Cargando…

A Central Component of the N1 Event-Related Brain Potential Could Index the Early and Automatic Inhibition of the Actions Systematically Activated by Objects

Stimuli of the environment, like objects, systematically activate the actions they are associated to. These activations occur extremely fast. Nevertheless, behavioral data reveal that, in most cases, these activations are then automatically inhibited, around 100 ms after the occurrence of the stimul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Debruille, J. Bruno, Touzel, Molly, Segal, Julia, Snidal, Christine, Renoult, Louis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139060
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00095
_version_ 1783418331436417024
author Debruille, J. Bruno
Touzel, Molly
Segal, Julia
Snidal, Christine
Renoult, Louis
author_facet Debruille, J. Bruno
Touzel, Molly
Segal, Julia
Snidal, Christine
Renoult, Louis
author_sort Debruille, J. Bruno
collection PubMed
description Stimuli of the environment, like objects, systematically activate the actions they are associated to. These activations occur extremely fast. Nevertheless, behavioral data reveal that, in most cases, these activations are then automatically inhibited, around 100 ms after the occurrence of the stimulus. We thus tested whether this early inhibition could be indexed by a central component of the N1 event-related brain potential (ERP). To achieve that goal, we looked at whether this ERP component is larger in tasks that could increase the inhibition and in trials where reaction times (RTs) happen to be long. The illumination of a real space bar of a keyboard out of the dark was used as a stimulus. To maximize the modulation of the inhibition, the task participants had to perform was manipulated across blocks. A look-only task and a count task were used to increase inhibition and an immediate press task was used to decrease it. ERPs of the two block-conditions where presses had to be prevented and where the largest central N1s were predicted were compared to those elicited in the press task, differentiating the ERPs to the third of the trials where presses were the slowest from the ERPs to the third of the trials with the fastest presses. Despite larger negativities due to lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs) and despite greater attention likely in immediate press-trials, central N1s were found to be minimal for the fastest presses, intermediate for the slowest ones and maximal for the two no-press conditions. These results thus provide a strong support for the idea that the central N1 indexes an early and short lasting automatic inhibition of the actions systematically activated by objects. They also confirm that the strength of this automatic inhibition spontaneously fluctuates across trials and tasks. On the other hand, just before N1s, parietal P1s were found larger for fastest presses. They might thus index the initial activation of these actions. Finally, consistent with the idea that N300s index late inhibition processes, that occur preferentially when the task requires them, these ERPs were quasi absent for fast presses trials and much larger in the three other conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6517799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65177992019-05-28 A Central Component of the N1 Event-Related Brain Potential Could Index the Early and Automatic Inhibition of the Actions Systematically Activated by Objects Debruille, J. Bruno Touzel, Molly Segal, Julia Snidal, Christine Renoult, Louis Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Stimuli of the environment, like objects, systematically activate the actions they are associated to. These activations occur extremely fast. Nevertheless, behavioral data reveal that, in most cases, these activations are then automatically inhibited, around 100 ms after the occurrence of the stimulus. We thus tested whether this early inhibition could be indexed by a central component of the N1 event-related brain potential (ERP). To achieve that goal, we looked at whether this ERP component is larger in tasks that could increase the inhibition and in trials where reaction times (RTs) happen to be long. The illumination of a real space bar of a keyboard out of the dark was used as a stimulus. To maximize the modulation of the inhibition, the task participants had to perform was manipulated across blocks. A look-only task and a count task were used to increase inhibition and an immediate press task was used to decrease it. ERPs of the two block-conditions where presses had to be prevented and where the largest central N1s were predicted were compared to those elicited in the press task, differentiating the ERPs to the third of the trials where presses were the slowest from the ERPs to the third of the trials with the fastest presses. Despite larger negativities due to lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs) and despite greater attention likely in immediate press-trials, central N1s were found to be minimal for the fastest presses, intermediate for the slowest ones and maximal for the two no-press conditions. These results thus provide a strong support for the idea that the central N1 indexes an early and short lasting automatic inhibition of the actions systematically activated by objects. They also confirm that the strength of this automatic inhibition spontaneously fluctuates across trials and tasks. On the other hand, just before N1s, parietal P1s were found larger for fastest presses. They might thus index the initial activation of these actions. Finally, consistent with the idea that N300s index late inhibition processes, that occur preferentially when the task requires them, these ERPs were quasi absent for fast presses trials and much larger in the three other conditions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6517799/ /pubmed/31139060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00095 Text en Copyright © 2019 Debruille, Touzel, Segal, Snidal and Renoult. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Debruille, J. Bruno
Touzel, Molly
Segal, Julia
Snidal, Christine
Renoult, Louis
A Central Component of the N1 Event-Related Brain Potential Could Index the Early and Automatic Inhibition of the Actions Systematically Activated by Objects
title A Central Component of the N1 Event-Related Brain Potential Could Index the Early and Automatic Inhibition of the Actions Systematically Activated by Objects
title_full A Central Component of the N1 Event-Related Brain Potential Could Index the Early and Automatic Inhibition of the Actions Systematically Activated by Objects
title_fullStr A Central Component of the N1 Event-Related Brain Potential Could Index the Early and Automatic Inhibition of the Actions Systematically Activated by Objects
title_full_unstemmed A Central Component of the N1 Event-Related Brain Potential Could Index the Early and Automatic Inhibition of the Actions Systematically Activated by Objects
title_short A Central Component of the N1 Event-Related Brain Potential Could Index the Early and Automatic Inhibition of the Actions Systematically Activated by Objects
title_sort central component of the n1 event-related brain potential could index the early and automatic inhibition of the actions systematically activated by objects
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139060
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00095
work_keys_str_mv AT debruillejbruno acentralcomponentofthen1eventrelatedbrainpotentialcouldindextheearlyandautomaticinhibitionoftheactionssystematicallyactivatedbyobjects
AT touzelmolly acentralcomponentofthen1eventrelatedbrainpotentialcouldindextheearlyandautomaticinhibitionoftheactionssystematicallyactivatedbyobjects
AT segaljulia acentralcomponentofthen1eventrelatedbrainpotentialcouldindextheearlyandautomaticinhibitionoftheactionssystematicallyactivatedbyobjects
AT snidalchristine acentralcomponentofthen1eventrelatedbrainpotentialcouldindextheearlyandautomaticinhibitionoftheactionssystematicallyactivatedbyobjects
AT renoultlouis acentralcomponentofthen1eventrelatedbrainpotentialcouldindextheearlyandautomaticinhibitionoftheactionssystematicallyactivatedbyobjects
AT debruillejbruno centralcomponentofthen1eventrelatedbrainpotentialcouldindextheearlyandautomaticinhibitionoftheactionssystematicallyactivatedbyobjects
AT touzelmolly centralcomponentofthen1eventrelatedbrainpotentialcouldindextheearlyandautomaticinhibitionoftheactionssystematicallyactivatedbyobjects
AT segaljulia centralcomponentofthen1eventrelatedbrainpotentialcouldindextheearlyandautomaticinhibitionoftheactionssystematicallyactivatedbyobjects
AT snidalchristine centralcomponentofthen1eventrelatedbrainpotentialcouldindextheearlyandautomaticinhibitionoftheactionssystematicallyactivatedbyobjects
AT renoultlouis centralcomponentofthen1eventrelatedbrainpotentialcouldindextheearlyandautomaticinhibitionoftheactionssystematicallyactivatedbyobjects