Cargando…
Development of quality outcome indicators to improve the quality of urinary and faecal continence care
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Despite the range of treatment options available, relatively few people with incontinence find a total cure. The importance of daily management with toileting and containment cannot be underestimated. To our knowledge, there are no outcome measures to benchmark good care...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6514083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30327849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3768-2 |
_version_ | 1783417821780246528 |
---|---|
author | Wagg, Adrian Gove, Dianne Leichsenring, Kai Ostaszkiewicz, Joan |
author_facet | Wagg, Adrian Gove, Dianne Leichsenring, Kai Ostaszkiewicz, Joan |
author_sort | Wagg, Adrian |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Despite the range of treatment options available, relatively few people with incontinence find a total cure. The importance of daily management with toileting and containment cannot be underestimated. To our knowledge, there are no outcome measures to benchmark good care. The aim of this study was to create a set of key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure outcomes for toileting and containment. METHODS: An expert panel (EP) defined a set of KPIs using evidence from a scoping review, stakeholder engagement, and expert consensus. Peer reviewed articles, high-quality grey literature and international and national standards were reviewed to identify existing measures for management. These findings were augmented by an exercise involving patients, caregivers, nurses, clinicians, payers, policy makers and care providers to prioritise the findings and identify additional areas of interest. RESULTS: The final set of 14 KPIs includes quality indicators of process and outcome for those managed with a toileting and containment strategy and is relevant for both care-independent and -dependent persons. Rates of assessment, days waiting for specialist assessment, rates of return to work and those rating their quality of life as good or acceptable are captured. An indicator of well-being for caregivers and the economic costs of poor care are also defined. CONCLUSIONS: The set of KPIs to measure outcomes from toileting and containment strategies describes the components of each to encourage integration into existing quality frameworks. Each KPI has been refined and detailed to encourage this. If implemented, resulting benchmarking data will facilitate care quality improvement and inform value-based care procurement and provision of toileting and containment strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-018-3768-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6514083 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65140832019-05-28 Development of quality outcome indicators to improve the quality of urinary and faecal continence care Wagg, Adrian Gove, Dianne Leichsenring, Kai Ostaszkiewicz, Joan Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Despite the range of treatment options available, relatively few people with incontinence find a total cure. The importance of daily management with toileting and containment cannot be underestimated. To our knowledge, there are no outcome measures to benchmark good care. The aim of this study was to create a set of key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure outcomes for toileting and containment. METHODS: An expert panel (EP) defined a set of KPIs using evidence from a scoping review, stakeholder engagement, and expert consensus. Peer reviewed articles, high-quality grey literature and international and national standards were reviewed to identify existing measures for management. These findings were augmented by an exercise involving patients, caregivers, nurses, clinicians, payers, policy makers and care providers to prioritise the findings and identify additional areas of interest. RESULTS: The final set of 14 KPIs includes quality indicators of process and outcome for those managed with a toileting and containment strategy and is relevant for both care-independent and -dependent persons. Rates of assessment, days waiting for specialist assessment, rates of return to work and those rating their quality of life as good or acceptable are captured. An indicator of well-being for caregivers and the economic costs of poor care are also defined. CONCLUSIONS: The set of KPIs to measure outcomes from toileting and containment strategies describes the components of each to encourage integration into existing quality frameworks. Each KPI has been refined and detailed to encourage this. If implemented, resulting benchmarking data will facilitate care quality improvement and inform value-based care procurement and provision of toileting and containment strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-018-3768-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users Springer International Publishing 2018-10-16 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6514083/ /pubmed/30327849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3768-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wagg, Adrian Gove, Dianne Leichsenring, Kai Ostaszkiewicz, Joan Development of quality outcome indicators to improve the quality of urinary and faecal continence care |
title | Development of quality outcome indicators to improve the quality of urinary and faecal continence care |
title_full | Development of quality outcome indicators to improve the quality of urinary and faecal continence care |
title_fullStr | Development of quality outcome indicators to improve the quality of urinary and faecal continence care |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of quality outcome indicators to improve the quality of urinary and faecal continence care |
title_short | Development of quality outcome indicators to improve the quality of urinary and faecal continence care |
title_sort | development of quality outcome indicators to improve the quality of urinary and faecal continence care |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6514083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30327849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3768-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waggadrian developmentofqualityoutcomeindicatorstoimprovethequalityofurinaryandfaecalcontinencecare AT govedianne developmentofqualityoutcomeindicatorstoimprovethequalityofurinaryandfaecalcontinencecare AT leichsenringkai developmentofqualityoutcomeindicatorstoimprovethequalityofurinaryandfaecalcontinencecare AT ostaszkiewiczjoan developmentofqualityoutcomeindicatorstoimprovethequalityofurinaryandfaecalcontinencecare |