Cargando…

Circular statistics meets practical limitations: a simulation-based Rao’s spacing test for non-continuous data

BACKGROUND: For data collected on a circular rather than linear scale, a very common procedure is to test whether the underlying distribution appears to deviate from circular uniformity. Rao’s spacing test is often used to evaluate the support the data offers for the null hypothesis of uniformity. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Landler, Lukas, Ruxton, Graeme D., Malkemper, E. Pascal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6511169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31110771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-019-0160-x
_version_ 1783417533098885120
author Landler, Lukas
Ruxton, Graeme D.
Malkemper, E. Pascal
author_facet Landler, Lukas
Ruxton, Graeme D.
Malkemper, E. Pascal
author_sort Landler, Lukas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For data collected on a circular rather than linear scale, a very common procedure is to test whether the underlying distribution appears to deviate from circular uniformity. Rao’s spacing test is often used to evaluate the support the data offers for the null hypothesis of uniformity. Here we demonstrate that the traditional version of this test fails to adequately control type I error rate when the data is non-continuous (i.e. is rounded/grouped to a finite number of discrete values, e.g. to the nearest degree, a common situation). To overcome this issue, we provide a numerically-intensive simulation version of the test. METHODS: We use a simulation study to explore the performance of the traditional and our novel variant on Rao’s spacing test, both in terms of control of type I error rate and statistical power. RESULTS: When data is measured on a continuous circular scale then both methods offer good control of type I error and similar statistical power. If the data is rounded (even to a relatively fine scale such as to the nearest degree – giving 360 possible values), however, the traditional method produces highly inflated type I error rates, particularly with high sample sizes, that make it inappropriate for application to such data. In contrast, our simulation method retains good control of type I error while offering levels of statistical power similar to the traditional Rao test. CONCLUSIONS: The traditional method of applying Rao’s spacing test should be replaced by the simulation-based variant introduced here. The two methods offer similar performance but only the simulation method retains good control of the type I error rate when circular data is rounded to a finite set of values (likely due to limited precision of measuring equipment). Adoption of the simulation variant will substantially improve the reliability of this regularly-used test in the commonplace situation where data values are rounded. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40462-019-0160-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6511169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65111692019-05-20 Circular statistics meets practical limitations: a simulation-based Rao’s spacing test for non-continuous data Landler, Lukas Ruxton, Graeme D. Malkemper, E. Pascal Mov Ecol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: For data collected on a circular rather than linear scale, a very common procedure is to test whether the underlying distribution appears to deviate from circular uniformity. Rao’s spacing test is often used to evaluate the support the data offers for the null hypothesis of uniformity. Here we demonstrate that the traditional version of this test fails to adequately control type I error rate when the data is non-continuous (i.e. is rounded/grouped to a finite number of discrete values, e.g. to the nearest degree, a common situation). To overcome this issue, we provide a numerically-intensive simulation version of the test. METHODS: We use a simulation study to explore the performance of the traditional and our novel variant on Rao’s spacing test, both in terms of control of type I error rate and statistical power. RESULTS: When data is measured on a continuous circular scale then both methods offer good control of type I error and similar statistical power. If the data is rounded (even to a relatively fine scale such as to the nearest degree – giving 360 possible values), however, the traditional method produces highly inflated type I error rates, particularly with high sample sizes, that make it inappropriate for application to such data. In contrast, our simulation method retains good control of type I error while offering levels of statistical power similar to the traditional Rao test. CONCLUSIONS: The traditional method of applying Rao’s spacing test should be replaced by the simulation-based variant introduced here. The two methods offer similar performance but only the simulation method retains good control of the type I error rate when circular data is rounded to a finite set of values (likely due to limited precision of measuring equipment). Adoption of the simulation variant will substantially improve the reliability of this regularly-used test in the commonplace situation where data values are rounded. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40462-019-0160-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6511169/ /pubmed/31110771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-019-0160-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Landler, Lukas
Ruxton, Graeme D.
Malkemper, E. Pascal
Circular statistics meets practical limitations: a simulation-based Rao’s spacing test for non-continuous data
title Circular statistics meets practical limitations: a simulation-based Rao’s spacing test for non-continuous data
title_full Circular statistics meets practical limitations: a simulation-based Rao’s spacing test for non-continuous data
title_fullStr Circular statistics meets practical limitations: a simulation-based Rao’s spacing test for non-continuous data
title_full_unstemmed Circular statistics meets practical limitations: a simulation-based Rao’s spacing test for non-continuous data
title_short Circular statistics meets practical limitations: a simulation-based Rao’s spacing test for non-continuous data
title_sort circular statistics meets practical limitations: a simulation-based rao’s spacing test for non-continuous data
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6511169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31110771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-019-0160-x
work_keys_str_mv AT landlerlukas circularstatisticsmeetspracticallimitationsasimulationbasedraosspacingtestfornoncontinuousdata
AT ruxtongraemed circularstatisticsmeetspracticallimitationsasimulationbasedraosspacingtestfornoncontinuousdata
AT malkemperepascal circularstatisticsmeetspracticallimitationsasimulationbasedraosspacingtestfornoncontinuousdata