Cargando…

‘We’re passengers sailing in the same ship, but we have our own berths to sleep in’: Evaluating patient and public involvement within a regional research programme: An action research project informed by Normalisation Process Theory

BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is a requirement for UK health and social care research funding. Evidence for how best to implement PPI in research programmes, such as National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaborations for Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs), remain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keenan, Julia, Poland, Fiona, Boote, Jonathan, Howe, Amanda, Wythe, Helena, Varley, Anna, Vicary, Penny, Irvine, Lisa, Wellings, Amander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6516650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31086394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215953
_version_ 1783418224140877824
author Keenan, Julia
Poland, Fiona
Boote, Jonathan
Howe, Amanda
Wythe, Helena
Varley, Anna
Vicary, Penny
Irvine, Lisa
Wellings, Amander
author_facet Keenan, Julia
Poland, Fiona
Boote, Jonathan
Howe, Amanda
Wythe, Helena
Varley, Anna
Vicary, Penny
Irvine, Lisa
Wellings, Amander
author_sort Keenan, Julia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is a requirement for UK health and social care research funding. Evidence for how best to implement PPI in research programmes, such as National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaborations for Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs), remains limited. This paper reports findings from an action research (AR) project called IMPRESS, which aims to strengthen PPI within CLAHRC East of England (EoE). IMPRESS combines AR with Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) to explore PPI within diverse case study projects, identifying actions to implement, test and refine to further embed PPI. METHODS: We purposively selected CLAHRC EoE case study projects for in-depth analysis of PPI using NPT. Data were generated from project PPI documentation, semi-structured qualitative interviews with researchers and PPI contributors and focus groups. Transcripts and documents were subjected to abductive thematic analysis and triangulation within case. Systematic across case comparison of themes was undertaken with findings and implications refined through stakeholder consultation. RESULTS: We interviewed 24 researchers and 13 PPI contributors and analysed 28 documents from 10 case studies. Three focus groups were held: two with researchers (n = 4 and n = 6) and one with PPI contributors (n = 5). Findings detail to what extent projects made sense of PPI, bought in to PPI, operationalised PPI and appraised it, thus identifying barriers and enablers to fully embedded PPI. CONCLUSION: Combining NPT with AR allows us to assess the embeddedness of PPI within projects and programme, to inform specific local action and report broader conceptual lessons for PPI knowledge and practice informing the development of an action framework for embedding PPI in research programmes. To embed PPI within similar programmes teams, professionals, disciplines and institutions should be recognised as variably networked into existing PPI support. Further focus and research is needed on sharing PPI learning and supporting innovation in PPI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6516650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65166502019-05-31 ‘We’re passengers sailing in the same ship, but we have our own berths to sleep in’: Evaluating patient and public involvement within a regional research programme: An action research project informed by Normalisation Process Theory Keenan, Julia Poland, Fiona Boote, Jonathan Howe, Amanda Wythe, Helena Varley, Anna Vicary, Penny Irvine, Lisa Wellings, Amander PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is a requirement for UK health and social care research funding. Evidence for how best to implement PPI in research programmes, such as National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaborations for Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs), remains limited. This paper reports findings from an action research (AR) project called IMPRESS, which aims to strengthen PPI within CLAHRC East of England (EoE). IMPRESS combines AR with Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) to explore PPI within diverse case study projects, identifying actions to implement, test and refine to further embed PPI. METHODS: We purposively selected CLAHRC EoE case study projects for in-depth analysis of PPI using NPT. Data were generated from project PPI documentation, semi-structured qualitative interviews with researchers and PPI contributors and focus groups. Transcripts and documents were subjected to abductive thematic analysis and triangulation within case. Systematic across case comparison of themes was undertaken with findings and implications refined through stakeholder consultation. RESULTS: We