Cargando…

Developing a Web-Based Cost Assessment Tool for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs

INTRODUCTION: We developed a web-based cost assessment tool (CAT) to collect cost data as an improvement from a desktop instrument to perform economic evaluations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) grantees. We describe the developme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoover, Sonja, Subramanian, Sujha, Tangka, Florence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31050637
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd16.180336
_version_ 1783417744414212096
author Hoover, Sonja
Subramanian, Sujha
Tangka, Florence
author_facet Hoover, Sonja
Subramanian, Sujha
Tangka, Florence
author_sort Hoover, Sonja
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We developed a web-based cost assessment tool (CAT) to collect cost data as an improvement from a desktop instrument to perform economic evaluations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) grantees. We describe the development of the web-based CAT, evaluate the quality of the data obtained, and discuss lessons learned. METHODS: We developed and refined a web-based CAT to collect 5 years (2009–2014) of cost data from 29 CRCCP grantees. We analyzed funding distribution; costs by budget categories; distribution of costs related to screening promotion, screening provision, and overarching activities; and reporting of screenings for grantees that received funding from non-CDC sources compared with those grantees that did not. RESULTS: CDC provided 85.6% of the resources for the CRCCP, with smaller amounts from in-kind contributions (7.8%), and funding from other sources (6.6%) (eg, state funding). Grantees allocated, on average, 95% of their expenditures to specific program activities and 5% to other activities. Some non-CDC funds were used to provide screening tests to additional people, and these additional screens were captured in the CAT. CONCLUSION: A web-based tool can be successfully used to collect cost data on expenditures associated with CRCCP activities. Areas for future refinement include how to collect and allocate dollars from other sources in addition to CDC dollars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6513486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65134862019-05-24 Developing a Web-Based Cost Assessment Tool for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs Hoover, Sonja Subramanian, Sujha Tangka, Florence Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: We developed a web-based cost assessment tool (CAT) to collect cost data as an improvement from a desktop instrument to perform economic evaluations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) grantees. We describe the development of the web-based CAT, evaluate the quality of the data obtained, and discuss lessons learned. METHODS: We developed and refined a web-based CAT to collect 5 years (2009–2014) of cost data from 29 CRCCP grantees. We analyzed funding distribution; costs by budget categories; distribution of costs related to screening promotion, screening provision, and overarching activities; and reporting of screenings for grantees that received funding from non-CDC sources compared with those grantees that did not. RESULTS: CDC provided 85.6% of the resources for the CRCCP, with smaller amounts from in-kind contributions (7.8%), and funding from other sources (6.6%) (eg, state funding). Grantees allocated, on average, 95% of their expenditures to specific program activities and 5% to other activities. Some non-CDC funds were used to provide screening tests to additional people, and these additional screens were captured in the CAT. CONCLUSION: A web-based tool can be successfully used to collect cost data on expenditures associated with CRCCP activities. Areas for future refinement include how to collect and allocate dollars from other sources in addition to CDC dollars. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2019-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6513486/ /pubmed/31050637 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd16.180336 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hoover, Sonja
Subramanian, Sujha
Tangka, Florence
Developing a Web-Based Cost Assessment Tool for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs
title Developing a Web-Based Cost Assessment Tool for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs
title_full Developing a Web-Based Cost Assessment Tool for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs
title_fullStr Developing a Web-Based Cost Assessment Tool for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs
title_full_unstemmed Developing a Web-Based Cost Assessment Tool for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs
title_short Developing a Web-Based Cost Assessment Tool for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs
title_sort developing a web-based cost assessment tool for colorectal cancer screening programs
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31050637
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd16.180336
work_keys_str_mv AT hooversonja developingawebbasedcostassessmenttoolforcolorectalcancerscreeningprograms
AT subramaniansujha developingawebbasedcostassessmenttoolforcolorectalcancerscreeningprograms
AT tangkaflorence developingawebbasedcostassessmenttoolforcolorectalcancerscreeningprograms