Cargando…
Is Pelvic Plexus Block Superior to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy? A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
We evaluated whether pelvic plexus block (PPB) is superior to periprostatic nerve block (PNB) for pain control during transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy (PBx). A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study was performed at a single center; 46 patients were enrolled...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31022977 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040557 |
_version_ | 1783418371755212800 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Do Kyung Hah, Yoon Soo Kim, Jong Won Koo, Kyo Chul Lee, Kwang Suk Hong, Chang Hee Chung, Byung Ha Cho, Kang Su |
author_facet | Kim, Do Kyung Hah, Yoon Soo Kim, Jong Won Koo, Kyo Chul Lee, Kwang Suk Hong, Chang Hee Chung, Byung Ha Cho, Kang Su |
author_sort | Kim, Do Kyung |
collection | PubMed |
description | We evaluated whether pelvic plexus block (PPB) is superior to periprostatic nerve block (PNB) for pain control during transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy (PBx). A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study was performed at a single center; 46 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups: PPB (n = 23) and PNB (n = 23). The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used; pain scores were measured four times: during local anesthesia, probe insertion, sampling procedures, and at 15 min post procedures. No significant differences were observed in VAS scores during local anesthesia (2.30 for PPB vs. 2.65 for PNB, p = 0.537) or during probe insertion (2.83 for PPB vs. 2.39 for PNB, p = 0.569). Similarly, no differences in VAS scores were detected during the sampling procedures (2.83 for PPB vs. 2.87 for PNB, p = 0.867) and at 15 min post procedures (1.39 for PPB vs. 1.26 for PNB, p = 0.631). No major complications were noted in either group. Both PPB and PNB are comparably effective and safe methods for PBx related pain relief, and PPB is not superior to PNB. Local anesthetic method could be selected based on the preference and skill of the operator. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6517998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65179982019-05-31 Is Pelvic Plexus Block Superior to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy? A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial Kim, Do Kyung Hah, Yoon Soo Kim, Jong Won Koo, Kyo Chul Lee, Kwang Suk Hong, Chang Hee Chung, Byung Ha Cho, Kang Su J Clin Med Article We evaluated whether pelvic plexus block (PPB) is superior to periprostatic nerve block (PNB) for pain control during transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy (PBx). A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study was performed at a single center; 46 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups: PPB (n = 23) and PNB (n = 23). The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used; pain scores were measured four times: during local anesthesia, probe insertion, sampling procedures, and at 15 min post procedures. No significant differences were observed in VAS scores during local anesthesia (2.30 for PPB vs. 2.65 for PNB, p = 0.537) or during probe insertion (2.83 for PPB vs. 2.39 for PNB, p = 0.569). Similarly, no differences in VAS scores were detected during the sampling procedures (2.83 for PPB vs. 2.87 for PNB, p = 0.867) and at 15 min post procedures (1.39 for PPB vs. 1.26 for PNB, p = 0.631). No major complications were noted in either group. Both PPB and PNB are comparably effective and safe methods for PBx related pain relief, and PPB is not superior to PNB. Local anesthetic method could be selected based on the preference and skill of the operator. MDPI 2019-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6517998/ /pubmed/31022977 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040557 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kim, Do Kyung Hah, Yoon Soo Kim, Jong Won Koo, Kyo Chul Lee, Kwang Suk Hong, Chang Hee Chung, Byung Ha Cho, Kang Su Is Pelvic Plexus Block Superior to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy? A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Is Pelvic Plexus Block Superior to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy? A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Is Pelvic Plexus Block Superior to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy? A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Is Pelvic Plexus Block Superior to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy? A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Pelvic Plexus Block Superior to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy? A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Is Pelvic Plexus Block Superior to Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Control during Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy? A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | is pelvic plexus block superior to periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy? a double-blind, randomized controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6517998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31022977 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040557 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimdokyung ispelvicplexusblocksuperiortoperiprostaticnerveblockforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hahyoonsoo ispelvicplexusblocksuperiortoperiprostaticnerveblockforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kimjongwon ispelvicplexusblocksuperiortoperiprostaticnerveblockforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kookyochul ispelvicplexusblocksuperiortoperiprostaticnerveblockforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leekwangsuk ispelvicplexusblocksuperiortoperiprostaticnerveblockforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hongchanghee ispelvicplexusblocksuperiortoperiprostaticnerveblockforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chungbyungha ispelvicplexusblocksuperiortoperiprostaticnerveblockforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chokangsu ispelvicplexusblocksuperiortoperiprostaticnerveblockforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasonographyguidedprostatebiopsyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial |