Cargando…

Review and Evaluation of MAC Protocols for Satellite IoT Systems Using Nanosatellites

Extending the internet of things (IoT) networks to remote areas under extreme conditions or for serving sometimes unpredictable mobile applications has increased the need for satellite technology to provide effective connectivity. However, existent medium access control (MAC) protocols deployed in c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrer, Tomás, Céspedes, Sandra, Becerra, Alex
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6515444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31027250
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19081947
_version_ 1783418093527105536
author Ferrer, Tomás
Céspedes, Sandra
Becerra, Alex
author_facet Ferrer, Tomás
Céspedes, Sandra
Becerra, Alex
author_sort Ferrer, Tomás
collection PubMed
description Extending the internet of things (IoT) networks to remote areas under extreme conditions or for serving sometimes unpredictable mobile applications has increased the need for satellite technology to provide effective connectivity. However, existent medium access control (MAC) protocols deployed in commercial satellite networks were not designed to offer scalable solutions for the increasing number of devices predicted for IoT in the near future, nor do they consider other specific IoT characteristics. In particular, CubeSats—a low-cost solution for space technology—have the potential to become a wireless access network for the IoT, if additional requirements, including simplicity and low demands in processing, storage, and energy consumption are incorporated into MAC protocol design for satellite IoT systems. Here we review MAC protocols employed or proposed for satellite systems and evaluate their performance considering the IoT scenario along with the trend of using CubeSats for IoT connectivity. Criteria include channel load, throughput, energy efficiency, and complexity. We have found that Aloha-based protocols and interference cancellation-based protocols stand out on some of the performance metrics. However, the tradeoffs among communications performance, energy consumption, and complexity require improvements in future designs, for which we identify specific challenges and open research areas for MAC protocols deployed with next low-cost nanosatellite IoT systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6515444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65154442019-05-30 Review and Evaluation of MAC Protocols for Satellite IoT Systems Using Nanosatellites Ferrer, Tomás Céspedes, Sandra Becerra, Alex Sensors (Basel) Review Extending the internet of things (IoT) networks to remote areas under extreme conditions or for serving sometimes unpredictable mobile applications has increased the need for satellite technology to provide effective connectivity. However, existent medium access control (MAC) protocols deployed in commercial satellite networks were not designed to offer scalable solutions for the increasing number of devices predicted for IoT in the near future, nor do they consider other specific IoT characteristics. In particular, CubeSats—a low-cost solution for space technology—have the potential to become a wireless access network for the IoT, if additional requirements, including simplicity and low demands in processing, storage, and energy consumption are incorporated into MAC protocol design for satellite IoT systems. Here we review MAC protocols employed or proposed for satellite systems and evaluate their performance considering the IoT scenario along with the trend of using CubeSats for IoT connectivity. Criteria include channel load, throughput, energy efficiency, and complexity. We have found that Aloha-based protocols and interference cancellation-based protocols stand out on some of the performance metrics. However, the tradeoffs among communications performance, energy consumption, and complexity require improvements in future designs, for which we identify specific challenges and open research areas for MAC protocols deployed with next low-cost nanosatellite IoT systems. MDPI 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6515444/ /pubmed/31027250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19081947 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Ferrer, Tomás
Céspedes, Sandra
Becerra, Alex
Review and Evaluation of MAC Protocols for Satellite IoT Systems Using Nanosatellites
title Review and Evaluation of MAC Protocols for Satellite IoT Systems Using Nanosatellites
title_full Review and Evaluation of MAC Protocols for Satellite IoT Systems Using Nanosatellites
title_fullStr Review and Evaluation of MAC Protocols for Satellite IoT Systems Using Nanosatellites
title_full_unstemmed Review and Evaluation of MAC Protocols for Satellite IoT Systems Using Nanosatellites
title_short Review and Evaluation of MAC Protocols for Satellite IoT Systems Using Nanosatellites
title_sort review and evaluation of mac protocols for satellite iot systems using nanosatellites
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6515444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31027250
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19081947
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrertomas reviewandevaluationofmacprotocolsforsatelliteiotsystemsusingnanosatellites
AT cespedessandra reviewandevaluationofmacprotocolsforsatelliteiotsystemsusingnanosatellites
AT becerraalex reviewandevaluationofmacprotocolsforsatelliteiotsystemsusingnanosatellites