Cargando…

Anti-estrogen Treatment in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Hormonal therapy in endometrial cancer (EC) is used for patients who wish to preserve fertility and for patients with advanced or recurrent disease in a palliative setting. First line hormonal therapy consists of treatment with progestins, which has a response rate of 25% in an unselec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Weelden, Willem Jan, Massuger, Leon F. A. G., Pijnenborg, Johanna M. A., Romano, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31134155
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00359
_version_ 1783417799250542592
author van Weelden, Willem Jan
Massuger, Leon F. A. G.
Pijnenborg, Johanna M. A.
Romano, Andrea
author_facet van Weelden, Willem Jan
Massuger, Leon F. A. G.
Pijnenborg, Johanna M. A.
Romano, Andrea
author_sort van Weelden, Willem Jan
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Hormonal therapy in endometrial cancer (EC) is used for patients who wish to preserve fertility and for patients with advanced or recurrent disease in a palliative setting. First line hormonal therapy consists of treatment with progestins, which has a response rate of 25% in an unselected population. Treatment with anti-estrogens is an alternative hormonal therapy option, but there is limited data on the effect and side-effects of anti-estrogens in EC. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to investigate the response rate and toxicity of anti-estrogenic therapy in patients with endometrial cancer. Methods: A systematic search in electronic databases was performed to identify studies on selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM) and down-regulators (SERD) and aromatase inhibitors that reported on response rates (RR) among EC patients. Outcome in estrogen receptor (ER) positive and negative disease was assessed independently. Results: Sixteen studies on advanced stage and recurrent EC were included. Ten studies investigated anti-estrogen monotherapy and seven investigated a combination of anti-estrogenic drugs with either progestin or targeted treatment. Due to heterogeneity in patient population, no meta-analysis was performed. The median age of the patients in the included studies ranged from 61 to 71 years and the proportion of low grade tumors ranged from 38 to 80%. The RR for tamoxifen ranged from 10 to 53%, for other SERMs and SERDs 9–31%, for aromatase inhibitors from 8 to 9%, for combined tamoxifen/progestin treatment 19–58%, for combined chemo- and hormonal therapy 43% and for combination of anti-estrogenic treatment with mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors 14–31%. Toxicity consisted mainly of nausea and thrombotic events and was higher in combination therapy of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy and hormonal therapy and mTOR inhibitors compared to other therapies. Conclusion: Tamoxifen or a combination of tamoxifen and progestin should be the preferred choice when selecting second line hormonal treatment because the RRs are similar to first line progestin treatment and the toxicity is low. The response can be optimized by selecting patients with endometrioid tumors and positive estrogen receptor status, which should be based on a pretreatment biopsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6513972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65139722019-05-27 Anti-estrogen Treatment in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review van Weelden, Willem Jan Massuger, Leon F. A. G. Pijnenborg, Johanna M. A. Romano, Andrea Front Oncol Oncology Introduction: Hormonal therapy in endometrial cancer (EC) is used for patients who wish to preserve fertility and for patients with advanced or recurrent disease in a palliative setting. First line hormonal therapy consists of treatment with progestins, which has a response rate of 25% in an unselected population. Treatment with anti-estrogens is an alternative hormonal therapy option, but there is limited data on the effect and side-effects of anti-estrogens in EC. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to investigate the response rate and toxicity of anti-estrogenic therapy in patients with endometrial cancer. Methods: A systematic search in electronic databases was performed to identify studies on selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM) and down-regulators (SERD) and aromatase inhibitors that reported on response rates (RR) among EC patients. Outcome in estrogen receptor (ER) positive and negative disease was assessed independently. Results: Sixteen studies on advanced stage and recurrent EC were included. Ten studies investigated anti-estrogen monotherapy and seven investigated a combination of anti-estrogenic drugs with either progestin or targeted treatment. Due to heterogeneity in patient population, no meta-analysis was performed. The median age of the patients in the included studies ranged from 61 to 71 years and the proportion of low grade tumors ranged from 38 to 80%. The RR for tamoxifen ranged from 10 to 53%, for other SERMs and SERDs 9–31%, for aromatase inhibitors from 8 to 9%, for combined tamoxifen/progestin treatment 19–58%, for combined chemo- and hormonal therapy 43% and for combination of anti-estrogenic treatment with mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors 14–31%. Toxicity consisted mainly of nausea and thrombotic events and was higher in combination therapy of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy and hormonal therapy and mTOR inhibitors compared to other therapies. Conclusion: Tamoxifen or a combination of tamoxifen and progestin should be the preferred choice when selecting second line hormonal treatment because the RRs are similar to first line progestin treatment and the toxicity is low. The response can be optimized by selecting patients with endometrioid tumors and positive estrogen receptor status, which should be based on a pretreatment biopsy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6513972/ /pubmed/31134155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00359 Text en Copyright © 2019 van Weelden, Massuger, ENITEC, Pijnenborg and Romano. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
van Weelden, Willem Jan
Massuger, Leon F. A. G.
Pijnenborg, Johanna M. A.
Romano, Andrea
Anti-estrogen Treatment in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review
title Anti-estrogen Treatment in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_full Anti-estrogen Treatment in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Anti-estrogen Treatment in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Anti-estrogen Treatment in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_short Anti-estrogen Treatment in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_sort anti-estrogen treatment in endometrial cancer: a systematic review
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31134155
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00359
work_keys_str_mv AT vanweeldenwillemjan antiestrogentreatmentinendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT massugerleonfag antiestrogentreatmentinendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT antiestrogentreatmentinendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT pijnenborgjohannama antiestrogentreatmentinendometrialcancerasystematicreview
AT romanoandrea antiestrogentreatmentinendometrialcancerasystematicreview