Cargando…

Flip-Flopping Retinal in Microbial Rhodopsins as a Template for a Farnesyl/Prenyl Flip-Flop Model in Eukaryote GPCRs

Thirty years after the first description and modeling of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), information about their mode of action is still limited. One of the questions that is hard to answer is: how do the allosteric changes in the GPCR induced by, e.g., ligand binding in the end activate a G pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Loof, Arnold, Schoofs, Liliane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6515946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31133794
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00465
_version_ 1783418172558278656
author De Loof, Arnold
Schoofs, Liliane
author_facet De Loof, Arnold
Schoofs, Liliane
author_sort De Loof, Arnold
collection PubMed
description Thirty years after the first description and modeling of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), information about their mode of action is still limited. One of the questions that is hard to answer is: how do the allosteric changes in the GPCR induced by, e.g., ligand binding in the end activate a G protein-dependent intracellular pathway (e.g., via the cAMP or the phosphatidylinositol signal pathways). Another question relates to the role of prenylation of G proteins. Today’s “consensus model” states that protein prenylation is required for the assembly of GPCR-G protein complexes. Although it is well-known that protein prenylation is the covalent addition of a farnesyl- or geranylgeranyl moiety to the C terminus of specific proteins, e.g., α or γ G protein, the reason for this strong covalent binding remains enigmatic. The arguments for a fundamental role for prenylation of G proteins other than just being a hydrophobic linker, are gradually accumulating. We uncovered a dilemma that at first glance may be considered physiologically irrelevant, however, it may cause a true change in paradigm. The consensus model suggests that the only functional role of prenylation is to link the G protein to the receptor. Does the isoprenoid nature of the prenyl group and its exact site of attachment somehow matter? Or, are there valid arguments favoring the alternative possibility that a key role of the G protein is to guide the covalently attached prenyl group to – and it hold it in – a very specific location in between specific helices of the receptor? Our model says that the farnesyl/prenyl group – aided by its covalent attachment to a G protein -might function in GPCRs as a horseshoe-shaped flexible (and perhaps flip-flopping) hydrophobic valve for restricting (though not fully inhibiting) the untimely passage of Ca(2+), like retinal does for the passage of H(+) in microbial rhodopsins that are ancestral to many GPCRs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6515946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65159462019-05-27 Flip-Flopping Retinal in Microbial Rhodopsins as a Template for a Farnesyl/Prenyl Flip-Flop Model in Eukaryote GPCRs De Loof, Arnold Schoofs, Liliane Front Neurosci Neuroscience Thirty years after the first description and modeling of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), information about their mode of action is still limited. One of the questions that is hard to answer is: how do the allosteric changes in the GPCR induced by, e.g., ligand binding in the end activate a G protein-dependent intracellular pathway (e.g., via the cAMP or the phosphatidylinositol signal pathways). Another question relates to the role of prenylation of G proteins. Today’s “consensus model” states that protein prenylation is required for the assembly of GPCR-G protein complexes. Although it is well-known that protein prenylation is the covalent addition of a farnesyl- or geranylgeranyl moiety to the C terminus of specific proteins, e.g., α or γ G protein, the reason for this strong covalent binding remains enigmatic. The arguments for a fundamental role for prenylation of G proteins other than just being a hydrophobic linker, are gradually accumulating. We uncovered a dilemma that at first glance may be considered physiologically irrelevant, however, it may cause a true change in paradigm. The consensus model suggests that the only functional role of prenylation is to link the G protein to the receptor. Does the isoprenoid nature of the prenyl group and its exact site of attachment somehow matter? Or, are there valid arguments favoring the alternative possibility that a key role of the G protein is to guide the covalently attached prenyl group to – and it hold it in – a very specific location in between specific helices of the receptor? Our model says that the farnesyl/prenyl group – aided by its covalent attachment to a G protein -might function in GPCRs as a horseshoe-shaped flexible (and perhaps flip-flopping) hydrophobic valve for restricting (though not fully inhibiting) the untimely passage of Ca(2+), like retinal does for the passage of H(+) in microbial rhodopsins that are ancestral to many GPCRs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6515946/ /pubmed/31133794 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00465 Text en Copyright © 2019 De Loof and Schoofs. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
De Loof, Arnold
Schoofs, Liliane
Flip-Flopping Retinal in Microbial Rhodopsins as a Template for a Farnesyl/Prenyl Flip-Flop Model in Eukaryote GPCRs
title Flip-Flopping Retinal in Microbial Rhodopsins as a Template for a Farnesyl/Prenyl Flip-Flop Model in Eukaryote GPCRs
title_full Flip-Flopping Retinal in Microbial Rhodopsins as a Template for a Farnesyl/Prenyl Flip-Flop Model in Eukaryote GPCRs
title_fullStr Flip-Flopping Retinal in Microbial Rhodopsins as a Template for a Farnesyl/Prenyl Flip-Flop Model in Eukaryote GPCRs
title_full_unstemmed Flip-Flopping Retinal in Microbial Rhodopsins as a Template for a Farnesyl/Prenyl Flip-Flop Model in Eukaryote GPCRs
title_short Flip-Flopping Retinal in Microbial Rhodopsins as a Template for a Farnesyl/Prenyl Flip-Flop Model in Eukaryote GPCRs
title_sort flip-flopping retinal in microbial rhodopsins as a template for a farnesyl/prenyl flip-flop model in eukaryote gpcrs
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6515946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31133794
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00465
work_keys_str_mv AT deloofarnold flipfloppingretinalinmicrobialrhodopsinsasatemplateforafarnesylprenylflipflopmodelineukaryotegpcrs
AT schoofsliliane flipfloppingretinalinmicrobialrhodopsinsasatemplateforafarnesylprenylflipflopmodelineukaryotegpcrs