Cargando…

Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design

Of all geometric shapes, a tri-oval one may be the strongest because of its capacity to bear large loads with neither rotation nor deformation. Here, we modified the external shape of a dental implant from circular to tri-oval, aiming to create a combination of high strain and low strain peri-implan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yin, Xing, Li, Jingtao, Hoffmann, Waldemar, Gasser, Angelines, Brunski, John B., Helms, Jill A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30925746
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040427
_version_ 1783418358955245568
author Yin, Xing
Li, Jingtao
Hoffmann, Waldemar
Gasser, Angelines
Brunski, John B.
Helms, Jill A.
author_facet Yin, Xing
Li, Jingtao
Hoffmann, Waldemar
Gasser, Angelines
Brunski, John B.
Helms, Jill A.
author_sort Yin, Xing
collection PubMed
description Of all geometric shapes, a tri-oval one may be the strongest because of its capacity to bear large loads with neither rotation nor deformation. Here, we modified the external shape of a dental implant from circular to tri-oval, aiming to create a combination of high strain and low strain peri-implant environment that would ensure both primary implant stability and rapid osseointegration, respectively. Using in vivo mouse models, we tested the effects of this geometric alteration on implant survival and osseointegration over time. The maxima regions of tri-oval implants provided superior primary stability without increasing insertion torque. The minima regions of tri-oval implants presented low compressive strain and significantly less osteocyte apoptosis, which led to minimal bone resorption compared to the round implants. The rate of new bone accrual was also faster around the tri-oval implants. We further subjected both round and tri-oval implants to occlusal loading immediately after placement. In contrast to the round implants that exhibited a significant dip in stability that eventually led to their failure, the tri-oval implants maintained their stability throughout the osseointegration period. Collectively, these multiscale biomechanical analyses demonstrated the superior in vivo performance of the tri-oval implant design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6517945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65179452019-05-31 Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design Yin, Xing Li, Jingtao Hoffmann, Waldemar Gasser, Angelines Brunski, John B. Helms, Jill A. J Clin Med Article Of all geometric shapes, a tri-oval one may be the strongest because of its capacity to bear large loads with neither rotation nor deformation. Here, we modified the external shape of a dental implant from circular to tri-oval, aiming to create a combination of high strain and low strain peri-implant environment that would ensure both primary implant stability and rapid osseointegration, respectively. Using in vivo mouse models, we tested the effects of this geometric alteration on implant survival and osseointegration over time. The maxima regions of tri-oval implants provided superior primary stability without increasing insertion torque. The minima regions of tri-oval implants presented low compressive strain and significantly less osteocyte apoptosis, which led to minimal bone resorption compared to the round implants. The rate of new bone accrual was also faster around the tri-oval implants. We further subjected both round and tri-oval implants to occlusal loading immediately after placement. In contrast to the round implants that exhibited a significant dip in stability that eventually led to their failure, the tri-oval implants maintained their stability throughout the osseointegration period. Collectively, these multiscale biomechanical analyses demonstrated the superior in vivo performance of the tri-oval implant design. MDPI 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6517945/ /pubmed/30925746 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040427 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yin, Xing
Li, Jingtao
Hoffmann, Waldemar
Gasser, Angelines
Brunski, John B.
Helms, Jill A.
Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design
title Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design
title_full Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design
title_fullStr Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design
title_short Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design
title_sort mechanical and biological advantages of a tri-oval implant design
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30925746
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040427
work_keys_str_mv AT yinxing mechanicalandbiologicaladvantagesofatriovalimplantdesign
AT lijingtao mechanicalandbiologicaladvantagesofatriovalimplantdesign
AT hoffmannwaldemar mechanicalandbiologicaladvantagesofatriovalimplantdesign
AT gasserangelines mechanicalandbiologicaladvantagesofatriovalimplantdesign
AT brunskijohnb mechanicalandbiologicaladvantagesofatriovalimplantdesign
AT helmsjilla mechanicalandbiologicaladvantagesofatriovalimplantdesign