Cargando…

Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction Using Different Grafting Techniques

BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate CLP is a frequent congenital malformation that manifests in several varieties including unilateral or bilateral anomalies due to either genetic or acquired causes. Alveolar cleft graft ACG remains controversial as regard timing, grafting materials and surgical techni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mossaad, Aida, Badry, Tarek El, Abdelrahaman, Moustapha, Abdelazim, Ahmed, Ghanem, Wael, Hassan, Susan, Adly, Nahed, Shawkat, Wael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Republic of Macedonia 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6514340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31110587
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.236
_version_ 1783417871873867776
author Mossaad, Aida
Badry, Tarek El
Abdelrahaman, Moustapha
Abdelazim, Ahmed
Ghanem, Wael
Hassan, Susan
Adly, Nahed
Shawkat, Wael
author_facet Mossaad, Aida
Badry, Tarek El
Abdelrahaman, Moustapha
Abdelazim, Ahmed
Ghanem, Wael
Hassan, Susan
Adly, Nahed
Shawkat, Wael
author_sort Mossaad, Aida
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate CLP is a frequent congenital malformation that manifests in several varieties including unilateral or bilateral anomalies due to either genetic or acquired causes. Alveolar cleft graft ACG remains controversial as regard timing, grafting materials and surgical techniques. The primary goal of alveolar cleft grafting in ACG patients is to provide an intact bony ridge at the cleft site to allow maxillary continuity for teeth eruption, proper orthodontic treatment for dental arch alignment, oronasal fistula closure and providing alar support for nasal symmetry. AIM: This study aims to compare different grafting techniques to treat the alveolar cleft defect. METHODS: This study included 24 cases divided into three groups of patients: Group A was treated with autogenous iliac crest bone; Group B was treated with nano calcium hydroxyapatite with collagen membrane and Group C was treated with tissue engineering method using bone marrow stem cells extract and PRF membrane. RESULTS: According to clinical and radiographic examination measuring bone density in the CT preoperatively compared to six months postoperatively. Group C with bone marrow stem cells extract showed superior results among all followed by group B, while group A with autogenous iliac crest showed resorption in some cases and gave the least values, in addition to its drawbacks as regard donor site affection with pain & scar formation. CONCLUSION: Bone substitutes as Nano calcium hydroxyapatite and bone marrow stem cells extract showed to be reliable methods for bone grafting than autogenous iliac crest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6514340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Republic of Macedonia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65143402019-05-20 Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction Using Different Grafting Techniques Mossaad, Aida Badry, Tarek El Abdelrahaman, Moustapha Abdelazim, Ahmed Ghanem, Wael Hassan, Susan Adly, Nahed Shawkat, Wael Open Access Maced J Med Sci Dental Science BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate CLP is a frequent congenital malformation that manifests in several varieties including unilateral or bilateral anomalies due to either genetic or acquired causes. Alveolar cleft graft ACG remains controversial as regard timing, grafting materials and surgical techniques. The primary goal of alveolar cleft grafting in ACG patients is to provide an intact bony ridge at the cleft site to allow maxillary continuity for teeth eruption, proper orthodontic treatment for dental arch alignment, oronasal fistula closure and providing alar support for nasal symmetry. AIM: This study aims to compare different grafting techniques to treat the alveolar cleft defect. METHODS: This study included 24 cases divided into three groups of patients: Group A was treated with autogenous iliac crest bone; Group B was treated with nano calcium hydroxyapatite with collagen membrane and Group C was treated with tissue engineering method using bone marrow stem cells extract and PRF membrane. RESULTS: According to clinical and radiographic examination measuring bone density in the CT preoperatively compared to six months postoperatively. Group C with bone marrow stem cells extract showed superior results among all followed by group B, while group A with autogenous iliac crest showed resorption in some cases and gave the least values, in addition to its drawbacks as regard donor site affection with pain & scar formation. CONCLUSION: Bone substitutes as Nano calcium hydroxyapatite and bone marrow stem cells extract showed to be reliable methods for bone grafting than autogenous iliac crest. Republic of Macedonia 2019-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6514340/ /pubmed/31110587 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.236 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Aida Mossaad, Tarek El Badry, Moustapha Abdelrahaman, Ahmed Abdelazim, Wael Ghanem, Susan Hassan, Nahed Adly, Wael Shawkat. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY-NC/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
spellingShingle Dental Science
Mossaad, Aida
Badry, Tarek El
Abdelrahaman, Moustapha
Abdelazim, Ahmed
Ghanem, Wael
Hassan, Susan
Adly, Nahed
Shawkat, Wael
Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction Using Different Grafting Techniques
title Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction Using Different Grafting Techniques
title_full Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction Using Different Grafting Techniques
title_fullStr Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction Using Different Grafting Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction Using Different Grafting Techniques
title_short Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction Using Different Grafting Techniques
title_sort alveolar cleft reconstruction using different grafting techniques
topic Dental Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6514340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31110587
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.236
work_keys_str_mv AT mossaadaida alveolarcleftreconstructionusingdifferentgraftingtechniques
AT badrytarekel alveolarcleftreconstructionusingdifferentgraftingtechniques
AT abdelrahamanmoustapha alveolarcleftreconstructionusingdifferentgraftingtechniques
AT abdelazimahmed alveolarcleftreconstructionusingdifferentgraftingtechniques
AT ghanemwael alveolarcleftreconstructionusingdifferentgraftingtechniques
AT hassansusan alveolarcleftreconstructionusingdifferentgraftingtechniques
AT adlynahed alveolarcleftreconstructionusingdifferentgraftingtechniques
AT shawkatwael alveolarcleftreconstructionusingdifferentgraftingtechniques