Cargando…

Management of myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of response to hypomethylating agents

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are the standard of care for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, only around 50% of patients respond to these agents, and responses tend to be transient, with loss of response frequently happening within 2 years and being associated with very poor pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gil-Perez, Angela, Montalban-Bravo, Guillermo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6515843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620719847059
_version_ 1783418161302863872
author Gil-Perez, Angela
Montalban-Bravo, Guillermo
author_facet Gil-Perez, Angela
Montalban-Bravo, Guillermo
author_sort Gil-Perez, Angela
collection PubMed
description Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are the standard of care for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, only around 50% of patients respond to these agents, and responses tend to be transient, with loss of response frequently happening within 2 years and being associated with very poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Identification of patients who will respond to HMAs is challenging. Mechanisms underlying resistance to HMAs are not clear yet. Recently, absence of response has been associated with increased cell-cycle quiescence among the hematopoietic progenitor cells. There are no standard-of-care options for patients after HMA failure. However, the increasing knowledge of MDS pathogenesis has led to the development of new potential therapies, including HMAs with longer half-life and exposure, inhibition of the antiapoptotic BCL2 protein with venetoclax or inhibition of immune-checkpoint regulatory proteins such as PD-1 or CTLA-4, innate immunity and targeting of CD33/CD3 with multiple monoclonal antibodies. In addition, multiple targeted agents are opening opportunities to treat subgroups of patients whose disease harbors mutations in TP53, IDH, FLT3, and genes involved in splicing machinery. Newer formulations of intensive chemotherapy and its different combinations may be considered a valid option in selected patients after HMA failure. Finally, decision making at the time of failure of response to HMAs should be personalized, taking into account that allogenic stem-cell transplantation remains the only therapeutic approach with curative potential in these patients. In the current review, we will focus on all the above aspects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6515843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65158432019-05-31 Management of myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of response to hypomethylating agents Gil-Perez, Angela Montalban-Bravo, Guillermo Ther Adv Hematol Review Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are the standard of care for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, only around 50% of patients respond to these agents, and responses tend to be transient, with loss of response frequently happening within 2 years and being associated with very poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Identification of patients who will respond to HMAs is challenging. Mechanisms underlying resistance to HMAs are not clear yet. Recently, absence of response has been associated with increased cell-cycle quiescence among the hematopoietic progenitor cells. There are no standard-of-care options for patients after HMA failure. However, the increasing knowledge of MDS pathogenesis has led to the development of new potential therapies, including HMAs with longer half-life and exposure, inhibition of the antiapoptotic BCL2 protein with venetoclax or inhibition of immune-checkpoint regulatory proteins such as PD-1 or CTLA-4, innate immunity and targeting of CD33/CD3 with multiple monoclonal antibodies. In addition, multiple targeted agents are opening opportunities to treat subgroups of patients whose disease harbors mutations in TP53, IDH, FLT3, and genes involved in splicing machinery. Newer formulations of intensive chemotherapy and its different combinations may be considered a valid option in selected patients after HMA failure. Finally, decision making at the time of failure of response to HMAs should be personalized, taking into account that allogenic stem-cell transplantation remains the only therapeutic approach with curative potential in these patients. In the current review, we will focus on all the above aspects. SAGE Publications 2019-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6515843/ /pubmed/31156799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620719847059 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Gil-Perez, Angela
Montalban-Bravo, Guillermo
Management of myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of response to hypomethylating agents
title Management of myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of response to hypomethylating agents
title_full Management of myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of response to hypomethylating agents
title_fullStr Management of myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of response to hypomethylating agents
title_full_unstemmed Management of myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of response to hypomethylating agents
title_short Management of myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of response to hypomethylating agents
title_sort management of myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of response to hypomethylating agents
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6515843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31156799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620719847059
work_keys_str_mv AT gilperezangela managementofmyelodysplasticsyndromesafterfailureofresponsetohypomethylatingagents
AT montalbanbravoguillermo managementofmyelodysplasticsyndromesafterfailureofresponsetohypomethylatingagents