Cargando…
Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design
Of all geometric shapes, a tri-oval one may be the strongest because of its capacity to bear large loads with neither rotation nor deformation. Here, we modified the external shape of a dental implant from circular to tri-oval, aiming to create a combination of high strain and low strain peri-implan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30925746 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040427 |
_version_ | 1783418358955245568 |
---|---|
author | Yin, Xing Li, Jingtao Hoffmann, Waldemar Gasser, Angelines Brunski, John B. Helms, Jill A. |
author_facet | Yin, Xing Li, Jingtao Hoffmann, Waldemar Gasser, Angelines Brunski, John B. Helms, Jill A. |
author_sort | Yin, Xing |
collection | PubMed |
description | Of all geometric shapes, a tri-oval one may be the strongest because of its capacity to bear large loads with neither rotation nor deformation. Here, we modified the external shape of a dental implant from circular to tri-oval, aiming to create a combination of high strain and low strain peri-implant environment that would ensure both primary implant stability and rapid osseointegration, respectively. Using in vivo mouse models, we tested the effects of this geometric alteration on implant survival and osseointegration over time. The maxima regions of tri-oval implants provided superior primary stability without increasing insertion torque. The minima regions of tri-oval implants presented low compressive strain and significantly less osteocyte apoptosis, which led to minimal bone resorption compared to the round implants. The rate of new bone accrual was also faster around the tri-oval implants. We further subjected both round and tri-oval implants to occlusal loading immediately after placement. In contrast to the round implants that exhibited a significant dip in stability that eventually led to their failure, the tri-oval implants maintained their stability throughout the osseointegration period. Collectively, these multiscale biomechanical analyses demonstrated the superior in vivo performance of the tri-oval implant design. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6517945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65179452019-05-31 Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design Yin, Xing Li, Jingtao Hoffmann, Waldemar Gasser, Angelines Brunski, John B. Helms, Jill A. J Clin Med Article Of all geometric shapes, a tri-oval one may be the strongest because of its capacity to bear large loads with neither rotation nor deformation. Here, we modified the external shape of a dental implant from circular to tri-oval, aiming to create a combination of high strain and low strain peri-implant environment that would ensure both primary implant stability and rapid osseointegration, respectively. Using in vivo mouse models, we tested the effects of this geometric alteration on implant survival and osseointegration over time. The maxima regions of tri-oval implants provided superior primary stability without increasing insertion torque. The minima regions of tri-oval implants presented low compressive strain and significantly less osteocyte apoptosis, which led to minimal bone resorption compared to the round implants. The rate of new bone accrual was also faster around the tri-oval implants. We further subjected both round and tri-oval implants to occlusal loading immediately after placement. In contrast to the round implants that exhibited a significant dip in stability that eventually led to their failure, the tri-oval implants maintained their stability throughout the osseointegration period. Collectively, these multiscale biomechanical analyses demonstrated the superior in vivo performance of the tri-oval implant design. MDPI 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6517945/ /pubmed/30925746 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040427 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Yin, Xing Li, Jingtao Hoffmann, Waldemar Gasser, Angelines Brunski, John B. Helms, Jill A. Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design |
title | Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design |
title_full | Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design |
title_fullStr | Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design |
title_short | Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design |
title_sort | mechanical and biological advantages of a tri-oval implant design |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30925746 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040427 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yinxing mechanicalandbiologicaladvantagesofatriovalimplantdesign AT lijingtao mechanicalandbiologicaladvantagesofatriovalimplantdesign AT hoffmannwaldemar mechanicalandbiologicaladvantagesofatriovalimplantdesign AT gasserangelines mechanicalandbiologicaladvantagesofatriovalimplantdesign AT brunskijohnb mechanicalandbiologicaladvantagesofatriovalimplantdesign AT helmsjilla mechanicalandbiologicaladvantagesofatriovalimplantdesign |