Cargando…

Touch-induced pupil size reflects stimulus intensity, not subjective pleasantness

Interpersonal touch is known to influence human communication and emotion. An important system for interpersonal touch is the C-tactile (CT) system, which is activated by a soft stroke on hairy skin with a velocity of 1–10 cms(−1). This system been proposed to play a unique role in hedonic valence a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Hooijdonk, Roel, Mathot, Sebastiaan, Schat, Evelien, Spencer, Hannah, van der Stigchel, Stefan, Dijkerman, H. Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6514109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30374784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5404-2
_version_ 1783417827535880192
author van Hooijdonk, Roel
Mathot, Sebastiaan
Schat, Evelien
Spencer, Hannah
van der Stigchel, Stefan
Dijkerman, H. Chris
author_facet van Hooijdonk, Roel
Mathot, Sebastiaan
Schat, Evelien
Spencer, Hannah
van der Stigchel, Stefan
Dijkerman, H. Chris
author_sort van Hooijdonk, Roel
collection PubMed
description Interpersonal touch is known to influence human communication and emotion. An important system for interpersonal touch is the C-tactile (CT) system, which is activated by a soft stroke on hairy skin with a velocity of 1–10 cms(−1). This system been proposed to play a unique role in hedonic valence and emotion of touch. For other sensory modalities, hedonic processing has been associated with pupil dilation. However, it is unclear whether pupil dilation can be modulated by hedonic touch. The current study investigated in two experiments how pupil size reacts to both affective and non-affective stroking. Pupil-size data were obtained to investigate differences between stroking conditions. In addition, an adjusted version of the Touch Perception Task (TPT) was used to assess subjective touch pleasantness ratings. In Experiment 1, affective (3 cms(−1)) and non-affective (0.3 and 30 cms(−1)) stroking was applied to the dorsal side of the right hand. Results revealed that stroking velocity had a significant effect on TPT-item scores, showing higher that affective touch was rated as more pleasant compared to non-affective touch, thereby replicating the previous studies. Results, however, revealed no specific pupil dilation for the 3 cms(−1) condition; instead, a logarithmic relation was found between pupil-size dilation and stroking velocity. This relation was confirmed in a second experiment. Furthermore, the palm of the hand was used as a control site for tactile stimulation, for which similar findings were obtained as for the dorsal side of the hand. In addition, skin conductance recordings showed a pattern of response to different stroking velocities similar to pupil dilation. These results suggest that pupil-size dilation does respond to tactile input, but that this response is related to arousal caused by changes in stimulus intensity (e.g., stroking velocity) rather than specific C-tactile stimulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6514109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65141092019-05-28 Touch-induced pupil size reflects stimulus intensity, not subjective pleasantness van Hooijdonk, Roel Mathot, Sebastiaan Schat, Evelien Spencer, Hannah van der Stigchel, Stefan Dijkerman, H. Chris Exp Brain Res Research Article Interpersonal touch is known to influence human communication and emotion. An important system for interpersonal touch is the C-tactile (CT) system, which is activated by a soft stroke on hairy skin with a velocity of 1–10 cms(−1). This system been proposed to play a unique role in hedonic valence and emotion of touch. For other sensory modalities, hedonic processing has been associated with pupil dilation. However, it is unclear whether pupil dilation can be modulated by hedonic touch. The current study investigated in two experiments how pupil size reacts to both affective and non-affective stroking. Pupil-size data were obtained to investigate differences between stroking conditions. In addition, an adjusted version of the Touch Perception Task (TPT) was used to assess subjective touch pleasantness ratings. In Experiment 1, affective (3 cms(−1)) and non-affective (0.3 and 30 cms(−1)) stroking was applied to the dorsal side of the right hand. Results revealed that stroking velocity had a significant effect on TPT-item scores, showing higher that affective touch was rated as more pleasant compared to non-affective touch, thereby replicating the previous studies. Results, however, revealed no specific pupil dilation for the 3 cms(−1) condition; instead, a logarithmic relation was found between pupil-size dilation and stroking velocity. This relation was confirmed in a second experiment. Furthermore, the palm of the hand was used as a control site for tactile stimulation, for which similar findings were obtained as for the dorsal side of the hand. In addition, skin conductance recordings showed a pattern of response to different stroking velocities similar to pupil dilation. These results suggest that pupil-size dilation does respond to tactile input, but that this response is related to arousal caused by changes in stimulus intensity (e.g., stroking velocity) rather than specific C-tactile stimulation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-10-29 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6514109/ /pubmed/30374784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5404-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Hooijdonk, Roel
Mathot, Sebastiaan
Schat, Evelien
Spencer, Hannah
van der Stigchel, Stefan
Dijkerman, H. Chris
Touch-induced pupil size reflects stimulus intensity, not subjective pleasantness
title Touch-induced pupil size reflects stimulus intensity, not subjective pleasantness
title_full Touch-induced pupil size reflects stimulus intensity, not subjective pleasantness
title_fullStr Touch-induced pupil size reflects stimulus intensity, not subjective pleasantness
title_full_unstemmed Touch-induced pupil size reflects stimulus intensity, not subjective pleasantness
title_short Touch-induced pupil size reflects stimulus intensity, not subjective pleasantness
title_sort touch-induced pupil size reflects stimulus intensity, not subjective pleasantness
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6514109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30374784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5404-2
work_keys_str_mv AT vanhooijdonkroel touchinducedpupilsizereflectsstimulusintensitynotsubjectivepleasantness
AT mathotsebastiaan touchinducedpupilsizereflectsstimulusintensitynotsubjectivepleasantness
AT schatevelien touchinducedpupilsizereflectsstimulusintensitynotsubjectivepleasantness
AT spencerhannah touchinducedpupilsizereflectsstimulusintensitynotsubjectivepleasantness
AT vanderstigchelstefan touchinducedpupilsizereflectsstimulusintensitynotsubjectivepleasantness
AT dijkermanhchris touchinducedpupilsizereflectsstimulusintensitynotsubjectivepleasantness