Cargando…
Olfactory function is associated with cognitive performance: results from the population-based LIFE-Adult-Study
BACKGROUND: Studies in older adults or those with cognitive impairment have shown associations between cognitive and olfactory performance, but there are few population-based studies especially in younger adults. We therefore cross-sectionally analyzed this association using data from the population...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6511191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31077241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-019-0494-z |
_version_ | 1783417538254733312 |
---|---|
author | Yahiaoui-Doktor, Maryam Luck, Tobias Riedel-Heller, Steffi G. Loeffler, Markus Wirkner, Kerstin Engel, Christoph |
author_facet | Yahiaoui-Doktor, Maryam Luck, Tobias Riedel-Heller, Steffi G. Loeffler, Markus Wirkner, Kerstin Engel, Christoph |
author_sort | Yahiaoui-Doktor, Maryam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Studies in older adults or those with cognitive impairment have shown associations between cognitive and olfactory performance, but there are few population-based studies especially in younger adults. We therefore cross-sectionally analyzed this association using data from the population-based LIFE-Adult-Study. METHODS: Cognitive assessments comprised tests from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD): verbal fluency (VF), word list learning and recall (WLL, WLR), and the Trail Making Tests (TMT) A and B. The “Sniffin’ Sticks Screening 12” test was used to measure olfactory performance. Linear regression analyses were performed to determine associations between the number of correctly identified odors (0 to 12) and the five cognitive test scores, adjusted for sex, age, education, and the presence of depressive symptoms. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was carried out to determine the discriminative performance of the number of correctly identified odors regarding identification of cognition impairment. RESULTS: A total of 6783 participants (51.3% female) completed the olfaction test and the VF test and TMT. A subgroup of 2227 participants (46.9% female) also completed the WLL and WLR tests. Based on age-, sex-, and education-specific norms from CERAD, the following numbers of participants were considered cognitively impaired: VF 759 (11.2%), WLL 242 (10.9%), WLR: 132 (5.9%), TMT-A 415 (6.1%), and TMT-B/A ratio 677 (10.0%). On average, score values for VF were higher by 0.42 points (p < 0.001), for WLL higher by 0.32 points (p = 0.001), for WLR higher by 0.31 points (p = 0.002), for TMT-A lower by 0.25 points (p < 0.001), and for TMT-B/A ratio lower by 0.01 points (p < 0.001) per number of correctly identified odors. ROC analysis revealed area under the curve values from 0.55 to 0.62 for the five cognitive tests. CONCLUSIONS: Better olfactory performance was associated with better cognitive performance in all five tests in adults — adjusted for age, sex, education, and the presence of depressive symptoms. However, the ability of the smell test to discriminate between individuals with and without cognitive impairment was limited. The value of olfactory testing in early screening for cognitive impairment should be investigated in longitudinal studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6511191 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65111912019-05-20 Olfactory function is associated with cognitive performance: results from the population-based LIFE-Adult-Study Yahiaoui-Doktor, Maryam Luck, Tobias Riedel-Heller, Steffi G. Loeffler, Markus Wirkner, Kerstin Engel, Christoph Alzheimers Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: Studies in older adults or those with cognitive impairment have shown associations between cognitive and olfactory performance, but there are few population-based studies especially in younger adults. We therefore cross-sectionally analyzed this association using data from the population-based LIFE-Adult-Study. METHODS: Cognitive assessments comprised tests from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD): verbal fluency (VF), word list learning and recall (WLL, WLR), and the Trail Making Tests (TMT) A and B. The “Sniffin’ Sticks Screening 12” test was used to measure olfactory performance. Linear regression analyses were performed to determine associations between the number of correctly identified odors (0 to 12) and the five cognitive test scores, adjusted for sex, age, education, and the presence of depressive symptoms. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was carried out to determine the discriminative performance of the number of correctly identified odors regarding identification of cognition impairment. RESULTS: A total of 6783 participants (51.3% female) completed the olfaction test and the VF test and TMT. A subgroup of 2227 participants (46.9% female) also completed the WLL and WLR tests. Based on age-, sex-, and education-specific norms from CERAD, the following numbers of participants were considered cognitively impaired: VF 759 (11.2%), WLL 242 (10.9%), WLR: 132 (5.9%), TMT-A 415 (6.1%), and TMT-B/A ratio 677 (10.0%). On average, score values for VF were higher by 0.42 points (p < 0.001), for WLL higher by 0.32 points (p = 0.001), for WLR higher by 0.31 points (p = 0.002), for TMT-A lower by 0.25 points (p < 0.001), and for TMT-B/A ratio lower by 0.01 points (p < 0.001) per number of correctly identified odors. ROC analysis revealed area under the curve values from 0.55 to 0.62 for the five cognitive tests. CONCLUSIONS: Better olfactory performance was associated with better cognitive performance in all five tests in adults — adjusted for age, sex, education, and the presence of depressive symptoms. However, the ability of the smell test to discriminate between individuals with and without cognitive impairment was limited. The value of olfactory testing in early screening for cognitive impairment should be investigated in longitudinal studies. BioMed Central 2019-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6511191/ /pubmed/31077241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-019-0494-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Yahiaoui-Doktor, Maryam Luck, Tobias Riedel-Heller, Steffi G. Loeffler, Markus Wirkner, Kerstin Engel, Christoph Olfactory function is associated with cognitive performance: results from the population-based LIFE-Adult-Study |
title | Olfactory function is associated with cognitive performance: results from the population-based LIFE-Adult-Study |
title_full | Olfactory function is associated with cognitive performance: results from the population-based LIFE-Adult-Study |
title_fullStr | Olfactory function is associated with cognitive performance: results from the population-based LIFE-Adult-Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Olfactory function is associated with cognitive performance: results from the population-based LIFE-Adult-Study |
title_short | Olfactory function is associated with cognitive performance: results from the population-based LIFE-Adult-Study |
title_sort | olfactory function is associated with cognitive performance: results from the population-based life-adult-study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6511191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31077241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-019-0494-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yahiaouidoktormaryam olfactoryfunctionisassociatedwithcognitiveperformanceresultsfromthepopulationbasedlifeadultstudy AT lucktobias olfactoryfunctionisassociatedwithcognitiveperformanceresultsfromthepopulationbasedlifeadultstudy AT riedelhellersteffig olfactoryfunctionisassociatedwithcognitiveperformanceresultsfromthepopulationbasedlifeadultstudy AT loefflermarkus olfactoryfunctionisassociatedwithcognitiveperformanceresultsfromthepopulationbasedlifeadultstudy AT wirknerkerstin olfactoryfunctionisassociatedwithcognitiveperformanceresultsfromthepopulationbasedlifeadultstudy AT engelchristoph olfactoryfunctionisassociatedwithcognitiveperformanceresultsfromthepopulationbasedlifeadultstudy |