Cargando…

Cytokine removal in human septic shock: Where are we and where are we going?

Although improving, the mortality from septic shock still remains high despite increased international awareness. As a consequence, much effort has focused on alternative treatment strategies in an effort to improve outcomes. The application of blood purification therapies to improve immune homeosta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Honore, Patrick M., Hoste, Eric, Molnár, Zsolt, Jacobs, Rita, Joannes-Boyau, Olivier, Malbrain, Manu L. N. G., Forni, Lui G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31089920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0530-y
_version_ 1783418279501496320
author Honore, Patrick M.
Hoste, Eric
Molnár, Zsolt
Jacobs, Rita
Joannes-Boyau, Olivier
Malbrain, Manu L. N. G.
Forni, Lui G.
author_facet Honore, Patrick M.
Hoste, Eric
Molnár, Zsolt
Jacobs, Rita
Joannes-Boyau, Olivier
Malbrain, Manu L. N. G.
Forni, Lui G.
author_sort Honore, Patrick M.
collection PubMed
description Although improving, the mortality from septic shock still remains high despite increased international awareness. As a consequence, much effort has focused on alternative treatment strategies in an effort to improve outcomes. The application of blood purification therapies to improve immune homeostasis has been suggested as one such method, but these approaches, such as high-volume continuous haemofiltration or cytokine and/or endotoxin removal, have enjoyed little success to date. More recently, the use of sorbent technologies has attracted much attention. These adsorbers are highly effective at removing inflammatory mediators, in particular, cytokines, from the bloodstream. This narrative review is the executive summary of meetings held throughout the 6th International Fluid Academy Days in Antwerp, Belgium (Nov 23–25, 2017), focusing on the current understanding regarding the use of such adsorbers in humans with septic shock. We followed a modified Delphi approach involving a combination of evidence appraisal together with expert opinion in order to achieve recommendations for practice and, importantly, future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6517449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65174492019-05-29 Cytokine removal in human septic shock: Where are we and where are we going? Honore, Patrick M. Hoste, Eric Molnár, Zsolt Jacobs, Rita Joannes-Boyau, Olivier Malbrain, Manu L. N. G. Forni, Lui G. Ann Intensive Care Review Although improving, the mortality from septic shock still remains high despite increased international awareness. As a consequence, much effort has focused on alternative treatment strategies in an effort to improve outcomes. The application of blood purification therapies to improve immune homeostasis has been suggested as one such method, but these approaches, such as high-volume continuous haemofiltration or cytokine and/or endotoxin removal, have enjoyed little success to date. More recently, the use of sorbent technologies has attracted much attention. These adsorbers are highly effective at removing inflammatory mediators, in particular, cytokines, from the bloodstream. This narrative review is the executive summary of meetings held throughout the 6th International Fluid Academy Days in Antwerp, Belgium (Nov 23–25, 2017), focusing on the current understanding regarding the use of such adsorbers in humans with septic shock. We followed a modified Delphi approach involving a combination of evidence appraisal together with expert opinion in order to achieve recommendations for practice and, importantly, future research. Springer International Publishing 2019-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6517449/ /pubmed/31089920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0530-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Honore, Patrick M.
Hoste, Eric
Molnár, Zsolt
Jacobs, Rita
Joannes-Boyau, Olivier
Malbrain, Manu L. N. G.
Forni, Lui G.
Cytokine removal in human septic shock: Where are we and where are we going?
title Cytokine removal in human septic shock: Where are we and where are we going?
title_full Cytokine removal in human septic shock: Where are we and where are we going?
title_fullStr Cytokine removal in human septic shock: Where are we and where are we going?
title_full_unstemmed Cytokine removal in human septic shock: Where are we and where are we going?
title_short Cytokine removal in human septic shock: Where are we and where are we going?
title_sort cytokine removal in human septic shock: where are we and where are we going?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31089920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0530-y
work_keys_str_mv AT honorepatrickm cytokineremovalinhumansepticshockwhereareweandwherearewegoing
AT hosteeric cytokineremovalinhumansepticshockwhereareweandwherearewegoing
AT molnarzsolt cytokineremovalinhumansepticshockwhereareweandwherearewegoing
AT jacobsrita cytokineremovalinhumansepticshockwhereareweandwherearewegoing
AT joannesboyauolivier cytokineremovalinhumansepticshockwhereareweandwherearewegoing
AT malbrainmanulng cytokineremovalinhumansepticshockwhereareweandwherearewegoing
AT forniluig cytokineremovalinhumansepticshockwhereareweandwherearewegoing