Cargando…
Functional Capacity Evaluation in Different Societal Contexts: Results of a Multicountry Study
Purpose To examine factors associated with Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) results in patients with painful musculoskeletal conditions, with focus on social factors across multiple countries. Methods International cross-sectional study was performed within care as usual. Simple and multiple mul...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29802582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9782-x |
_version_ | 1783417483848318976 |
---|---|
author | Ansuategui Echeita, Jone Bethge, Matthias van Holland, Berry J. Gross, Douglas P. Kool, Jan Oesch, Peter Trippolini, Maurizio A. Chapman, Elizabeth Cheng, Andy S. K. Sellars, Robert Spavins, Megan Streibelt, Marco van der Wurff, Peter Reneman, Michiel F. |
author_facet | Ansuategui Echeita, Jone Bethge, Matthias van Holland, Berry J. Gross, Douglas P. Kool, Jan Oesch, Peter Trippolini, Maurizio A. Chapman, Elizabeth Cheng, Andy S. K. Sellars, Robert Spavins, Megan Streibelt, Marco van der Wurff, Peter Reneman, Michiel F. |
author_sort | Ansuategui Echeita, Jone |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose To examine factors associated with Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) results in patients with painful musculoskeletal conditions, with focus on social factors across multiple countries. Methods International cross-sectional study was performed within care as usual. Simple and multiple multilevel linear regression analyses which considered measurement’s dependency within clinicians and country were conducted: FCE characteristics and biopsychosocial variables from patients and clinicians as independent variables; and FCE results (floor-to-waist lift, six-minute walk, and handgrip strength) as dependent variables. Results Data were collected for 372 patients, 54 clinicians, 18 facilities and 8 countries. Patients’ height and reported pain intensity were consistently associated with every FCE result. Patients’ sex, height, reported pain intensity, effort during FCE, social isolation, and disability, clinician’s observed physical effort, and whether FCE test was prematurely ended were associated with lift. Patient’s height, Body Mass Index, post-test heart-rate, reported pain intensity and effort during FCE, days off work, and whether FCE test was prematurely ended were associated with walk. Patient’s age, sex, height, affected body area, reported pain intensity and catastrophizing, and physical work demands were associated with handgrip. Final regression models explained 38‒65% of total variance. Clinician and country random effects composed 1–39% of total residual variance in these models. Conclusion Biopsychosocial factors were associated with every FCE result across multiple countries; specifically, patients’ height, reported pain intensity, clinician, and measurement country. Social factors, which had been under-researched, were consistently associated with FCE performances. Patients’ FCE results should be considered from a biopsychosocial perspective, including different social contexts. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10926-018-9782-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6510856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65108562019-05-28 Functional Capacity Evaluation in Different Societal Contexts: Results of a Multicountry Study Ansuategui Echeita, Jone Bethge, Matthias van Holland, Berry J. Gross, Douglas P. Kool, Jan Oesch, Peter Trippolini, Maurizio A. Chapman, Elizabeth Cheng, Andy S. K. Sellars, Robert Spavins, Megan Streibelt, Marco van der Wurff, Peter Reneman, Michiel F. J Occup Rehabil Article Purpose To examine factors associated with Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) results in patients with painful musculoskeletal conditions, with focus on social factors across multiple countries. Methods International cross-sectional study was performed within care as usual. Simple and multiple multilevel linear regression analyses which considered measurement’s dependency within clinicians and country were conducted: FCE characteristics and biopsychosocial variables from patients and clinicians as independent variables; and FCE results (floor-to-waist lift, six-minute walk, and handgrip strength) as dependent variables. Results Data were collected for 372 patients, 54 clinicians, 18 facilities and 8 countries. Patients’ height and reported pain intensity were consistently associated with every FCE result. Patients’ sex, height, reported pain intensity, effort during FCE, social isolation, and disability, clinician’s observed physical effort, and whether FCE test was prematurely ended were associated with lift. Patient’s height, Body Mass Index, post-test heart-rate, reported pain intensity and effort during FCE, days off work, and whether FCE test was prematurely ended were associated with walk. Patient’s age, sex, height, affected body area, reported pain intensity and catastrophizing, and physical work demands were associated with handgrip. Final regression models explained 38‒65% of total variance. Clinician and country random effects composed 1–39% of total residual variance in these models. Conclusion Biopsychosocial factors were associated with every FCE result across multiple countries; specifically, patients’ height, reported pain intensity, clinician, and measurement country. Social factors, which had been under-researched, were consistently associated with FCE performances. Patients’ FCE results should be considered from a biopsychosocial perspective, including different social contexts. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10926-018-9782-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-05-25 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6510856/ /pubmed/29802582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9782-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018, Corrected publication June/2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Ansuategui Echeita, Jone Bethge, Matthias van Holland, Berry J. Gross, Douglas P. Kool, Jan Oesch, Peter Trippolini, Maurizio A. Chapman, Elizabeth Cheng, Andy S. K. Sellars, Robert Spavins, Megan Streibelt, Marco van der Wurff, Peter Reneman, Michiel F. Functional Capacity Evaluation in Different Societal Contexts: Results of a Multicountry Study |
title | Functional Capacity Evaluation in Different Societal Contexts: Results of a Multicountry Study |
title_full | Functional Capacity Evaluation in Different Societal Contexts: Results of a Multicountry Study |
title_fullStr | Functional Capacity Evaluation in Different Societal Contexts: Results of a Multicountry Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Functional Capacity Evaluation in Different Societal Contexts: Results of a Multicountry Study |
title_short | Functional Capacity Evaluation in Different Societal Contexts: Results of a Multicountry Study |
title_sort | functional capacity evaluation in different societal contexts: results of a multicountry study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6510856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29802582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9782-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ansuateguiecheitajone functionalcapacityevaluationindifferentsocietalcontextsresultsofamulticountrystudy AT bethgematthias functionalcapacityevaluationindifferentsocietalcontextsresultsofamulticountrystudy AT vanhollandberryj functionalcapacityevaluationindifferentsocietalcontextsresultsofamulticountrystudy AT grossdouglasp functionalcapacityevaluationindifferentsocietalcontextsresultsofamulticountrystudy AT kooljan functionalcapacityevaluationindifferentsocietalcontextsresultsofamulticountrystudy AT oeschpeter functionalcapacityevaluationindifferentsocietalcontextsresultsofamulticountrystudy AT trippolinimaurizioa functionalcapacityevaluationindifferentsocietalcontextsresultsofamulticountrystudy AT chapmanelizabeth functionalcapacityevaluationindifferentsocietalcontextsresultsofamulticountrystudy AT chengandysk functionalcapacityevaluationindifferentsocietalcontextsresultsofamulticountrystudy AT sellarsrobert functionalcapacityevaluationindifferentsocietalcontextsresultsofamulticountrystudy AT spavinsmegan functionalcapacityevaluationindifferentsocietalcontextsresultsofamulticountrystudy AT streibeltmarco functionalcapacityevaluationindifferentsocietalcontextsresultsofamulticountrystudy AT vanderwurffpeter functionalcapacityevaluationindifferentsocietalcontextsresultsofamulticountrystudy AT renemanmichielf functionalcapacityevaluationindifferentsocietalcontextsresultsofamulticountrystudy |