Cargando…
Cytokine removal in human septic shock: Where are we and where are we going?
Although improving, the mortality from septic shock still remains high despite increased international awareness. As a consequence, much effort has focused on alternative treatment strategies in an effort to improve outcomes. The application of blood purification therapies to improve immune homeosta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31089920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0530-y |
_version_ | 1783418279501496320 |
---|---|
author | Honore, Patrick M. Hoste, Eric Molnár, Zsolt Jacobs, Rita Joannes-Boyau, Olivier Malbrain, Manu L. N. G. Forni, Lui G. |
author_facet | Honore, Patrick M. Hoste, Eric Molnár, Zsolt Jacobs, Rita Joannes-Boyau, Olivier Malbrain, Manu L. N. G. Forni, Lui G. |
author_sort | Honore, Patrick M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although improving, the mortality from septic shock still remains high despite increased international awareness. As a consequence, much effort has focused on alternative treatment strategies in an effort to improve outcomes. The application of blood purification therapies to improve immune homeostasis has been suggested as one such method, but these approaches, such as high-volume continuous haemofiltration or cytokine and/or endotoxin removal, have enjoyed little success to date. More recently, the use of sorbent technologies has attracted much attention. These adsorbers are highly effective at removing inflammatory mediators, in particular, cytokines, from the bloodstream. This narrative review is the executive summary of meetings held throughout the 6th International Fluid Academy Days in Antwerp, Belgium (Nov 23–25, 2017), focusing on the current understanding regarding the use of such adsorbers in humans with septic shock. We followed a modified Delphi approach involving a combination of evidence appraisal together with expert opinion in order to achieve recommendations for practice and, importantly, future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6517449 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65174492019-05-29 Cytokine removal in human septic shock: Where are we and where are we going? Honore, Patrick M. Hoste, Eric Molnár, Zsolt Jacobs, Rita Joannes-Boyau, Olivier Malbrain, Manu L. N. G. Forni, Lui G. Ann Intensive Care Review Although improving, the mortality from septic shock still remains high despite increased international awareness. As a consequence, much effort has focused on alternative treatment strategies in an effort to improve outcomes. The application of blood purification therapies to improve immune homeostasis has been suggested as one such method, but these approaches, such as high-volume continuous haemofiltration or cytokine and/or endotoxin removal, have enjoyed little success to date. More recently, the use of sorbent technologies has attracted much attention. These adsorbers are highly effective at removing inflammatory mediators, in particular, cytokines, from the bloodstream. This narrative review is the executive summary of meetings held throughout the 6th International Fluid Academy Days in Antwerp, Belgium (Nov 23–25, 2017), focusing on the current understanding regarding the use of such adsorbers in humans with septic shock. We followed a modified Delphi approach involving a combination of evidence appraisal together with expert opinion in order to achieve recommendations for practice and, importantly, future research. Springer International Publishing 2019-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6517449/ /pubmed/31089920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0530-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Honore, Patrick M. Hoste, Eric Molnár, Zsolt Jacobs, Rita Joannes-Boyau, Olivier Malbrain, Manu L. N. G. Forni, Lui G. Cytokine removal in human septic shock: Where are we and where are we going? |
title | Cytokine removal in human septic shock: Where are we and where are we going? |
title_full | Cytokine removal in human septic shock: Where are we and where are we going? |
title_fullStr | Cytokine removal in human septic shock: Where are we and where are we going? |
title_full_unstemmed | Cytokine removal in human septic shock: Where are we and where are we going? |
title_short | Cytokine removal in human septic shock: Where are we and where are we going? |
title_sort | cytokine removal in human septic shock: where are we and where are we going? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31089920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0530-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT honorepatrickm cytokineremovalinhumansepticshockwhereareweandwherearewegoing AT hosteeric cytokineremovalinhumansepticshockwhereareweandwherearewegoing AT molnarzsolt cytokineremovalinhumansepticshockwhereareweandwherearewegoing AT jacobsrita cytokineremovalinhumansepticshockwhereareweandwherearewegoing AT joannesboyauolivier cytokineremovalinhumansepticshockwhereareweandwherearewegoing AT malbrainmanulng cytokineremovalinhumansepticshockwhereareweandwherearewegoing AT forniluig cytokineremovalinhumansepticshockwhereareweandwherearewegoing |