Cargando…
Review and Evaluation of MAC Protocols for Satellite IoT Systems Using Nanosatellites
Extending the internet of things (IoT) networks to remote areas under extreme conditions or for serving sometimes unpredictable mobile applications has increased the need for satellite technology to provide effective connectivity. However, existent medium access control (MAC) protocols deployed in c...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6515444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31027250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19081947 |
_version_ | 1783418093527105536 |
---|---|
author | Ferrer, Tomás Céspedes, Sandra Becerra, Alex |
author_facet | Ferrer, Tomás Céspedes, Sandra Becerra, Alex |
author_sort | Ferrer, Tomás |
collection | PubMed |
description | Extending the internet of things (IoT) networks to remote areas under extreme conditions or for serving sometimes unpredictable mobile applications has increased the need for satellite technology to provide effective connectivity. However, existent medium access control (MAC) protocols deployed in commercial satellite networks were not designed to offer scalable solutions for the increasing number of devices predicted for IoT in the near future, nor do they consider other specific IoT characteristics. In particular, CubeSats—a low-cost solution for space technology—have the potential to become a wireless access network for the IoT, if additional requirements, including simplicity and low demands in processing, storage, and energy consumption are incorporated into MAC protocol design for satellite IoT systems. Here we review MAC protocols employed or proposed for satellite systems and evaluate their performance considering the IoT scenario along with the trend of using CubeSats for IoT connectivity. Criteria include channel load, throughput, energy efficiency, and complexity. We have found that Aloha-based protocols and interference cancellation-based protocols stand out on some of the performance metrics. However, the tradeoffs among communications performance, energy consumption, and complexity require improvements in future designs, for which we identify specific challenges and open research areas for MAC protocols deployed with next low-cost nanosatellite IoT systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6515444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65154442019-05-30 Review and Evaluation of MAC Protocols for Satellite IoT Systems Using Nanosatellites Ferrer, Tomás Céspedes, Sandra Becerra, Alex Sensors (Basel) Review Extending the internet of things (IoT) networks to remote areas under extreme conditions or for serving sometimes unpredictable mobile applications has increased the need for satellite technology to provide effective connectivity. However, existent medium access control (MAC) protocols deployed in commercial satellite networks were not designed to offer scalable solutions for the increasing number of devices predicted for IoT in the near future, nor do they consider other specific IoT characteristics. In particular, CubeSats—a low-cost solution for space technology—have the potential to become a wireless access network for the IoT, if additional requirements, including simplicity and low demands in processing, storage, and energy consumption are incorporated into MAC protocol design for satellite IoT systems. Here we review MAC protocols employed or proposed for satellite systems and evaluate their performance considering the IoT scenario along with the trend of using CubeSats for IoT connectivity. Criteria include channel load, throughput, energy efficiency, and complexity. We have found that Aloha-based protocols and interference cancellation-based protocols stand out on some of the performance metrics. However, the tradeoffs among communications performance, energy consumption, and complexity require improvements in future designs, for which we identify specific challenges and open research areas for MAC protocols deployed with next low-cost nanosatellite IoT systems. MDPI 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6515444/ /pubmed/31027250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19081947 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Ferrer, Tomás Céspedes, Sandra Becerra, Alex Review and Evaluation of MAC Protocols for Satellite IoT Systems Using Nanosatellites |
title | Review and Evaluation of MAC Protocols for Satellite IoT Systems Using Nanosatellites |
title_full | Review and Evaluation of MAC Protocols for Satellite IoT Systems Using Nanosatellites |
title_fullStr | Review and Evaluation of MAC Protocols for Satellite IoT Systems Using Nanosatellites |
title_full_unstemmed | Review and Evaluation of MAC Protocols for Satellite IoT Systems Using Nanosatellites |
title_short | Review and Evaluation of MAC Protocols for Satellite IoT Systems Using Nanosatellites |
title_sort | review and evaluation of mac protocols for satellite iot systems using nanosatellites |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6515444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31027250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19081947 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferrertomas reviewandevaluationofmacprotocolsforsatelliteiotsystemsusingnanosatellites AT cespedessandra reviewandevaluationofmacprotocolsforsatelliteiotsystemsusingnanosatellites AT becerraalex reviewandevaluationofmacprotocolsforsatelliteiotsystemsusingnanosatellites |