interviewed 24 researchers and 13 PPI contributors and analysed 28 documents from 10 case studies. Three focus groups were held: two with researchers (n = 4 and n = 6) and one with PPI contributors (n = 5). Findings detail to what extent projects made sense of PPI, bought in to PPI, operationalised PPI and appraised it, thus identifying barriers and enablers to fully embedded PPI. CONCLUSION: Combining NPT with AR allows us to assess the embeddedness of PPI within projects and programme, to inform specific local action and report broader conceptual lessons for PPI knowledge and practice informing the development of an action framework for embedding PPI in research programmes. To embed PPI within similar programmes teams, professionals, disciplines and institutions should be recognised as variably networked into existing PPI support. Further focus and research is needed on sharing PPI learning and supporting innovation in PPI. Public Library of Science 2019-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6516650/ /pubmed/31086394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215953 Text en © 2019 Keenan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Keenan, Julia
Poland, Fiona
Boote, Jonathan
Howe, Amanda
Wythe, Helena
Varley, Anna
Vicary, Penny
Irvine, Lisa
Wellings, Amander
‘We’re passengers sailing in the same ship, but we have our own berths to sleep in’: Evaluating patient and public involvement within a regional research programme: An action research project informed by Normalisation Process Theory
title ‘We’re passengers sailing in the same ship, but we have our own berths to sleep in’: Evaluating patient and public involvement within a regional research programme: An action research project informed by Normalisation Process Theory
title_full ‘We’re passengers sailing in the same ship, but we have our own berths to sleep in’: Evaluating patient and public involvement within a regional research programme: An action research project informed by Normalisation Process Theory
title_fullStr ‘We’re passengers sailing in the same ship, but we have our own berths to sleep in’: Evaluating patient and public involvement within a regional research programme: An action research project informed by Normalisation Process Theory
title_full_unstemmed ‘We’re passengers sailing in the same ship, but we have our own berths to sleep in’: Evaluating patient and public involvement within a regional research programme: An action research project informed by Normalisation Process Theory
title_short ‘We’re passengers sailing in the same ship, but we have our own berths to sleep in’: Evaluating patient and public involvement within a regional research programme: An action research project informed by Normalisation Process Theory
title_sort ‘we’re passengers sailing in the same ship, but we have our own berths to sleep in’: evaluating patient and public involvement within a regional research programme: an action research project informed by normalisation process theory
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6516650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31086394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215953
work_keys_str_mv AT keenanjulia werepassengerssailinginthesameshipbutwehaveourownberthstosleepinevaluatingpatientandpublicinvolvementwithinaregionalresearchprogrammeanactionresearchprojectinformedbynormalisationprocesstheory
AT polandfiona werepassengerssailinginthesameshipbutwehaveourownberthstosleepinevaluatingpatientandpublicinvolvementwithinaregionalresearchprogrammeanactionresearchprojectinformedbynormalisationprocesstheory
AT bootejonathan werepassengerssailinginthesameshipbutwehaveourownberthstosleepinevaluatingpatientandpublicinvolvementwithinaregionalresearchprogrammeanactionresearchprojectinformedbynormalisationprocesstheory
AT howeamanda werepassengerssailinginthesameshipbutwehaveourownberthstosleepinevaluatingpatientandpublicinvolvementwithinaregionalresearchprogrammeanactionresearchprojectinformedbynormalisationprocesstheory
AT wythehelena werepassengerssailinginthesameshipbutwehaveourownberthstosleepinevaluatingpatientandpublicinvolvementwithinaregionalresearchprogrammeanactionresearchprojectinformedbynormalisationprocesstheory
AT varleyanna werepassengerssailinginthesameshipbutwehaveourownberthstosleepinevaluatingpatientandpublicinvolvementwithinaregionalresearchprogrammeanactionresearchprojectinformedbynormalisationprocesstheory
AT vicarypenny werepassengerssailinginthesameshipbutwehaveourownberthstosleepinevaluatingpatientandpublicinvolvementwithinaregionalresearchprogrammeanactionresearchprojectinformedbynormalisationprocesstheory
AT irvinelisa werepassengerssailinginthesameshipbutwehaveourownberthstosleepinevaluatingpatientandpublicinvolvementwithinaregionalresearchprogrammeanactionresearchprojectinformedbynormalisationprocesstheory
AT wellingsamander werepassengerssailinginthesameshipbutwehaveourownberthstosleepinevaluatingpatientandpublicinvolvementwithinaregionalresearchprogrammeanactionresearchprojectinformedbynormalisationprocesstheory