Cargando…

Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Background: The choice of empirical antibiotic treatment for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who are admitted to non-intensive care unit (ICU) hospital wards is complicated by the limited availability of evidence. We systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of strategies of e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Sitong, Tong, Xiang, Ma, Yao, Wang, Dongguang, Huang, Jizhen, Zhang, Li, Wu, Man, Wang, Lei, Liu, Tao, Fan, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139081
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00489
_version_ 1783418326163128320
author Liu, Sitong
Tong, Xiang
Ma, Yao
Wang, Dongguang
Huang, Jizhen
Zhang, Li
Wu, Man
Wang, Lei
Liu, Tao
Fan, Hong
author_facet Liu, Sitong
Tong, Xiang
Ma, Yao
Wang, Dongguang
Huang, Jizhen
Zhang, Li
Wu, Man
Wang, Lei
Liu, Tao
Fan, Hong
author_sort Liu, Sitong
collection PubMed
description Background: The choice of empirical antibiotic treatment for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who are admitted to non-intensive care unit (ICU) hospital wards is complicated by the limited availability of evidence. We systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of strategies of empirical treatment with respiratory fluoroquinolone monotherapy and β-lactam with or without macrolide for non-ICU hospitalized CAP patients. Methods: We searched databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library (Issue11, 2018), EMbase, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), WanFang Data, VIP, and China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the comparison of respiratory fluoroquinolone monotherapy and β-lactam with or without macrolide for the non-ICU hospitalized patients with CAP up to November 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. A meta-analysis was performed with the outcomes. Results: A total of 22 studies involving 6,235 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed a non-significant trend toward an advantage to the respiratory fluoroquinolone in overall mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65–1.02). No significant difference was found between the two strategies in clinical success (the intention-to-treat population: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99–1.08; the clinically evaluable population: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.999–1.055; the population in which it was unclear whether intention-to-treat or per-protocol analysis was used: RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.99–1.09), microbiological treatment success (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.997–1.092), and length of stay (SMD −0.06, 95% CI −0.16 to 0.04). The advantage of respiratory fluoroquinolone was statistically significant on the drug-related adverse events (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.97). Conclusions: Current evidence shows that fluoroquinolone monotherapy has similar efficacy and favorable safety compared with β-lactam with or without macrolide for non-ICU hospitalized CAP patients. Since the limitation of region, quantity and quality of included studies, more RCTs with large scale and high quality are needed to verify the above conclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6517694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65176942019-05-28 Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis Liu, Sitong Tong, Xiang Ma, Yao Wang, Dongguang Huang, Jizhen Zhang, Li Wu, Man Wang, Lei Liu, Tao Fan, Hong Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: The choice of empirical antibiotic treatment for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who are admitted to non-intensive care unit (ICU) hospital wards is complicated by the limited availability of evidence. We systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of strategies of empirical treatment with respiratory fluoroquinolone monotherapy and β-lactam with or without macrolide for non-ICU hospitalized CAP patients. Methods: We searched databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library (Issue11, 2018), EMbase, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), WanFang Data, VIP, and China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the comparison of respiratory fluoroquinolone monotherapy and β-lactam with or without macrolide for the non-ICU hospitalized patients with CAP up to November 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. A meta-analysis was performed with the outcomes. Results: A total of 22 studies involving 6,235 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed a non-significant trend toward an advantage to the respiratory fluoroquinolone in overall mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65–1.02). No significant difference was found between the two strategies in clinical success (the intention-to-treat population: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99–1.08; the clinically evaluable population: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.999–1.055; the population in which it was unclear whether intention-to-treat or per-protocol analysis was used: RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.99–1.09), microbiological treatment success (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.997–1.092), and length of stay (SMD −0.06, 95% CI −0.16 to 0.04). The advantage of respiratory fluoroquinolone was statistically significant on the drug-related adverse events (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.97). Conclusions: Current evidence shows that fluoroquinolone monotherapy has similar efficacy and favorable safety compared with β-lactam with or without macrolide for non-ICU hospitalized CAP patients. Since the limitation of region, quantity and quality of included studies, more RCTs with large scale and high quality are needed to verify the above conclusion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6517694/ /pubmed/31139081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00489 Text en Copyright © 2019 Liu, Tong, Ma, Wang, Huang, Zhang, Wu, Wang, Liu and Fan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Liu, Sitong
Tong, Xiang
Ma, Yao
Wang, Dongguang
Huang, Jizhen
Zhang, Li
Wu, Man
Wang, Lei
Liu, Tao
Fan, Hong
Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort respiratory fluoroquinolones monotherapy vs. β-lactams with or without macrolides for hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia patients: a meta-analysis
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139081
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00489
work_keys_str_mv AT liusitong respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis
AT tongxiang respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis
AT mayao respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis
AT wangdongguang respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis
AT huangjizhen respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis
AT zhangli respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis
AT wuman respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis
AT wanglei respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis
AT liutao respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis
AT fanhong respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis