Cargando…
Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study
BACKGROUND: Summer student research programs (SSRPs) serve to generate student interest in research and a clinician-scientist career path. This study sought to understand the composition of existing medically-related Canadian SSRPs, describe the current selection, education and evaluation practices...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6515625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31088445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1577-z |
_version_ | 1783418118598557696 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Sagar Walsh, Catharine M. Udell, Jacob A. |
author_facet | Patel, Sagar Walsh, Catharine M. Udell, Jacob A. |
author_sort | Patel, Sagar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Summer student research programs (SSRPs) serve to generate student interest in research and a clinician-scientist career path. This study sought to understand the composition of existing medically-related Canadian SSRPs, describe the current selection, education and evaluation practices and highlight opportunities for improvement. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study among English-language-based medically-related Canadian SSRPs for undergraduate and medical students was conducted. Programs were systematically identified through academic and/or institutional websites. The survey, administered between June–August 2016, collected information on program demographics, competition, selection, student experience, and program self-evaluation. RESULTS: Forty-six of 91 (50.5%) identified programs responded. These SSRPs collectively offered 1842 positions with a mean 3.76 applicants per placement. Most programs (78.3%, n = 36/46) required students to independently secure a research supervisor. A formal curriculum existed among 61.4% (n = 27/44) of programs. Few programs (5.9%, n = 2/34) offered an integrated clinical observership. Regarding evaluation, 11.4% (n = 5/44) of programs tracked subsequent research productivity and 27.5% (n = 11/40) conducted long-term impact assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Canadian SSRPs are highly competitive with the responsibility of selection primarily with the individual research supervisor rather than a centralized committee. Most programs offered students opportunities to develop both research and communication skills. Presently, the majority of programs do not have a sufficient evaluation component. These findings indicate that SSRPs may benefit from refinement of selection processes and more robust evaluation of their utility. To address this challenge, the authors describe a logic model that provides a set of core outcomes which can be applied as a framework to guide program evaluation of SSRPs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1577-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6515625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65156252019-05-21 Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study Patel, Sagar Walsh, Catharine M. Udell, Jacob A. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Summer student research programs (SSRPs) serve to generate student interest in research and a clinician-scientist career path. This study sought to understand the composition of existing medically-related Canadian SSRPs, describe the current selection, education and evaluation practices and highlight opportunities for improvement. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study among English-language-based medically-related Canadian SSRPs for undergraduate and medical students was conducted. Programs were systematically identified through academic and/or institutional websites. The survey, administered between June–August 2016, collected information on program demographics, competition, selection, student experience, and program self-evaluation. RESULTS: Forty-six of 91 (50.5%) identified programs responded. These SSRPs collectively offered 1842 positions with a mean 3.76 applicants per placement. Most programs (78.3%, n = 36/46) required students to independently secure a research supervisor. A formal curriculum existed among 61.4% (n = 27/44) of programs. Few programs (5.9%, n = 2/34) offered an integrated clinical observership. Regarding evaluation, 11.4% (n = 5/44) of programs tracked subsequent research productivity and 27.5% (n = 11/40) conducted long-term impact assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Canadian SSRPs are highly competitive with the responsibility of selection primarily with the individual research supervisor rather than a centralized committee. Most programs offered students opportunities to develop both research and communication skills. Presently, the majority of programs do not have a sufficient evaluation component. These findings indicate that SSRPs may benefit from refinement of selection processes and more robust evaluation of their utility. To address this challenge, the authors describe a logic model that provides a set of core outcomes which can be applied as a framework to guide program evaluation of SSRPs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1577-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6515625/ /pubmed/31088445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1577-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Patel, Sagar Walsh, Catharine M. Udell, Jacob A. Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study |
title | Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study |
title_full | Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study |
title_fullStr | Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study |
title_short | Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study |
title_sort | exploring medically-related canadian summer student research programs: a national cross-sectional survey study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6515625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31088445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1577-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelsagar exploringmedicallyrelatedcanadiansummerstudentresearchprogramsanationalcrosssectionalsurveystudy AT walshcatharinem exploringmedicallyrelatedcanadiansummerstudentresearchprogramsanationalcrosssectionalsurveystudy AT udelljacoba exploringmedicallyrelatedcanadiansummerstudentresearchprogramsanationalcrosssectionalsurveystudy |