Cargando…

Anovaginal distance and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: No measurements are available for diagnosing the extent of obstetric lacerations. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between the anovaginal distance (AVD) measured with transperineal ultrasound immediately after delivery and external anal sphincte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pihl, Sofia, Uustal, Eva, Blomberg, Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6511353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30535980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3838-5
_version_ 1783417560825331712
author Pihl, Sofia
Uustal, Eva
Blomberg, Marie
author_facet Pihl, Sofia
Uustal, Eva
Blomberg, Marie
author_sort Pihl, Sofia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: No measurements are available for diagnosing the extent of obstetric lacerations. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between the anovaginal distance (AVD) measured with transperineal ultrasound immediately after delivery and external anal sphincter injury. A secondary aim was to assess whether the palpated perineal thickness was associated with the AVD. METHODS: A prospective observational study of 150 primiparous women at the University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden. After vaginal delivery, initial inspection and palpation of the perineal thickness were performed by the midwife. The women were then divided into subgroups depending on the degree of the suspected perineal laceration. Transperineal ultrasound of the AVD was performed by a physician. Diagnostics of the perineal laceration were done according to standard care. RESULTS: Women with an external sphincter injury had a shorter AVD and shorter palpatory perineal thickness compared with women without anal sphincter injury. No external sphincter injuries were diagnosed when the AVD and/or palpation height was > 20 mm. The mean AVD in the group with probable second-degree laceration (n = 85) was 18.8 mm (95% CI 17.8–19.8), in suspected third-degree laceration (n = 33) 15.7 mm (95% CI 13.7–17.7) and in probable third-degree laceration (n = 32) 11.8 mm (95% CI 9.7–13.9) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A short AVD could be a warning sign postpartum and should increase the awareness of possible external sphincter injury before suturing. An AVD of 20 mm seems to indicate a cutoff level of the occurrence of external sphincter injury, but this needs further evaluation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-018-3838-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6511353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65113532019-05-28 Anovaginal distance and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective observational study Pihl, Sofia Uustal, Eva Blomberg, Marie Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: No measurements are available for diagnosing the extent of obstetric lacerations. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between the anovaginal distance (AVD) measured with transperineal ultrasound immediately after delivery and external anal sphincter injury. A secondary aim was to assess whether the palpated perineal thickness was associated with the AVD. METHODS: A prospective observational study of 150 primiparous women at the University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden. After vaginal delivery, initial inspection and palpation of the perineal thickness were performed by the midwife. The women were then divided into subgroups depending on the degree of the suspected perineal laceration. Transperineal ultrasound of the AVD was performed by a physician. Diagnostics of the perineal laceration were done according to standard care. RESULTS: Women with an external sphincter injury had a shorter AVD and shorter palpatory perineal thickness compared with women without anal sphincter injury. No external sphincter injuries were diagnosed when the AVD and/or palpation height was > 20 mm. The mean AVD in the group with probable second-degree laceration (n = 85) was 18.8 mm (95% CI 17.8–19.8), in suspected third-degree laceration (n = 33) 15.7 mm (95% CI 13.7–17.7) and in probable third-degree laceration (n = 32) 11.8 mm (95% CI 9.7–13.9) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A short AVD could be a warning sign postpartum and should increase the awareness of possible external sphincter injury before suturing. An AVD of 20 mm seems to indicate a cutoff level of the occurrence of external sphincter injury, but this needs further evaluation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-018-3838-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-12-10 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6511353/ /pubmed/30535980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3838-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pihl, Sofia
Uustal, Eva
Blomberg, Marie
Anovaginal distance and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective observational study
title Anovaginal distance and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective observational study
title_full Anovaginal distance and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective observational study
title_fullStr Anovaginal distance and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Anovaginal distance and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective observational study
title_short Anovaginal distance and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective observational study
title_sort anovaginal distance and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective observational study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6511353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30535980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3838-5
work_keys_str_mv AT pihlsofia anovaginaldistanceandobstetricanalsphincterinjuryaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT uustaleva anovaginaldistanceandobstetricanalsphincterinjuryaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT blombergmarie anovaginaldistanceandobstetricanalsphincterinjuryaprospectiveobservationalstudy