Cargando…

Short-Term Safety Evaluation of a Multi-Pressure Dial: A Prospective, Open-label, Non-randomized Study

INTRODUCTION: Prospective, open-label, non-randomized, single site study to assess the safety and tolerability of a multi-pressure dial. METHODS: 30 healthy subjects received application of negative pressure (–15 mmHg) in one eye for 30 minutes and ambient atmospheric pressure in the contralateral e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Vance M., Ferguson, Tanner J., Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K., Samuelson, Thomas W., Swan, Russell J., Ibach, Mitch, Berdahl, John P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30919318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0181-y
_version_ 1783417789420142592
author Thompson, Vance M.
Ferguson, Tanner J.
Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K.
Samuelson, Thomas W.
Swan, Russell J.
Ibach, Mitch
Berdahl, John P.
author_facet Thompson, Vance M.
Ferguson, Tanner J.
Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K.
Samuelson, Thomas W.
Swan, Russell J.
Ibach, Mitch
Berdahl, John P.
author_sort Thompson, Vance M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Prospective, open-label, non-randomized, single site study to assess the safety and tolerability of a multi-pressure dial. METHODS: 30 healthy subjects received application of negative pressure (–15 mmHg) in one eye for 30 minutes and ambient atmospheric pressure in the contralateral eye. To evaluate safety, the primary outcome measures included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) changes from baseline, slit-lamp and dilated fundus examination findings, and rate of adverse events. Exploratory analyses included in this study also evaluated changes from baseline measurement in tear break-up time (TBUT) and RNFL thickness measured by OCT. In addition to baseline screening, subjects underwent testing and negative pressure application on day 0 and returned 1 week after the initial visit for clinical testing. The follow-up visit did not include use of the multi-pressure dial (MPD) but repeated baseline testing and evaluated for adverse events. RESULTS: No adverse events were reported in the study. After short-term wear of the MPD on day 0, there was a minimal but statistically significant increase of half a line (LogMAR) in BCDVA for study eyes; this increase was not present at 1 week. There were no observed changes in cup-disk ratio and TBUT 1 week after the initial testing. There was a statistically significant pressure reduction in both study and fellow eyes at 1 week following the study, but clinical significance has yet to be determined. CONCLUSION: The MPD, which consists of a pair of goggles connected to a handheld, programmable pump, was well tolerated by subjects enrolled in the study. Key safety parameters remained stable after short-term exposure. The favorable safety results of this study support the safety profile of the MPD and promote further investigation of the device as a potential treatment of glaucoma. FUNDING: Equinox Ophthalmic, Inc. (Newport Beach, CA).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6513913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65139132019-05-28 Short-Term Safety Evaluation of a Multi-Pressure Dial: A Prospective, Open-label, Non-randomized Study Thompson, Vance M. Ferguson, Tanner J. Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K. Samuelson, Thomas W. Swan, Russell J. Ibach, Mitch Berdahl, John P. Ophthalmol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Prospective, open-label, non-randomized, single site study to assess the safety and tolerability of a multi-pressure dial. METHODS: 30 healthy subjects received application of negative pressure (–15 mmHg) in one eye for 30 minutes and ambient atmospheric pressure in the contralateral eye. To evaluate safety, the primary outcome measures included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) changes from baseline, slit-lamp and dilated fundus examination findings, and rate of adverse events. Exploratory analyses included in this study also evaluated changes from baseline measurement in tear break-up time (TBUT) and RNFL thickness measured by OCT. In addition to baseline screening, subjects underwent testing and negative pressure application on day 0 and returned 1 week after the initial visit for clinical testing. The follow-up visit did not include use of the multi-pressure dial (MPD) but repeated baseline testing and evaluated for adverse events. RESULTS: No adverse events were reported in the study. After short-term wear of the MPD on day 0, there was a minimal but statistically significant increase of half a line (LogMAR) in BCDVA for study eyes; this increase was not present at 1 week. There were no observed changes in cup-disk ratio and TBUT 1 week after the initial testing. There was a statistically significant pressure reduction in both study and fellow eyes at 1 week following the study, but clinical significance has yet to be determined. CONCLUSION: The MPD, which consists of a pair of goggles connected to a handheld, programmable pump, was well tolerated by subjects enrolled in the study. Key safety parameters remained stable after short-term exposure. The favorable safety results of this study support the safety profile of the MPD and promote further investigation of the device as a potential treatment of glaucoma. FUNDING: Equinox Ophthalmic, Inc. (Newport Beach, CA). Springer Healthcare 2019-03-27 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6513913/ /pubmed/30919318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0181-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Thompson, Vance M.
Ferguson, Tanner J.
Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K.
Samuelson, Thomas W.
Swan, Russell J.
Ibach, Mitch
Berdahl, John P.
Short-Term Safety Evaluation of a Multi-Pressure Dial: A Prospective, Open-label, Non-randomized Study
title Short-Term Safety Evaluation of a Multi-Pressure Dial: A Prospective, Open-label, Non-randomized Study
title_full Short-Term Safety Evaluation of a Multi-Pressure Dial: A Prospective, Open-label, Non-randomized Study
title_fullStr Short-Term Safety Evaluation of a Multi-Pressure Dial: A Prospective, Open-label, Non-randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed Short-Term Safety Evaluation of a Multi-Pressure Dial: A Prospective, Open-label, Non-randomized Study
title_short Short-Term Safety Evaluation of a Multi-Pressure Dial: A Prospective, Open-label, Non-randomized Study
title_sort short-term safety evaluation of a multi-pressure dial: a prospective, open-label, non-randomized study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30919318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0181-y
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonvancem shorttermsafetyevaluationofamultipressuredialaprospectiveopenlabelnonrandomizedstudy
AT fergusontannerj shorttermsafetyevaluationofamultipressuredialaprospectiveopenlabelnonrandomizedstudy
AT ahmediqbalikek shorttermsafetyevaluationofamultipressuredialaprospectiveopenlabelnonrandomizedstudy
AT samuelsonthomasw shorttermsafetyevaluationofamultipressuredialaprospectiveopenlabelnonrandomizedstudy
AT swanrussellj shorttermsafetyevaluationofamultipressuredialaprospectiveopenlabelnonrandomizedstudy
AT ibachmitch shorttermsafetyevaluationofamultipressuredialaprospectiveopenlabelnonrandomizedstudy
AT berdahljohnp shorttermsafetyevaluationofamultipressuredialaprospectiveopenlabelnonrandomizedstudy