Cargando…

Automated summarisation of SDOCT volumes using deep learning: Transfer learning vs de novo trained networks

Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) is a non-invasive imaging modality that generates high-resolution volumetric images. This modality finds widespread usage in ophthalmology for the diagnosis and management of various ocular conditions. The volumes generated can contain 200 or more...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Antony, Bhavna Josephine, Maetschke, Stefan, Garnavi, Rahil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31083678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203726
_version_ 1783417715994656768
author Antony, Bhavna Josephine
Maetschke, Stefan
Garnavi, Rahil
author_facet Antony, Bhavna Josephine
Maetschke, Stefan
Garnavi, Rahil
author_sort Antony, Bhavna Josephine
collection PubMed
description Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) is a non-invasive imaging modality that generates high-resolution volumetric images. This modality finds widespread usage in ophthalmology for the diagnosis and management of various ocular conditions. The volumes generated can contain 200 or more B-scans. Manual inspection of such large quantity of scans is time consuming and error prone in most clinical settings. Here, we present a method for the generation of visual summaries of SDOCT volumes, wherein a small set of B-scans that highlight the most clinically relevant features in a volume are extracted. The method was trained and evaluated on data acquired from age-related macular degeneration patients, and “relevance” was defined as the presence of visibly discernible structural abnormalities. The summarisation system consists of a detection module, where relevant B-scans are extracted from the volume, and a set of rules that determines which B-scans are included in the visual summary. Two deep learning approaches are presented and compared for the classification of B-scans—transfer learning and de novo learning. Both approaches performed comparably with AUCs of 0.97 and 0.96, respectively, obtained on an independent test set. The de novo network, however, was 98% smaller than the transfer learning approach, and had a run-time that was also significantly shorter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6513047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65130472019-05-31 Automated summarisation of SDOCT volumes using deep learning: Transfer learning vs de novo trained networks Antony, Bhavna Josephine Maetschke, Stefan Garnavi, Rahil PLoS One Research Article Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) is a non-invasive imaging modality that generates high-resolution volumetric images. This modality finds widespread usage in ophthalmology for the diagnosis and management of various ocular conditions. The volumes generated can contain 200 or more B-scans. Manual inspection of such large quantity of scans is time consuming and error prone in most clinical settings. Here, we present a method for the generation of visual summaries of SDOCT volumes, wherein a small set of B-scans that highlight the most clinically relevant features in a volume are extracted. The method was trained and evaluated on data acquired from age-related macular degeneration patients, and “relevance” was defined as the presence of visibly discernible structural abnormalities. The summarisation system consists of a detection module, where relevant B-scans are extracted from the volume, and a set of rules that determines which B-scans are included in the visual summary. Two deep learning approaches are presented and compared for the classification of B-scans—transfer learning and de novo learning. Both approaches performed comparably with AUCs of 0.97 and 0.96, respectively, obtained on an independent test set. The de novo network, however, was 98% smaller than the transfer learning approach, and had a run-time that was also significantly shorter. Public Library of Science 2019-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6513047/ /pubmed/31083678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203726 Text en © 2019 Antony et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Antony, Bhavna Josephine
Maetschke, Stefan
Garnavi, Rahil
Automated summarisation of SDOCT volumes using deep learning: Transfer learning vs de novo trained networks
title Automated summarisation of SDOCT volumes using deep learning: Transfer learning vs de novo trained networks
title_full Automated summarisation of SDOCT volumes using deep learning: Transfer learning vs de novo trained networks
title_fullStr Automated summarisation of SDOCT volumes using deep learning: Transfer learning vs de novo trained networks
title_full_unstemmed Automated summarisation of SDOCT volumes using deep learning: Transfer learning vs de novo trained networks
title_short Automated summarisation of SDOCT volumes using deep learning: Transfer learning vs de novo trained networks
title_sort automated summarisation of sdoct volumes using deep learning: transfer learning vs de novo trained networks
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31083678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203726
work_keys_str_mv AT antonybhavnajosephine automatedsummarisationofsdoctvolumesusingdeeplearningtransferlearningvsdenovotrainednetworks
AT maetschkestefan automatedsummarisationofsdoctvolumesusingdeeplearningtransferlearningvsdenovotrainednetworks
AT garnavirahil automatedsummarisationofsdoctvolumesusingdeeplearningtransferlearningvsdenovotrainednetworks