Cargando…

Microgrooves and Microrugosities in Titanium Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation

The physical characteristics of an implant surface can determine and/or facilitate osseointegration processes. In this sense, a new implant surface with microgrooves associated with plus double acid treatment to generate roughness was evaluated and compared in vitro and in vivo with a non-treated (s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre, Cavalcanti de Lima, José Henrique, Rodriguez, Fernando, Calvo-Guirado, José Luis, Aramburú Júnior, Jaime, Pérez-Díaz, Leticia, Mazón, Patricia, Aragoneses, Juan Manuel, De Aza, Piedad N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6514748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31010110
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12081287
_version_ 1783417932915671040
author Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre
Cavalcanti de Lima, José Henrique
Rodriguez, Fernando
Calvo-Guirado, José Luis
Aramburú Júnior, Jaime
Pérez-Díaz, Leticia
Mazón, Patricia
Aragoneses, Juan Manuel
De Aza, Piedad N.
author_facet Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre
Cavalcanti de Lima, José Henrique
Rodriguez, Fernando
Calvo-Guirado, José Luis
Aramburú Júnior, Jaime
Pérez-Díaz, Leticia
Mazón, Patricia
Aragoneses, Juan Manuel
De Aza, Piedad N.
author_sort Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre
collection PubMed
description The physical characteristics of an implant surface can determine and/or facilitate osseointegration processes. In this sense, a new implant surface with microgrooves associated with plus double acid treatment to generate roughness was evaluated and compared in vitro and in vivo with a non-treated (smooth) and double acid surface treatment. Thirty disks and thirty-six conical implants manufactured from commercially pure titanium (grade IV) were prepared for this study. Three groups were determined, as described below: Group 1 (G1), where the samples were only machined; group 2 (G2), where the samples were machined and had their surface treated to generate roughness; and test group 3 (G3), where the samples were machined with microgrooves and the surface was treated to generate the roughness. For the in vitro analysis, the samples were submitted to scanning microscopy (SEM), surface profilometry, the atomic force microscope (MFA) and the surface energy test. For the in vivo analyses, thirty-six implants were placed in the tibia of 9 New Zealand rabbits in a randomized manner, after histological and histomorphometric analysis, to determine the level of contact between the bone and implant (BIC%) and the bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO%) inside of the threads. The data collected were statistically analyzed between groups (p < 0.05). The in vitro evaluations showed different roughness patterns between the groups, and the G3 group had the highest values. In vivo evaluations of the BIC% showed 50.45 ± 9.57% for the G1 group, 55.32 ± 10.31% for the G2 group and 68.65 ± 9.98% for the G3 group, with significant statistical difference between the groups (p < 0.0001). In the BAFO% values, the G1 group presented 54.97 ± 9.56%, the G2 group 59.09 ± 10.13% and the G3 group 70.12 ± 11.07%, with statistical difference between the groups (p < 0.001). The results obtained in the evaluations show that the surface with microgrooves stimulates the process of osseointegration, accelerating the healing process, increasing the contact between the bone and the implant and the area of new bone formation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6514748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65147482019-05-31 Microgrooves and Microrugosities in Titanium Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre Cavalcanti de Lima, José Henrique Rodriguez, Fernando Calvo-Guirado, José Luis Aramburú Júnior, Jaime Pérez-Díaz, Leticia Mazón, Patricia Aragoneses, Juan Manuel De Aza, Piedad N. Materials (Basel) Article The physical characteristics of an implant surface can determine and/or facilitate osseointegration processes. In this sense, a new implant surface with microgrooves associated with plus double acid treatment to generate roughness was evaluated and compared in vitro and in vivo with a non-treated (smooth) and double acid surface treatment. Thirty disks and thirty-six conical implants manufactured from commercially pure titanium (grade IV) were prepared for this study. Three groups were determined, as described below: Group 1 (G1), where the samples were only machined; group 2 (G2), where the samples were machined and had their surface treated to generate roughness; and test group 3 (G3), where the samples were machined with microgrooves and the surface was treated to generate the roughness. For the in vitro analysis, the samples were submitted to scanning microscopy (SEM), surface profilometry, the atomic force microscope (MFA) and the surface energy test. For the in vivo analyses, thirty-six implants were placed in the tibia of 9 New Zealand rabbits in a randomized manner, after histological and histomorphometric analysis, to determine the level of contact between the bone and implant (BIC%) and the bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO%) inside of the threads. The data collected were statistically analyzed between groups (p < 0.05). The in vitro evaluations showed different roughness patterns between the groups, and the G3 group had the highest values. In vivo evaluations of the BIC% showed 50.45 ± 9.57% for the G1 group, 55.32 ± 10.31% for the G2 group and 68.65 ± 9.98% for the G3 group, with significant statistical difference between the groups (p < 0.0001). In the BAFO% values, the G1 group presented 54.97 ± 9.56%, the G2 group 59.09 ± 10.13% and the G3 group 70.12 ± 11.07%, with statistical difference between the groups (p < 0.001). The results obtained in the evaluations show that the surface with microgrooves stimulates the process of osseointegration, accelerating the healing process, increasing the contact between the bone and the implant and the area of new bone formation. MDPI 2019-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6514748/ /pubmed/31010110 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12081287 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre
Cavalcanti de Lima, José Henrique
Rodriguez, Fernando
Calvo-Guirado, José Luis
Aramburú Júnior, Jaime
Pérez-Díaz, Leticia
Mazón, Patricia
Aragoneses, Juan Manuel
De Aza, Piedad N.
Microgrooves and Microrugosities in Titanium Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation
title Microgrooves and Microrugosities in Titanium Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation
title_full Microgrooves and Microrugosities in Titanium Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation
title_fullStr Microgrooves and Microrugosities in Titanium Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Microgrooves and Microrugosities in Titanium Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation
title_short Microgrooves and Microrugosities in Titanium Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation
title_sort microgrooves and microrugosities in titanium implant surfaces: an in vitro and in vivo evaluation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6514748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31010110
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12081287
work_keys_str_mv AT gehrkesergioalexandre microgroovesandmicrorugositiesintitaniumimplantsurfacesaninvitroandinvivoevaluation
AT cavalcantidelimajosehenrique microgroovesandmicrorugositiesintitaniumimplantsurfacesaninvitroandinvivoevaluation
AT rodriguezfernando microgroovesandmicrorugositiesintitaniumimplantsurfacesaninvitroandinvivoevaluation
AT calvoguiradojoseluis microgroovesandmicrorugositiesintitaniumimplantsurfacesaninvitroandinvivoevaluation
AT aramburujuniorjaime microgroovesandmicrorugositiesintitaniumimplantsurfacesaninvitroandinvivoevaluation
AT perezdiazleticia microgroovesandmicrorugositiesintitaniumimplantsurfacesaninvitroandinvivoevaluation
AT mazonpatricia microgroovesandmicrorugositiesintitaniumimplantsurfacesaninvitroandinvivoevaluation
AT aragonesesjuanmanuel microgroovesandmicrorugositiesintitaniumimplantsurfacesaninvitroandinvivoevaluation
AT deazapiedadn microgroovesandmicrorugositiesintitaniumimplantsurfacesaninvitroandinvivoevaluation