher ruptureofacaesareanscarectopicpregnancyacasereport
AT ludlowjoanne ruptureofacaesareanscarectopicpregnancyacasereport