Cargando…
Short-Term Safety Evaluation of a Multi-Pressure Dial: A Prospective, Open-label, Non-randomized Study
INTRODUCTION: Prospective, open-label, non-randomized, single site study to assess the safety and tolerability of a multi-pressure dial. METHODS: 30 healthy subjects received application of negative pressure (–15 mmHg) in one eye for 30 minutes and ambient atmospheric pressure in the contralateral e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513913/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30919318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0181-y |
_version_ | 1783417789420142592 |
---|---|
author | Thompson, Vance M. Ferguson, Tanner J. Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K. Samuelson, Thomas W. Swan, Russell J. Ibach, Mitch Berdahl, John P. |
author_facet | Thompson, Vance M. Ferguson, Tanner J. Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K. Samuelson, Thomas W. Swan, Russell J. Ibach, Mitch Berdahl, John P. |
author_sort | Thompson, Vance M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Prospective, open-label, non-randomized, single site study to assess the safety and tolerability of a multi-pressure dial. METHODS: 30 healthy subjects received application of negative pressure (–15 mmHg) in one eye for 30 minutes and ambient atmospheric pressure in the contralateral eye. To evaluate safety, the primary outcome measures included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) changes from baseline, slit-lamp and dilated fundus examination findings, and rate of adverse events. Exploratory analyses included in this study also evaluated changes from baseline measurement in tear break-up time (TBUT) and RNFL thickness measured by OCT. In addition to baseline screening, subjects underwent testing and negative pressure application on day 0 and returned 1 week after the initial visit for clinical testing. The follow-up visit did not include use of the multi-pressure dial (MPD) but repeated baseline testing and evaluated for adverse events. RESULTS: No adverse events were reported in the study. After short-term wear of the MPD on day 0, there was a minimal but statistically significant increase of half a line (LogMAR) in BCDVA for study eyes; this increase was not present at 1 week. There were no observed changes in cup-disk ratio and TBUT 1 week after the initial testing. There was a statistically significant pressure reduction in both study and fellow eyes at 1 week following the study, but clinical significance has yet to be determined. CONCLUSION: The MPD, which consists of a pair of goggles connected to a handheld, programmable pump, was well tolerated by subjects enrolled in the study. Key safety parameters remained stable after short-term exposure. The favorable safety results of this study support the safety profile of the MPD and promote further investigation of the device as a potential treatment of glaucoma. FUNDING: Equinox Ophthalmic, Inc. (Newport Beach, CA). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6513913 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65139132019-05-28 Short-Term Safety Evaluation of a Multi-Pressure Dial: A Prospective, Open-label, Non-randomized Study Thompson, Vance M. Ferguson, Tanner J. Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K. Samuelson, Thomas W. Swan, Russell J. Ibach, Mitch Berdahl, John P. Ophthalmol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Prospective, open-label, non-randomized, single site study to assess the safety and tolerability of a multi-pressure dial. METHODS: 30 healthy subjects received application of negative pressure (–15 mmHg) in one eye for 30 minutes and ambient atmospheric pressure in the contralateral eye. To evaluate safety, the primary outcome measures included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) changes from baseline, slit-lamp and dilated fundus examination findings, and rate of adverse events. Exploratory analyses included in this study also evaluated changes from baseline measurement in tear break-up time (TBUT) and RNFL thickness measured by OCT. In addition to baseline screening, subjects underwent testing and negative pressure application on day 0 and returned 1 week after the initial visit for clinical testing. The follow-up visit did not include use of the multi-pressure dial (MPD) but repeated baseline testing and evaluated for adverse events. RESULTS: No adverse events were reported in the study. After short-term wear of the MPD on day 0, there was a minimal but statistically significant increase of half a line (LogMAR) in BCDVA for study eyes; this increase was not present at 1 week. There were no observed changes in cup-disk ratio and TBUT 1 week after the initial testing. There was a statistically significant pressure reduction in both study and fellow eyes at 1 week following the study, but clinical significance has yet to be determined. CONCLUSION: The MPD, which consists of a pair of goggles connected to a handheld, programmable pump, was well tolerated by subjects enrolled in the study. Key safety parameters remained stable after short-term exposure. The favorable safety results of this study support the safety profile of the MPD and promote further investigation of the device as a potential treatment of glaucoma. FUNDING: Equinox Ophthalmic, Inc. (Newport Beach, CA). Springer Healthcare 2019-03-27 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6513913/ /pubmed/30919318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0181-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Thompson, Vance M. Ferguson, Tanner J. Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K. Samuelson, Thomas W. Swan, Russell J. Ibach, Mitch Berdahl, John P. Short-Term Safety Evaluation of a Multi-Pressure Dial: A Prospective, Open-label, Non-randomized Study |
title | Short-Term Safety Evaluation of a Multi-Pressure Dial: A Prospective, Open-label, Non-randomized Study |
title_full | Short-Term Safety Evaluation of a Multi-Pressure Dial: A Prospective, Open-label, Non-randomized Study |
title_fullStr | Short-Term Safety Evaluation of a Multi-Pressure Dial: A Prospective, Open-label, Non-randomized Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Short-Term Safety Evaluation of a Multi-Pressure Dial: A Prospective, Open-label, Non-randomized Study |
title_short | Short-Term Safety Evaluation of a Multi-Pressure Dial: A Prospective, Open-label, Non-randomized Study |
title_sort | short-term safety evaluation of a multi-pressure dial: a prospective, open-label, non-randomized study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513913/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30919318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0181-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thompsonvancem shorttermsafetyevaluationofamultipressuredialaprospectiveopenlabelnonrandomizedstudy AT fergusontannerj shorttermsafetyevaluationofamultipressuredialaprospectiveopenlabelnonrandomizedstudy AT ahmediqbalikek shorttermsafetyevaluationofamultipressuredialaprospectiveopenlabelnonrandomizedstudy AT samuelsonthomasw shorttermsafetyevaluationofamultipressuredialaprospectiveopenlabelnonrandomizedstudy AT swanrussellj shorttermsafetyevaluationofamultipressuredialaprospectiveopenlabelnonrandomizedstudy AT ibachmitch shorttermsafetyevaluationofamultipressuredialaprospectiveopenlabelnonrandomizedstudy AT berdahljohnp shorttermsafetyevaluationofamultipressuredialaprospectiveopenlabelnonrandomizedstudy |