Cargando…
Automated summarisation of SDOCT volumes using deep learning: Transfer learning vs de novo trained networks
Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) is a non-invasive imaging modality that generates high-resolution volumetric images. This modality finds widespread usage in ophthalmology for the diagnosis and management of various ocular conditions. The volumes generated can contain 200 or more...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31083678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203726 |
_version_ | 1783417715994656768 |
---|---|
author | Antony, Bhavna Josephine Maetschke, Stefan Garnavi, Rahil |
author_facet | Antony, Bhavna Josephine Maetschke, Stefan Garnavi, Rahil |
author_sort | Antony, Bhavna Josephine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) is a non-invasive imaging modality that generates high-resolution volumetric images. This modality finds widespread usage in ophthalmology for the diagnosis and management of various ocular conditions. The volumes generated can contain 200 or more B-scans. Manual inspection of such large quantity of scans is time consuming and error prone in most clinical settings. Here, we present a method for the generation of visual summaries of SDOCT volumes, wherein a small set of B-scans that highlight the most clinically relevant features in a volume are extracted. The method was trained and evaluated on data acquired from age-related macular degeneration patients, and “relevance” was defined as the presence of visibly discernible structural abnormalities. The summarisation system consists of a detection module, where relevant B-scans are extracted from the volume, and a set of rules that determines which B-scans are included in the visual summary. Two deep learning approaches are presented and compared for the classification of B-scans—transfer learning and de novo learning. Both approaches performed comparably with AUCs of 0.97 and 0.96, respectively, obtained on an independent test set. The de novo network, however, was 98% smaller than the transfer learning approach, and had a run-time that was also significantly shorter. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6513047 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65130472019-05-31 Automated summarisation of SDOCT volumes using deep learning: Transfer learning vs de novo trained networks Antony, Bhavna Josephine Maetschke, Stefan Garnavi, Rahil PLoS One Research Article Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) is a non-invasive imaging modality that generates high-resolution volumetric images. This modality finds widespread usage in ophthalmology for the diagnosis and management of various ocular conditions. The volumes generated can contain 200 or more B-scans. Manual inspection of such large quantity of scans is time consuming and error prone in most clinical settings. Here, we present a method for the generation of visual summaries of SDOCT volumes, wherein a small set of B-scans that highlight the most clinically relevant features in a volume are extracted. The method was trained and evaluated on data acquired from age-related macular degeneration patients, and “relevance” was defined as the presence of visibly discernible structural abnormalities. The summarisation system consists of a detection module, where relevant B-scans are extracted from the volume, and a set of rules that determines which B-scans are included in the visual summary. Two deep learning approaches are presented and compared for the classification of B-scans—transfer learning and de novo learning. Both approaches performed comparably with AUCs of 0.97 and 0.96, respectively, obtained on an independent test set. The de novo network, however, was 98% smaller than the transfer learning approach, and had a run-time that was also significantly shorter. Public Library of Science 2019-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6513047/ /pubmed/31083678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203726 Text en © 2019 Antony et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Antony, Bhavna Josephine Maetschke, Stefan Garnavi, Rahil Automated summarisation of SDOCT volumes using deep learning: Transfer learning vs de novo trained networks |
title | Automated summarisation of SDOCT volumes using deep learning: Transfer learning vs de novo trained networks |
title_full | Automated summarisation of SDOCT volumes using deep learning: Transfer learning vs de novo trained networks |
title_fullStr | Automated summarisation of SDOCT volumes using deep learning: Transfer learning vs de novo trained networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated summarisation of SDOCT volumes using deep learning: Transfer learning vs de novo trained networks |
title_short | Automated summarisation of SDOCT volumes using deep learning: Transfer learning vs de novo trained networks |
title_sort | automated summarisation of sdoct volumes using deep learning: transfer learning vs de novo trained networks |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31083678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203726 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT antonybhavnajosephine automatedsummarisationofsdoctvolumesusingdeeplearningtransferlearningvsdenovotrainednetworks AT maetschkestefan automatedsummarisationofsdoctvolumesusingdeeplearningtransferlearningvsdenovotrainednetworks AT garnavirahil automatedsummarisationofsdoctvolumesusingdeeplearningtransferlearningvsdenovotrainednetworks |