Cargando…

Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore

INTRODUCTION: The Wertheim's radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH) has been the traditional surgical approach for operable Stage IB cervical cancer in Singapore whereas total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) was introduced only in 2009. In this study, we aimed to compare the long-term su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Timothy Yong Kuei, Lin, Krystal Koh Miao, Wong, Wai Loong, Aggarwal, Ieera Madan, Yam, Philip Kwai Lam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6515754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31143623
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_43_18
_version_ 1783418147784622080
author Lim, Timothy Yong Kuei
Lin, Krystal Koh Miao
Wong, Wai Loong
Aggarwal, Ieera Madan
Yam, Philip Kwai Lam
author_facet Lim, Timothy Yong Kuei
Lin, Krystal Koh Miao
Wong, Wai Loong
Aggarwal, Ieera Madan
Yam, Philip Kwai Lam
author_sort Lim, Timothy Yong Kuei
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Wertheim's radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH) has been the traditional surgical approach for operable Stage IB cervical cancer in Singapore whereas total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) was introduced only in 2009. In this study, we aimed to compare the long-term surgical outcome between the two routes of surgery in our center. METHODS: This is a prospective study performed in a single large tertiary institution in Singapore. Inclusion criteria included surgically fit patients with early cervical cancer and no radiological evidence of regional or distant metastases. RESULTS: From November 2009 to December 2014, 51 TLRHs and 85 RAHs were performed. Median blood loss in the TLRH group was significantly lower than in the RAH group (300 vs. 500 mL; P = 0.002) as was median hospital stay (5 vs. 6 days; P = 0.001). Operative time was significantly higher in the TLRH group (262 vs. 228 min; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in bladder recovery. Intraoperative complications were encountered in 2 (3.9%) TLRH patients and 1 (1.2%) RAH patient. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 (5.9%) TLRH patients and 8 (9.4%) RAH patients. With a median follow-up of 117 (range 1.6–314.6) weeks in the TLRH group and 143.3 (range 0.4–304.7) weeks in the RAH group, 9 (17.6%) TLRH patients and 7 (8.2%) RAH patients had recurrence. There was no significant difference in the overall 3-year survival between the TLRH group and the RAH group for tumor size ≤2 cm (100.0% vs. 97.0%; P = 0.37). However, there was a trend toward lower survival for the TLRH group for tumor size >2 cm (61.9% vs. 85.4%; P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that with appropriate patient selection, TLRH can be a safe and effective procedure for the management of early cervical cancer in Singapore, especially in women with small tumors ≤2 cm but should be used with caution in women with larger tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6515754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65157542019-05-29 Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore Lim, Timothy Yong Kuei Lin, Krystal Koh Miao Wong, Wai Loong Aggarwal, Ieera Madan Yam, Philip Kwai Lam Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther Original Article INTRODUCTION: The Wertheim's radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH) has been the traditional surgical approach for operable Stage IB cervical cancer in Singapore whereas total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) was introduced only in 2009. In this study, we aimed to compare the long-term surgical outcome between the two routes of surgery in our center. METHODS: This is a prospective study performed in a single large tertiary institution in Singapore. Inclusion criteria included surgically fit patients with early cervical cancer and no radiological evidence of regional or distant metastases. RESULTS: From November 2009 to December 2014, 51 TLRHs and 85 RAHs were performed. Median blood loss in the TLRH group was significantly lower than in the RAH group (300 vs. 500 mL; P = 0.002) as was median hospital stay (5 vs. 6 days; P = 0.001). Operative time was significantly higher in the TLRH group (262 vs. 228 min; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in bladder recovery. Intraoperative complications were encountered in 2 (3.9%) TLRH patients and 1 (1.2%) RAH patient. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 (5.9%) TLRH patients and 8 (9.4%) RAH patients. With a median follow-up of 117 (range 1.6–314.6) weeks in the TLRH group and 143.3 (range 0.4–304.7) weeks in the RAH group, 9 (17.6%) TLRH patients and 7 (8.2%) RAH patients had recurrence. There was no significant difference in the overall 3-year survival between the TLRH group and the RAH group for tumor size ≤2 cm (100.0% vs. 97.0%; P = 0.37). However, there was a trend toward lower survival for the TLRH group for tumor size >2 cm (61.9% vs. 85.4%; P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that with appropriate patient selection, TLRH can be a safe and effective procedure for the management of early cervical cancer in Singapore, especially in women with small tumors ≤2 cm but should be used with caution in women with larger tumors. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 2019-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6515754/ /pubmed/31143623 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_43_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lim, Timothy Yong Kuei
Lin, Krystal Koh Miao
Wong, Wai Loong
Aggarwal, Ieera Madan
Yam, Philip Kwai Lam
Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore
title Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore
title_full Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore
title_fullStr Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore
title_full_unstemmed Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore
title_short Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore
title_sort surgical and oncological outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in singapore
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6515754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31143623
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_43_18
work_keys_str_mv AT limtimothyyongkuei surgicalandoncologicaloutcomeoftotallaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyversusradicalabdominalhysterectomyinearlycervicalcancerinsingapore
AT linkrystalkohmiao surgicalandoncologicaloutcomeoftotallaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyversusradicalabdominalhysterectomyinearlycervicalcancerinsingapore
AT wongwailoong surgicalandoncologicaloutcomeoftotallaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyversusradicalabdominalhysterectomyinearlycervicalcancerinsingapore
AT aggarwalieeramadan surgicalandoncologicaloutcomeoftotallaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyversusradicalabdominalhysterectomyinearlycervicalcancerinsingapore
AT yamphilipkwailam surgicalandoncologicaloutcomeoftotallaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyversusradicalabdominalhysterectomyinearlycervicalcancerinsingapore