Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of two techniques of temporary ovarian suspension to the anterior abdominal wall after operative laparoscopy
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study compares the safety and efficacy of temporary ovarian suspension (TOS) to the anterior abdominal wall using absorbable versus non-absorbable suture after operative laparoscopy to elevate the ovaries away from the ovarian fossa to reduce postoperative adhesion dev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Universa Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6516191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31110645 |
_version_ | 1783418210551332864 |
---|---|
author | Abuzeid, Omar M Hebert, John Ashraf, Mohammad Mitwally, Mohamed Diamond, Michael P Abuzeid, Mostafa I |
author_facet | Abuzeid, Omar M Hebert, John Ashraf, Mohammad Mitwally, Mohamed Diamond, Michael P Abuzeid, Mostafa I |
author_sort | Abuzeid, Omar M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This retrospective study compares the safety and efficacy of temporary ovarian suspension (TOS) to the anterior abdominal wall using absorbable versus non-absorbable suture after operative laparoscopy to elevate the ovaries away from the ovarian fossa to reduce postoperative adhesion development. METHODS: Patients (n=152) underwent TOS to the anterior abdominal wall at the conclusion of surgery between 1998 and 2017. One hundred forty-two patients underwent operative laparoscopy for advanced stages of endometriosis (93.4%) and 10 patients for other indications (6.6%). In 78 patients the ovaries were suspended to the fascia using absorbable 3-0 plain catgut sutures (Group 1). In 74 earlier patients non-absorbable 3-0 mono-lamentous nylon was used to suspend the ovaries to the anterior abdominal (Group 2). RESULTS: In both groups there was no reported incidence of any major intra-operative complications such as bleeding, or late complications such as infection, hematoma or bowel herniation through the suture loop and its sequalae (bowel obstruction or strangulation). In all patients in both groups the ovaries were present in its anatomical location on transvaginal ultrasound scan, one week after surgery following absorption or removal of the TOS suture. There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy (34.3% vs 44.2%) and delivery (31.3% vs 36.5%) rates in patients who conceived with non-IVF methods between Group 1 and Group 2 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TOS to the anterior abdominal wall, using absorbable or non-absorbable sutures, in an attempt to reduce postoperative adhesion development between the ovary and ovarian fossa, is simple, safe, easy to learn, and has potential effectiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6516191 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Universa Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65161912019-05-20 Safety and efficacy of two techniques of temporary ovarian suspension to the anterior abdominal wall after operative laparoscopy Abuzeid, Omar M Hebert, John Ashraf, Mohammad Mitwally, Mohamed Diamond, Michael P Abuzeid, Mostafa I Facts Views Vis Obgyn Original Paper BACKGROUND: This retrospective study compares the safety and efficacy of temporary ovarian suspension (TOS) to the anterior abdominal wall using absorbable versus non-absorbable suture after operative laparoscopy to elevate the ovaries away from the ovarian fossa to reduce postoperative adhesion development. METHODS: Patients (n=152) underwent TOS to the anterior abdominal wall at the conclusion of surgery between 1998 and 2017. One hundred forty-two patients underwent operative laparoscopy for advanced stages of endometriosis (93.4%) and 10 patients for other indications (6.6%). In 78 patients the ovaries were suspended to the fascia using absorbable 3-0 plain catgut sutures (Group 1). In 74 earlier patients non-absorbable 3-0 mono-lamentous nylon was used to suspend the ovaries to the anterior abdominal (Group 2). RESULTS: In both groups there was no reported incidence of any major intra-operative complications such as bleeding, or late complications such as infection, hematoma or bowel herniation through the suture loop and its sequalae (bowel obstruction or strangulation). In all patients in both groups the ovaries were present in its anatomical location on transvaginal ultrasound scan, one week after surgery following absorption or removal of the TOS suture. There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy (34.3% vs 44.2%) and delivery (31.3% vs 36.5%) rates in patients who conceived with non-IVF methods between Group 1 and Group 2 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TOS to the anterior abdominal wall, using absorbable or non-absorbable sutures, in an attempt to reduce postoperative adhesion development between the ovary and ovarian fossa, is simple, safe, easy to learn, and has potential effectiveness. Universa Press 2018-06 2019-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6516191/ /pubmed/31110645 Text en Copyright © 2018 Facts, Views & Vision http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Abuzeid, Omar M Hebert, John Ashraf, Mohammad Mitwally, Mohamed Diamond, Michael P Abuzeid, Mostafa I Safety and efficacy of two techniques of temporary ovarian suspension to the anterior abdominal wall after operative laparoscopy |
title | Safety and efficacy of two techniques of temporary ovarian suspension to the anterior abdominal wall after operative laparoscopy |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of two techniques of temporary ovarian suspension to the anterior abdominal wall after operative laparoscopy |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of two techniques of temporary ovarian suspension to the anterior abdominal wall after operative laparoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of two techniques of temporary ovarian suspension to the anterior abdominal wall after operative laparoscopy |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of two techniques of temporary ovarian suspension to the anterior abdominal wall after operative laparoscopy |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of two techniques of temporary ovarian suspension to the anterior abdominal wall after operative laparoscopy |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6516191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31110645 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abuzeidomarm safetyandefficacyoftwotechniquesoftemporaryovariansuspensiontotheanteriorabdominalwallafteroperativelaparoscopy AT hebertjohn safetyandefficacyoftwotechniquesoftemporaryovariansuspensiontotheanteriorabdominalwallafteroperativelaparoscopy AT ashrafmohammad safetyandefficacyoftwotechniquesoftemporaryovariansuspensiontotheanteriorabdominalwallafteroperativelaparoscopy AT mitwallymohamed safetyandefficacyoftwotechniquesoftemporaryovariansuspensiontotheanteriorabdominalwallafteroperativelaparoscopy AT diamondmichaelp safetyandefficacyoftwotechniquesoftemporaryovariansuspensiontotheanteriorabdominalwallafteroperativelaparoscopy AT abuzeidmostafai safetyandefficacyoftwotechniquesoftemporaryovariansuspensiontotheanteriorabdominalwallafteroperativelaparoscopy |