Cargando…

A comparison of coffee floral traits under two different agricultural practices

Floral traits and rewards are important in mediating interactions between plants and pollinators. Agricultural management practices can affect abiotic factors known to influence floral traits; however, our understanding of the links between agricultural practices and floral trait expression is still...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prado, Sara Guiti, Collazo, Jaime A., Stevenson, Philip C., Irwin, Rebecca E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31089179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43753-y
_version_ 1783418309364940800
author Prado, Sara Guiti
Collazo, Jaime A.
Stevenson, Philip C.
Irwin, Rebecca E.
author_facet Prado, Sara Guiti
Collazo, Jaime A.
Stevenson, Philip C.
Irwin, Rebecca E.
author_sort Prado, Sara Guiti
collection PubMed
description Floral traits and rewards are important in mediating interactions between plants and pollinators. Agricultural management practices can affect abiotic factors known to influence floral traits; however, our understanding of the links between agricultural practices and floral trait expression is still poorly understood. Variation in floral morphological, nectar, and pollen traits of two important agricultural species, Coffea arabica and C. canephora, was assessed under different agricultural practices (sun and shade). Corolla diameter and corolla tube length were larger and pollen total nitrogen content greater in shade plantations of C. canephora than sun plantations. Corolla tube length and anther filament length were larger in shade plantations of C. arabica. No effect of agricultural practice was found on nectar volume, sugar or caffeine concentrations, or pollen production. Pollen total nitrogen content was lower in sun than shade plantations of C. canephora, but no difference was found between sun and shade for C. arabica. This study provides baseline data on the influence of agronomic practices on C. arabica and C. canephora floral traits and also helps fill a gap in knowledge about the effects of shade trees on floral traits, which can be pertinent to other agroforestry systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6517588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65175882019-05-24 A comparison of coffee floral traits under two different agricultural practices Prado, Sara Guiti Collazo, Jaime A. Stevenson, Philip C. Irwin, Rebecca E. Sci Rep Article Floral traits and rewards are important in mediating interactions between plants and pollinators. Agricultural management practices can affect abiotic factors known to influence floral traits; however, our understanding of the links between agricultural practices and floral trait expression is still poorly understood. Variation in floral morphological, nectar, and pollen traits of two important agricultural species, Coffea arabica and C. canephora, was assessed under different agricultural practices (sun and shade). Corolla diameter and corolla tube length were larger and pollen total nitrogen content greater in shade plantations of C. canephora than sun plantations. Corolla tube length and anther filament length were larger in shade plantations of C. arabica. No effect of agricultural practice was found on nectar volume, sugar or caffeine concentrations, or pollen production. Pollen total nitrogen content was lower in sun than shade plantations of C. canephora, but no difference was found between sun and shade for C. arabica. This study provides baseline data on the influence of agronomic practices on C. arabica and C. canephora floral traits and also helps fill a gap in knowledge about the effects of shade trees on floral traits, which can be pertinent to other agroforestry systems. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6517588/ /pubmed/31089179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43753-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Prado, Sara Guiti
Collazo, Jaime A.
Stevenson, Philip C.
Irwin, Rebecca E.
A comparison of coffee floral traits under two different agricultural practices
title A comparison of coffee floral traits under two different agricultural practices
title_full A comparison of coffee floral traits under two different agricultural practices
title_fullStr A comparison of coffee floral traits under two different agricultural practices
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of coffee floral traits under two different agricultural practices
title_short A comparison of coffee floral traits under two different agricultural practices
title_sort comparison of coffee floral traits under two different agricultural practices
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31089179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43753-y
work_keys_str_mv AT pradosaraguiti acomparisonofcoffeefloraltraitsundertwodifferentagriculturalpractices
AT collazojaimea acomparisonofcoffeefloraltraitsundertwodifferentagriculturalpractices
AT stevensonphilipc acomparisonofcoffeefloraltraitsundertwodifferentagriculturalpractices
AT irwinrebeccae acomparisonofcoffeefloraltraitsundertwodifferentagriculturalpractices
AT pradosaraguiti comparisonofcoffeefloraltraitsundertwodifferentagriculturalpractices
AT collazojaimea comparisonofcoffeefloraltraitsundertwodifferentagriculturalpractices
AT stevensonphilipc comparisonofcoffeefloraltraitsundertwodifferentagriculturalpractices
AT irwinrebeccae comparisonofcoffeefloraltraitsundertwodifferentagriculturalpractices