Cargando…

A Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Device for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) poses a significant burden of disease worldwide, and identifying safe and effective non-pharmacologic treatment options for LBP is a research priority. The aim of this study was to pilot a clinical trial of a portable pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy devi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lisi, Anthony J., Scheinowitz, Mickey, Saporito, Richard, Onorato, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30868475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-019-0119-z
_version_ 1783417792438992896
author Lisi, Anthony J.
Scheinowitz, Mickey
Saporito, Richard
Onorato, Anthony
author_facet Lisi, Anthony J.
Scheinowitz, Mickey
Saporito, Richard
Onorato, Anthony
author_sort Lisi, Anthony J.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) poses a significant burden of disease worldwide, and identifying safe and effective non-pharmacologic treatment options for LBP is a research priority. The aim of this study was to pilot a clinical trial of a portable pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy device for subjects with mixed duration non-specific LBP. METHODS: This work was a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group study conducted at a chiropractic school outpatient clinic. The primary end point was functional capacity measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. Analysis was conducted on the intent-to-treat population and as a trend of change in pain scores over time using the Freidman test of repeated measures. RESULTS: Forty-two participants were randomized to receive usual care plus PEMF therapy or usual care plus sham, and 25 completed the study. Significant improvements in ODI scores from baseline to week 6 were reported in the experimental group (χ(2) = 14.68, p < 0.001, compared with patients in the sham group, χ(2) = 4.00, p = 0.135, n.s.). This difference persisted at week-12 follow-up. Adverse events were rare and mild. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to conduct a clinical trial of a PEMF therapy device for non-specific LBP. This work shows that the device was safe and provides preliminary evidence of effectiveness in improving function in patients with non-specific LBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03053375. FUNDING: Aerotel Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6513933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65139332019-05-28 A Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Device for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Lisi, Anthony J. Scheinowitz, Mickey Saporito, Richard Onorato, Anthony Pain Ther Brief Report INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) poses a significant burden of disease worldwide, and identifying safe and effective non-pharmacologic treatment options for LBP is a research priority. The aim of this study was to pilot a clinical trial of a portable pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy device for subjects with mixed duration non-specific LBP. METHODS: This work was a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group study conducted at a chiropractic school outpatient clinic. The primary end point was functional capacity measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. Analysis was conducted on the intent-to-treat population and as a trend of change in pain scores over time using the Freidman test of repeated measures. RESULTS: Forty-two participants were randomized to receive usual care plus PEMF therapy or usual care plus sham, and 25 completed the study. Significant improvements in ODI scores from baseline to week 6 were reported in the experimental group (χ(2) = 14.68, p < 0.001, compared with patients in the sham group, χ(2) = 4.00, p = 0.135, n.s.). This difference persisted at week-12 follow-up. Adverse events were rare and mild. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to conduct a clinical trial of a PEMF therapy device for non-specific LBP. This work shows that the device was safe and provides preliminary evidence of effectiveness in improving function in patients with non-specific LBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03053375. FUNDING: Aerotel Ltd. Springer Healthcare 2019-03-12 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6513933/ /pubmed/30868475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-019-0119-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Lisi, Anthony J.
Scheinowitz, Mickey
Saporito, Richard
Onorato, Anthony
A Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Device for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title A Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Device for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full A Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Device for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr A Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Device for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed A Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Device for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short A Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Device for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort pulsed electromagnetic field therapy device for non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30868475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-019-0119-z
work_keys_str_mv AT lisianthonyj apulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapydevicefornonspecificlowbackpainapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT scheinowitzmickey apulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapydevicefornonspecificlowbackpainapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT saporitorichard apulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapydevicefornonspecificlowbackpainapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT onoratoanthony apulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapydevicefornonspecificlowbackpainapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lisianthonyj pulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapydevicefornonspecificlowbackpainapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT scheinowitzmickey pulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapydevicefornonspecificlowbackpainapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT saporitorichard pulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapydevicefornonspecificlowbackpainapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT onoratoanthony pulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapydevicefornonspecificlowbackpainapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial