Cargando…
Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis
Background: The choice of empirical antibiotic treatment for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who are admitted to non-intensive care unit (ICU) hospital wards is complicated by the limited availability of evidence. We systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of strategies of e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00489 |
_version_ | 1783418326163128320 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Sitong Tong, Xiang Ma, Yao Wang, Dongguang Huang, Jizhen Zhang, Li Wu, Man Wang, Lei Liu, Tao Fan, Hong |
author_facet | Liu, Sitong Tong, Xiang Ma, Yao Wang, Dongguang Huang, Jizhen Zhang, Li Wu, Man Wang, Lei Liu, Tao Fan, Hong |
author_sort | Liu, Sitong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The choice of empirical antibiotic treatment for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who are admitted to non-intensive care unit (ICU) hospital wards is complicated by the limited availability of evidence. We systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of strategies of empirical treatment with respiratory fluoroquinolone monotherapy and β-lactam with or without macrolide for non-ICU hospitalized CAP patients. Methods: We searched databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library (Issue11, 2018), EMbase, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), WanFang Data, VIP, and China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the comparison of respiratory fluoroquinolone monotherapy and β-lactam with or without macrolide for the non-ICU hospitalized patients with CAP up to November 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. A meta-analysis was performed with the outcomes. Results: A total of 22 studies involving 6,235 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed a non-significant trend toward an advantage to the respiratory fluoroquinolone in overall mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65–1.02). No significant difference was found between the two strategies in clinical success (the intention-to-treat population: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99–1.08; the clinically evaluable population: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.999–1.055; the population in which it was unclear whether intention-to-treat or per-protocol analysis was used: RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.99–1.09), microbiological treatment success (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.997–1.092), and length of stay (SMD −0.06, 95% CI −0.16 to 0.04). The advantage of respiratory fluoroquinolone was statistically significant on the drug-related adverse events (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.97). Conclusions: Current evidence shows that fluoroquinolone monotherapy has similar efficacy and favorable safety compared with β-lactam with or without macrolide for non-ICU hospitalized CAP patients. Since the limitation of region, quantity and quality of included studies, more RCTs with large scale and high quality are needed to verify the above conclusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6517694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65176942019-05-28 Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis Liu, Sitong Tong, Xiang Ma, Yao Wang, Dongguang Huang, Jizhen Zhang, Li Wu, Man Wang, Lei Liu, Tao Fan, Hong Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: The choice of empirical antibiotic treatment for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who are admitted to non-intensive care unit (ICU) hospital wards is complicated by the limited availability of evidence. We systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of strategies of empirical treatment with respiratory fluoroquinolone monotherapy and β-lactam with or without macrolide for non-ICU hospitalized CAP patients. Methods: We searched databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library (Issue11, 2018), EMbase, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), WanFang Data, VIP, and China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the comparison of respiratory fluoroquinolone monotherapy and β-lactam with or without macrolide for the non-ICU hospitalized patients with CAP up to November 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. A meta-analysis was performed with the outcomes. Results: A total of 22 studies involving 6,235 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed a non-significant trend toward an advantage to the respiratory fluoroquinolone in overall mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65–1.02). No significant difference was found between the two strategies in clinical success (the intention-to-treat population: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99–1.08; the clinically evaluable population: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.999–1.055; the population in which it was unclear whether intention-to-treat or per-protocol analysis was used: RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.99–1.09), microbiological treatment success (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.997–1.092), and length of stay (SMD −0.06, 95% CI −0.16 to 0.04). The advantage of respiratory fluoroquinolone was statistically significant on the drug-related adverse events (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.97). Conclusions: Current evidence shows that fluoroquinolone monotherapy has similar efficacy and favorable safety compared with β-lactam with or without macrolide for non-ICU hospitalized CAP patients. Since the limitation of region, quantity and quality of included studies, more RCTs with large scale and high quality are needed to verify the above conclusion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6517694/ /pubmed/31139081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00489 Text en Copyright © 2019 Liu, Tong, Ma, Wang, Huang, Zhang, Wu, Wang, Liu and Fan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Liu, Sitong Tong, Xiang Ma, Yao Wang, Dongguang Huang, Jizhen Zhang, Li Wu, Man Wang, Lei Liu, Tao Fan, Hong Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | respiratory fluoroquinolones monotherapy vs. β-lactams with or without macrolides for hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia patients: a meta-analysis |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00489 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liusitong respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis AT tongxiang respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis AT mayao respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis AT wangdongguang respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis AT huangjizhen respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis AT zhangli respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis AT wuman respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis AT wanglei respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis AT liutao respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis AT fanhong respiratoryfluoroquinolonesmonotherapyvsblactamswithorwithoutmacrolidesforhospitalizedcommunityacquiredpneumoniapatientsametaanalysis |