Cargando…

Silent Brain Infarcts Following Cardiac Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

BACKGROUND: Silent brain infarcts (SBI) are increasingly being recognized as an important complication of cardiac procedures as well as a potential surrogate marker for studies on brain injury. The extent of subclinical brain injury is poorly defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a systematic r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Indja, Ben, Woldendorp, Kei, Vallely, Michael P., Grieve, Stuart M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6512106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31017035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010920
_version_ 1783417654126575616
author Indja, Ben
Woldendorp, Kei
Vallely, Michael P.
Grieve, Stuart M.
author_facet Indja, Ben
Woldendorp, Kei
Vallely, Michael P.
Grieve, Stuart M.
author_sort Indja, Ben
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Silent brain infarcts (SBI) are increasingly being recognized as an important complication of cardiac procedures as well as a potential surrogate marker for studies on brain injury. The extent of subclinical brain injury is poorly defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis utilizing studies of SBIs and focal neurologic deficits following cardiac procedures. Our final analysis included 42 studies with 49 separate intervention groups for a total of 2632 patients. The prevalence of SBIs following transcatheter aortic valve implantation was 0.71 (95% CI 0.64‐0.77); following aortic valve replacement 0.44 (95% CI 0.31‐0.57); in a mixed cardiothoracic surgery group 0.39 (95% CI 0.28‐0.49); coronary artery bypass graft 0.25 (95% CI 0.15‐0.35); percutaneous coronary intervention 0.14 (95% CI 0.10‐0.19); and off‐pump coronary artery bypass 0.14 (0.00‐0.58). The risk ratio of focal neurologic deficits to SBI in aortic valve replacement was 0.22 (95% CI 0.15‐0.32); in off‐pump coronary artery bypass 0.21 (95% CI 0.02‐2.04); with mixed cardiothoracic surgery 0.15 (95% CI 0.07‐0.33); coronary artery bypass graft 0.10 (95% CI 0.05‐0.18); transcatheter aortic valve implantation 0.10 (95% CI 0.07‐0.14); and percutaneous coronary intervention 0.06 (95% CI 0.03‐0.14). The mean number of SBIs per patient was significantly higher in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation group (4.58 ± 2.09) compared with both the aortic valve replacement group (2.16 ± 1.62, P=0.03) and the percutaneous coronary intervention group (1.88 ± 1.02, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: SBIs are a very common complication following cardiac procedures, particularly those involving the aortic valve. The high frequency of SBIs compared with strokes highlights the importance of recording this surrogate measure in cardiac interventional studies. We suggest that further work is required to standardize reporting in order to facilitate the use of SBIs as a routine outcome measure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6512106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65121062019-05-20 Silent Brain Infarcts Following Cardiac Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Indja, Ben Woldendorp, Kei Vallely, Michael P. Grieve, Stuart M. J Am Heart Assoc Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis BACKGROUND: Silent brain infarcts (SBI) are increasingly being recognized as an important complication of cardiac procedures as well as a potential surrogate marker for studies on brain injury. The extent of subclinical brain injury is poorly defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis utilizing studies of SBIs and focal neurologic deficits following cardiac procedures. Our final analysis included 42 studies with 49 separate intervention groups for a total of 2632 patients. The prevalence of SBIs following transcatheter aortic valve implantation was 0.71 (95% CI 0.64‐0.77); following aortic valve replacement 0.44 (95% CI 0.31‐0.57); in a mixed cardiothoracic surgery group 0.39 (95% CI 0.28‐0.49); coronary artery bypass graft 0.25 (95% CI 0.15‐0.35); percutaneous coronary intervention 0.14 (95% CI 0.10‐0.19); and off‐pump coronary artery bypass 0.14 (0.00‐0.58). The risk ratio of focal neurologic deficits to SBI in aortic valve replacement was 0.22 (95% CI 0.15‐0.32); in off‐pump coronary artery bypass 0.21 (95% CI 0.02‐2.04); with mixed cardiothoracic surgery 0.15 (95% CI 0.07‐0.33); coronary artery bypass graft 0.10 (95% CI 0.05‐0.18); transcatheter aortic valve implantation 0.10 (95% CI 0.07‐0.14); and percutaneous coronary intervention 0.06 (95% CI 0.03‐0.14). The mean number of SBIs per patient was significantly higher in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation group (4.58 ± 2.09) compared with both the aortic valve replacement group (2.16 ± 1.62, P=0.03) and the percutaneous coronary intervention group (1.88 ± 1.02, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: SBIs are a very common complication following cardiac procedures, particularly those involving the aortic valve. The high frequency of SBIs compared with strokes highlights the importance of recording this surrogate measure in cardiac interventional studies. We suggest that further work is required to standardize reporting in order to facilitate the use of SBIs as a routine outcome measure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6512106/ /pubmed/31017035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010920 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
Indja, Ben
Woldendorp, Kei
Vallely, Michael P.
Grieve, Stuart M.
Silent Brain Infarcts Following Cardiac Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title Silent Brain Infarcts Following Cardiac Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full Silent Brain Infarcts Following Cardiac Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_fullStr Silent Brain Infarcts Following Cardiac Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Silent Brain Infarcts Following Cardiac Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_short Silent Brain Infarcts Following Cardiac Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_sort silent brain infarcts following cardiac procedures: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6512106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31017035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.010920
work_keys_str_mv AT indjaben silentbraininfarctsfollowingcardiacproceduresasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT woldendorpkei silentbraininfarctsfollowingcardiacproceduresasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vallelymichaelp silentbraininfarctsfollowingcardiacproceduresasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT grievestuartm silentbraininfarctsfollowingcardiacproceduresasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis