Cargando…
Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore
INTRODUCTION: The Wertheim's radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH) has been the traditional surgical approach for operable Stage IB cervical cancer in Singapore whereas total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) was introduced only in 2009. In this study, we aimed to compare the long-term su...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6515754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31143623 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_43_18 |
_version_ | 1783418147784622080 |
---|---|
author | Lim, Timothy Yong Kuei Lin, Krystal Koh Miao Wong, Wai Loong Aggarwal, Ieera Madan Yam, Philip Kwai Lam |
author_facet | Lim, Timothy Yong Kuei Lin, Krystal Koh Miao Wong, Wai Loong Aggarwal, Ieera Madan Yam, Philip Kwai Lam |
author_sort | Lim, Timothy Yong Kuei |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The Wertheim's radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH) has been the traditional surgical approach for operable Stage IB cervical cancer in Singapore whereas total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) was introduced only in 2009. In this study, we aimed to compare the long-term surgical outcome between the two routes of surgery in our center. METHODS: This is a prospective study performed in a single large tertiary institution in Singapore. Inclusion criteria included surgically fit patients with early cervical cancer and no radiological evidence of regional or distant metastases. RESULTS: From November 2009 to December 2014, 51 TLRHs and 85 RAHs were performed. Median blood loss in the TLRH group was significantly lower than in the RAH group (300 vs. 500 mL; P = 0.002) as was median hospital stay (5 vs. 6 days; P = 0.001). Operative time was significantly higher in the TLRH group (262 vs. 228 min; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in bladder recovery. Intraoperative complications were encountered in 2 (3.9%) TLRH patients and 1 (1.2%) RAH patient. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 (5.9%) TLRH patients and 8 (9.4%) RAH patients. With a median follow-up of 117 (range 1.6–314.6) weeks in the TLRH group and 143.3 (range 0.4–304.7) weeks in the RAH group, 9 (17.6%) TLRH patients and 7 (8.2%) RAH patients had recurrence. There was no significant difference in the overall 3-year survival between the TLRH group and the RAH group for tumor size ≤2 cm (100.0% vs. 97.0%; P = 0.37). However, there was a trend toward lower survival for the TLRH group for tumor size >2 cm (61.9% vs. 85.4%; P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that with appropriate patient selection, TLRH can be a safe and effective procedure for the management of early cervical cancer in Singapore, especially in women with small tumors ≤2 cm but should be used with caution in women with larger tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6515754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65157542019-05-29 Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore Lim, Timothy Yong Kuei Lin, Krystal Koh Miao Wong, Wai Loong Aggarwal, Ieera Madan Yam, Philip Kwai Lam Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther Original Article INTRODUCTION: The Wertheim's radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH) has been the traditional surgical approach for operable Stage IB cervical cancer in Singapore whereas total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) was introduced only in 2009. In this study, we aimed to compare the long-term surgical outcome between the two routes of surgery in our center. METHODS: This is a prospective study performed in a single large tertiary institution in Singapore. Inclusion criteria included surgically fit patients with early cervical cancer and no radiological evidence of regional or distant metastases. RESULTS: From November 2009 to December 2014, 51 TLRHs and 85 RAHs were performed. Median blood loss in the TLRH group was significantly lower than in the RAH group (300 vs. 500 mL; P = 0.002) as was median hospital stay (5 vs. 6 days; P = 0.001). Operative time was significantly higher in the TLRH group (262 vs. 228 min; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in bladder recovery. Intraoperative complications were encountered in 2 (3.9%) TLRH patients and 1 (1.2%) RAH patient. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 (5.9%) TLRH patients and 8 (9.4%) RAH patients. With a median follow-up of 117 (range 1.6–314.6) weeks in the TLRH group and 143.3 (range 0.4–304.7) weeks in the RAH group, 9 (17.6%) TLRH patients and 7 (8.2%) RAH patients had recurrence. There was no significant difference in the overall 3-year survival between the TLRH group and the RAH group for tumor size ≤2 cm (100.0% vs. 97.0%; P = 0.37). However, there was a trend toward lower survival for the TLRH group for tumor size >2 cm (61.9% vs. 85.4%; P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that with appropriate patient selection, TLRH can be a safe and effective procedure for the management of early cervical cancer in Singapore, especially in women with small tumors ≤2 cm but should be used with caution in women with larger tumors. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 2019-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6515754/ /pubmed/31143623 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_43_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lim, Timothy Yong Kuei Lin, Krystal Koh Miao Wong, Wai Loong Aggarwal, Ieera Madan Yam, Philip Kwai Lam Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore |
title | Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore |
title_full | Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore |
title_fullStr | Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore |
title_short | Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore |
title_sort | surgical and oncological outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in singapore |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6515754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31143623 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_43_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limtimothyyongkuei surgicalandoncologicaloutcomeoftotallaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyversusradicalabdominalhysterectomyinearlycervicalcancerinsingapore AT linkrystalkohmiao surgicalandoncologicaloutcomeoftotallaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyversusradicalabdominalhysterectomyinearlycervicalcancerinsingapore AT wongwailoong surgicalandoncologicaloutcomeoftotallaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyversusradicalabdominalhysterectomyinearlycervicalcancerinsingapore AT aggarwalieeramadan surgicalandoncologicaloutcomeoftotallaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyversusradicalabdominalhysterectomyinearlycervicalcancerinsingapore AT yamphilipkwailam surgicalandoncologicaloutcomeoftotallaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyversusradicalabdominalhysterectomyinearlycervicalcancerinsingapore |