Cargando…

Is Pelvic Plexus Block Superior to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy? A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

We evaluated whether pelvic plexus block (PPB) is superior to periprostatic nerve block (PNB) for pain control during transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy (PBx). A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study was performed at a single center; 46 patients were enrolled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Do Kyung, Hah, Yoon Soo, Kim, Jong Won, Koo, Kyo Chul, Lee, Kwang Suk, Hong, Chang Hee, Chung, Byung Ha, Cho, Kang Su
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31022977
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040557
_version_ 1783418371755212800
author Kim, Do Kyung
Hah, Yoon Soo
Kim, Jong Won
Koo, Kyo Chul
Lee, Kwang Suk
Hong, Chang Hee
Chung, Byung Ha
Cho, Kang Su
author_facet Kim, Do Kyung
Hah, Yoon Soo
Kim, Jong Won
Koo, Kyo Chul
Lee, Kwang Suk
Hong, Chang Hee
Chung, Byung Ha
Cho, Kang Su
author_sort Kim, Do Kyung
collection PubMed
description We evaluated whether pelvic plexus block (PPB) is superior to periprostatic nerve block (PNB) for pain control during transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy (PBx). A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study was performed at a single center; 46 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups: PPB (n = 23) and PNB (n = 23). The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used; pain scores were measured four times: during local anesthesia, probe insertion, sampling procedures, and at 15 min post procedures. No significant differences were observed in VAS scores during local anesthesia (2.30 for PPB vs. 2.65 for PNB, p = 0.537) or during probe insertion (2.83 for PPB vs. 2.39 for PNB, p = 0.569). Similarly, no differences in VAS scores were detected during the sampling procedures (2.83 for PPB vs. 2.87 for PNB, p = 0.867) and at 15 min post procedures (1.39 for PPB vs. 1.26 for PNB, p = 0.631). No major complications were noted in either group. Both PPB and PNB are comparably effective and safe methods for PBx related pain relief, and PPB is not superior to PNB. Local anesthetic method could be selected based on the preference and skill of the operator.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6517998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65179982019-05-31 Is Pelvic Plexus Block Superior to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy? A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial Kim, Do Kyung Hah, Yoon Soo Kim, Jong Won Koo, Kyo Chul Lee, Kwang Suk Hong, Chang Hee Chung, Byung Ha Cho, Kang Su J Clin Med Article We evaluated whether pelvic plexus block (PPB) is superior to periprostatic nerve block (PNB) for pain control during transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy (PBx). A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study was performed at a single center; 46 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups: PPB (n = 23) and PNB (n = 23). The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used; pain scores were measured four times: during local anesthesia, probe insertion, sampling procedures, and at 15 min post procedures. No significant differences were observed in VAS scores during local anesthesia (2.30 for PPB vs. 2.65 for PNB, p = 0.537) or during probe insertion (2.83 for PPB vs. 2.39 for PNB, p = 0.569). Similarly, no differences in VAS scores were detected during the sampling procedures (2.83 for PPB vs. 2.87 for PNB, p = 0.867) and at 15 min post procedures (1.39 for PPB vs. 1.26 for PNB, p = 0.631). No major complications were noted in either group. Both PPB and PNB are comparably effective and safe methods for PBx related pain relief, and PPB is not superior to PNB. Local anesthetic method could be selected based on the preference and skill of the operator. MDPI 2019-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6517998/ /pubmed/31022977 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040557 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Do Kyung
Hah, Yoon Soo
Kim, Jong Won
Koo, Kyo Chul
Lee, Kwang Suk
Hong, Chang Hee
Chung, Byung Ha
Cho, Kang Su
Is Pelvic Plexus Block Superior to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy? A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title Is Pelvic Plexus Block Superior to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy? A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Is Pelvic Plexus Block Superior to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy? A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Is Pelvic Plexus Block Superior to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy? A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Is Pelvic Plexus Block Superior to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy? A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Is Pelvic Plexus Block Superior to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy? A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort is pelvic plexus block superior to periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy? a double-blind, randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31022977
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040557
work_keys_str_mv AT kimdokyung ispelvicplexusblocksuperiortoperiprostaticnerveblockforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hahyoonsoo ispelvicplexusblocksuperiortoperiprostaticnerveblockforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimjongwon ispelvicplexusblocksuperiortoperiprostaticnerveblockforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kookyochul ispelvicplexusblocksuperiortoperiprostaticnerveblockforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leekwangsuk ispelvicplexusblocksuperiortoperiprostaticnerveblockforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hongchanghee ispelvicplexusblocksuperiortoperiprostaticnerveblockforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chungbyungha ispelvicplexusblocksuperiortoperiprostaticnerveblockforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chokangsu ispelvicplexusblocksuperiortoperiprostaticnerveblockforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial