Cargando…

Defining molecular risk in ALK(+) NSCLC

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) have the best prognosis among metastatic pulmonary malignancies, with a median patient survival currently exceeding 5 years. While this is definitely a major therapeutic success for thoracic oncology, it may not be entirel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christopoulos, Petros, Budczies, Jan, Kirchner, Martina, Dietz, Steffen, Sültmann, Holger, Thomas, Michael, Stenzinger, Albrecht
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139322
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26886
_version_ 1783418245609422848
author Christopoulos, Petros
Budczies, Jan
Kirchner, Martina
Dietz, Steffen
Sültmann, Holger
Thomas, Michael
Stenzinger, Albrecht
author_facet Christopoulos, Petros
Budczies, Jan
Kirchner, Martina
Dietz, Steffen
Sültmann, Holger
Thomas, Michael
Stenzinger, Albrecht
author_sort Christopoulos, Petros
collection PubMed
description Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) have the best prognosis among metastatic pulmonary malignancies, with a median patient survival currently exceeding 5 years. While this is definitely a major therapeutic success for thoracic oncology, it may not be entirely attributable to rapid drug development and the strenuous clinical efforts. At the genetic level, ALK(+) disease is also unique, distinguished by the lowest tumor mutational burden (mean below 3 mutations/Mbp), the lowest frequency of TP53 mutations (20–25%) and very few other co-mutations compared to other NSCLC. The relative simplicity and stability of the genetic landscape not only contribute to the relatively favourable clinical course, but also make study of the effects from individual molecular features easier. EML4-ALK fusion variant 3 (E6;A20) and TP53 mutations were recently identified as main molecular determinants of adverse outcome: they occur in about 30–40% and 20–25% of newly-diagnosed cases, respectively, have possibly synergistic effects and are independently associated with more aggressive disease, shorter progression-free survival under treatment with ALK inhibitors and worse overall survival. Secondary detection of TP53 mutations at disease progression in previously negative patients defines another subset (about 20%) with similarly poor outcome, while detection of ALK resistance mutations guides next-line therapy. As our biological understanding deepens, additional molecular risk factors will be identified and refine our concepts further. The translation of clinical risk at the molecular level and the ability to predict early events are of key importance for individualized patient management and preclinical modeling in order to advance therapeutic options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6517105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65171052019-05-28 Defining molecular risk in ALK(+) NSCLC Christopoulos, Petros Budczies, Jan Kirchner, Martina Dietz, Steffen Sültmann, Holger Thomas, Michael Stenzinger, Albrecht Oncotarget Research Perspective Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) have the best prognosis among metastatic pulmonary malignancies, with a median patient survival currently exceeding 5 years. While this is definitely a major therapeutic success for thoracic oncology, it may not be entirely attributable to rapid drug development and the strenuous clinical efforts. At the genetic level, ALK(+) disease is also unique, distinguished by the lowest tumor mutational burden (mean below 3 mutations/Mbp), the lowest frequency of TP53 mutations (20–25%) and very few other co-mutations compared to other NSCLC. The relative simplicity and stability of the genetic landscape not only contribute to the relatively favourable clinical course, but also make study of the effects from individual molecular features easier. EML4-ALK fusion variant 3 (E6;A20) and TP53 mutations were recently identified as main molecular determinants of adverse outcome: they occur in about 30–40% and 20–25% of newly-diagnosed cases, respectively, have possibly synergistic effects and are independently associated with more aggressive disease, shorter progression-free survival under treatment with ALK inhibitors and worse overall survival. Secondary detection of TP53 mutations at disease progression in previously negative patients defines another subset (about 20%) with similarly poor outcome, while detection of ALK resistance mutations guides next-line therapy. As our biological understanding deepens, additional molecular risk factors will be identified and refine our concepts further. The translation of clinical risk at the molecular level and the ability to predict early events are of key importance for individualized patient management and preclinical modeling in order to advance therapeutic options. Impact Journals LLC 2019-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6517105/ /pubmed/31139322 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26886 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Christopoulos et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Perspective
Christopoulos, Petros
Budczies, Jan
Kirchner, Martina
Dietz, Steffen
Sültmann, Holger
Thomas, Michael
Stenzinger, Albrecht
Defining molecular risk in ALK(+) NSCLC
title Defining molecular risk in ALK(+) NSCLC
title_full Defining molecular risk in ALK(+) NSCLC
title_fullStr Defining molecular risk in ALK(+) NSCLC
title_full_unstemmed Defining molecular risk in ALK(+) NSCLC
title_short Defining molecular risk in ALK(+) NSCLC
title_sort defining molecular risk in alk(+) nsclc
topic Research Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139322
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26886
work_keys_str_mv AT christopoulospetros definingmolecularriskinalknsclc
AT budcziesjan definingmolecularriskinalknsclc
AT kirchnermartina definingmolecularriskinalknsclc
AT dietzsteffen definingmolecularriskinalknsclc
AT sultmannholger definingmolecularriskinalknsclc
AT thomasmichael definingmolecularriskinalknsclc
AT stenzingeralbrecht definingmolecularriskinalknsclc