Cargando…

Usefulness of bounce-back admission in monitoring the quality of practice in the emergency department

Background: Recently, unscheduled readmissions after discharge from the emergency department (ED) (bounce-back admissions, BBAs) have been monitored as a hospital performance measure in countries other than Japan. It has been suggested that BBAs may be caused by errors in diagnoses or treatments. Pu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tarumi, Yoko, Harada, Taku, Saito, Tsukasa, Hiroshige, Juichi, Dohi, Kenji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6511631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31190845
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S193863
_version_ 1783417602122448896
author Tarumi, Yoko
Harada, Taku
Saito, Tsukasa
Hiroshige, Juichi
Dohi, Kenji
author_facet Tarumi, Yoko
Harada, Taku
Saito, Tsukasa
Hiroshige, Juichi
Dohi, Kenji
author_sort Tarumi, Yoko
collection PubMed
description Background: Recently, unscheduled readmissions after discharge from the emergency department (ED) (bounce-back admissions, BBAs) have been monitored as a hospital performance measure in countries other than Japan. It has been suggested that BBAs may be caused by errors in diagnoses or treatments. Purpose: This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate BBAs and improve the quality of medical care in the ED of Showa University Hospital by analyzing the data of adult patients (≥18 years) with index visits to the ED of Showa University Hospital between June 2011 and May 2013 (n=15,069). Patients and methods: Patients were registered and followed up for unscheduled admissions to this hospital within 7 days. In order to understand the reasons for BBAs, individual diagnoses upon BBA were compared to the corresponding diagnoses upon discharge. Results: Among the 11,669 discharged patients, 180 patients were admitted within 3 days after discharge (3-day BBAs), and 257 were admitted within 7 days after discharge (7-day BBAs). The main diagnoses upon admission (BBA) were pneumonia or exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma (n=40, 16%), cholecystitis or cholangitis (n=21, 8.2%), and urinary tract infection (n=16, 6.2%). Among the 7-day BBA cases, 117 patients had similar and 110 patients had different diagnoses upon discharge and admission; in the remaining 30 cases, the results could not be ascertained owing to incomplete diagnostic data. In the cases of pneumonia, exacerbation of COPD or asthma, and colitis or enterocolitis, there was a significantly higher “similar” diagnoses than “different”, while the reverse was true for cases of stroke, ileus or bowel obstruction, and meningitis. These results were shared with the ED staff, and similar surveillances were periodically conducted. The frequency of admission within 7 days after discharge continuously declined from 2013 to 2016. Conclusion: Analyzing the discharge and admission diagnoses may help ED staff to understand the reasons for common errors in order to follow the plan-do-check-act cycle of medical care in the ED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6511631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65116312019-06-12 Usefulness of bounce-back admission in monitoring the quality of practice in the emergency department Tarumi, Yoko Harada, Taku Saito, Tsukasa Hiroshige, Juichi Dohi, Kenji Ther Clin Risk Manag Original Research Background: Recently, unscheduled readmissions after discharge from the emergency department (ED) (bounce-back admissions, BBAs) have been monitored as a hospital performance measure in countries other than Japan. It has been suggested that BBAs may be caused by errors in diagnoses or treatments. Purpose: This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate BBAs and improve the quality of medical care in the ED of Showa University Hospital by analyzing the data of adult patients (≥18 years) with index visits to the ED of Showa University Hospital between June 2011 and May 2013 (n=15,069). Patients and methods: Patients were registered and followed up for unscheduled admissions to this hospital within 7 days. In order to understand the reasons for BBAs, individual diagnoses upon BBA were compared to the corresponding diagnoses upon discharge. Results: Among the 11,669 discharged patients, 180 patients were admitted within 3 days after discharge (3-day BBAs), and 257 were admitted within 7 days after discharge (7-day BBAs). The main diagnoses upon admission (BBA) were pneumonia or exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma (n=40, 16%), cholecystitis or cholangitis (n=21, 8.2%), and urinary tract infection (n=16, 6.2%). Among the 7-day BBA cases, 117 patients had similar and 110 patients had different diagnoses upon discharge and admission; in the remaining 30 cases, the results could not be ascertained owing to incomplete diagnostic data. In the cases of pneumonia, exacerbation of COPD or asthma, and colitis or enterocolitis, there was a significantly higher “similar” diagnoses than “different”, while the reverse was true for cases of stroke, ileus or bowel obstruction, and meningitis. These results were shared with the ED staff, and similar surveillances were periodically conducted. The frequency of admission within 7 days after discharge continuously declined from 2013 to 2016. Conclusion: Analyzing the discharge and admission diagnoses may help ED staff to understand the reasons for common errors in order to follow the plan-do-check-act cycle of medical care in the ED. Dove 2019-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6511631/ /pubmed/31190845 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S193863 Text en © 2019 Tarumi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Tarumi, Yoko
Harada, Taku
Saito, Tsukasa
Hiroshige, Juichi
Dohi, Kenji
Usefulness of bounce-back admission in monitoring the quality of practice in the emergency department
title Usefulness of bounce-back admission in monitoring the quality of practice in the emergency department
title_full Usefulness of bounce-back admission in monitoring the quality of practice in the emergency department
title_fullStr Usefulness of bounce-back admission in monitoring the quality of practice in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of bounce-back admission in monitoring the quality of practice in the emergency department
title_short Usefulness of bounce-back admission in monitoring the quality of practice in the emergency department
title_sort usefulness of bounce-back admission in monitoring the quality of practice in the emergency department
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6511631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31190845
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S193863
work_keys_str_mv AT tarumiyoko usefulnessofbouncebackadmissioninmonitoringthequalityofpracticeintheemergencydepartment
AT haradataku usefulnessofbouncebackadmissioninmonitoringthequalityofpracticeintheemergencydepartment
AT saitotsukasa usefulnessofbouncebackadmissioninmonitoringthequalityofpracticeintheemergencydepartment
AT hiroshigejuichi usefulnessofbouncebackadmissioninmonitoringthequalityofpracticeintheemergencydepartment
AT dohikenji usefulnessofbouncebackadmissioninmonitoringthequalityofpracticeintheemergencydepartment