Cargando…

Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study

BACKGROUND: Summer student research programs (SSRPs) serve to generate student interest in research and a clinician-scientist career path. This study sought to understand the composition of existing medically-related Canadian SSRPs, describe the current selection, education and evaluation practices...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Sagar, Walsh, Catharine M., Udell, Jacob A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6515625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31088445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1577-z
_version_ 1783418118598557696
author Patel, Sagar
Walsh, Catharine M.
Udell, Jacob A.
author_facet Patel, Sagar
Walsh, Catharine M.
Udell, Jacob A.
author_sort Patel, Sagar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Summer student research programs (SSRPs) serve to generate student interest in research and a clinician-scientist career path. This study sought to understand the composition of existing medically-related Canadian SSRPs, describe the current selection, education and evaluation practices and highlight opportunities for improvement. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study among English-language-based medically-related Canadian SSRPs for undergraduate and medical students was conducted. Programs were systematically identified through academic and/or institutional websites. The survey, administered between June–August 2016, collected information on program demographics, competition, selection, student experience, and program self-evaluation. RESULTS: Forty-six of 91 (50.5%) identified programs responded. These SSRPs collectively offered 1842 positions with a mean 3.76 applicants per placement. Most programs (78.3%, n = 36/46) required students to independently secure a research supervisor. A formal curriculum existed among 61.4% (n = 27/44) of programs. Few programs (5.9%, n = 2/34) offered an integrated clinical observership. Regarding evaluation, 11.4% (n = 5/44) of programs tracked subsequent research productivity and 27.5% (n = 11/40) conducted long-term impact assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Canadian SSRPs are highly competitive with the responsibility of selection primarily with the individual research supervisor rather than a centralized committee. Most programs offered students opportunities to develop both research and communication skills. Presently, the majority of programs do not have a sufficient evaluation component. These findings indicate that SSRPs may benefit from refinement of selection processes and more robust evaluation of their utility. To address this challenge, the authors describe a logic model that provides a set of core outcomes which can be applied as a framework to guide program evaluation of SSRPs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1577-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6515625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65156252019-05-21 Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study Patel, Sagar Walsh, Catharine M. Udell, Jacob A. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Summer student research programs (SSRPs) serve to generate student interest in research and a clinician-scientist career path. This study sought to understand the composition of existing medically-related Canadian SSRPs, describe the current selection, education and evaluation practices and highlight opportunities for improvement. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study among English-language-based medically-related Canadian SSRPs for undergraduate and medical students was conducted. Programs were systematically identified through academic and/or institutional websites. The survey, administered between June–August 2016, collected information on program demographics, competition, selection, student experience, and program self-evaluation. RESULTS: Forty-six of 91 (50.5%) identified programs responded. These SSRPs collectively offered 1842 positions with a mean 3.76 applicants per placement. Most programs (78.3%, n = 36/46) required students to independently secure a research supervisor. A formal curriculum existed among 61.4% (n = 27/44) of programs. Few programs (5.9%, n = 2/34) offered an integrated clinical observership. Regarding evaluation, 11.4% (n = 5/44) of programs tracked subsequent research productivity and 27.5% (n = 11/40) conducted long-term impact assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Canadian SSRPs are highly competitive with the responsibility of selection primarily with the individual research supervisor rather than a centralized committee. Most programs offered students opportunities to develop both research and communication skills. Presently, the majority of programs do not have a sufficient evaluation component. These findings indicate that SSRPs may benefit from refinement of selection processes and more robust evaluation of their utility. To address this challenge, the authors describe a logic model that provides a set of core outcomes which can be applied as a framework to guide program evaluation of SSRPs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1577-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6515625/ /pubmed/31088445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1577-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Patel, Sagar
Walsh, Catharine M.
Udell, Jacob A.
Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study
title Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study
title_full Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study
title_fullStr Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study
title_full_unstemmed Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study
title_short Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study
title_sort exploring medically-related canadian summer student research programs: a national cross-sectional survey study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6515625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31088445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1577-z
work_keys_str_mv AT patelsagar exploringmedicallyrelatedcanadiansummerstudentresearchprogramsanationalcrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT walshcatharinem exploringmedicallyrelatedcanadiansummerstudentresearchprogramsanationalcrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT udelljacoba exploringmedicallyrelatedcanadiansummerstudentresearchprogramsanationalcrosssectionalsurveystudy