Cargando…

Conversion of Failed Hip Hemiarthroplasty to Low Friction Arthroplasty (LFA)

Purpose: We aimed to study clinical and radiological outcomes of conversion from hemiarthroplasty to Charnley hip replacement (CHR) with a particular concern over reported increased dislocation rate and literature review. Conversion of hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip replacement (THR) is a procedu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bayam, Levent, Drampalos, Efstathios, Nagai, Hajime, Kay, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6518126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31013731
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040503
_version_ 1783418399755337728
author Bayam, Levent
Drampalos, Efstathios
Nagai, Hajime
Kay, Peter
author_facet Bayam, Levent
Drampalos, Efstathios
Nagai, Hajime
Kay, Peter
author_sort Bayam, Levent
collection PubMed
description Purpose: We aimed to study clinical and radiological outcomes of conversion from hemiarthroplasty to Charnley hip replacement (CHR) with a particular concern over reported increased dislocation rate and literature review. Conversion of hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip replacement (THR) is a procedure reported to have high rates of complications. In the literature, there is no specific study on small head conversion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the conversion of failed hip hemiarthroplasty to CHR with the use of modern implants. Methods: The study included 42 patients, who underwent the above procedure. The operations were carried out using a modern Charnley-type THR with a 22-mm diameter of femoral head and a trans-trochanteric approach. The mean follow-up was 75.7 months (range 25–171). Radiographs from the last follow up were evaluated for loosening and other reasons of failure. Clinical outcome was assessed using postoperative pain, function scores, complications and implant survivorship as well as radiological evaluation. Charnley’s modified pain and mobility scoring system were used for clinical and Hodgkinson and Harris’ criteria were used for radiological assessment. Results: Functionally, all of the patients showed improvement. Mean improvement in the pain level was by average of 2.4. On mobility assessment, 38 patients (90.4%) improved. Three patients (7.1%) had recurrent infections and three (4.8%) cases were treated with revision surgery and pseudarthrosis. Further complications occurred in 19.1%, not requiring operative treatment. On radiological evaluation, one (2.4%) case showed cup demarcation without bone loss, two (4.8%) cup migration, and one (2.4%) stem demarcation. Kaplan Meier survival analysis showed a survival of 90% at 96 months of follow up (95% CI (confidence interval), 60–90). Conclusion: Larger head might not be the answer to decrease the dislocation rate. Complication rates during revision of hip hemiarthroplasty to modern CHR with 22.225-mm head diameter were comparable to first-time THR revision despite having a smaller head.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6518126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65181262019-05-31 Conversion of Failed Hip Hemiarthroplasty to Low Friction Arthroplasty (LFA) Bayam, Levent Drampalos, Efstathios Nagai, Hajime Kay, Peter J Clin Med Article Purpose: We aimed to study clinical and radiological outcomes of conversion from hemiarthroplasty to Charnley hip replacement (CHR) with a particular concern over reported increased dislocation rate and literature review. Conversion of hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip replacement (THR) is a procedure reported to have high rates of complications. In the literature, there is no specific study on small head conversion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the conversion of failed hip hemiarthroplasty to CHR with the use of modern implants. Methods: The study included 42 patients, who underwent the above procedure. The operations were carried out using a modern Charnley-type THR with a 22-mm diameter of femoral head and a trans-trochanteric approach. The mean follow-up was 75.7 months (range 25–171). Radiographs from the last follow up were evaluated for loosening and other reasons of failure. Clinical outcome was assessed using postoperative pain, function scores, complications and implant survivorship as well as radiological evaluation. Charnley’s modified pain and mobility scoring system were used for clinical and Hodgkinson and Harris’ criteria were used for radiological assessment. Results: Functionally, all of the patients showed improvement. Mean improvement in the pain level was by average of 2.4. On mobility assessment, 38 patients (90.4%) improved. Three patients (7.1%) had recurrent infections and three (4.8%) cases were treated with revision surgery and pseudarthrosis. Further complications occurred in 19.1%, not requiring operative treatment. On radiological evaluation, one (2.4%) case showed cup demarcation without bone loss, two (4.8%) cup migration, and one (2.4%) stem demarcation. Kaplan Meier survival analysis showed a survival of 90% at 96 months of follow up (95% CI (confidence interval), 60–90). Conclusion: Larger head might not be the answer to decrease the dislocation rate. Complication rates during revision of hip hemiarthroplasty to modern CHR with 22.225-mm head diameter were comparable to first-time THR revision despite having a smaller head. MDPI 2019-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6518126/ /pubmed/31013731 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040503 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bayam, Levent
Drampalos, Efstathios
Nagai, Hajime
Kay, Peter
Conversion of Failed Hip Hemiarthroplasty to Low Friction Arthroplasty (LFA)
title Conversion of Failed Hip Hemiarthroplasty to Low Friction Arthroplasty (LFA)
title_full Conversion of Failed Hip Hemiarthroplasty to Low Friction Arthroplasty (LFA)
title_fullStr Conversion of Failed Hip Hemiarthroplasty to Low Friction Arthroplasty (LFA)
title_full_unstemmed Conversion of Failed Hip Hemiarthroplasty to Low Friction Arthroplasty (LFA)
title_short Conversion of Failed Hip Hemiarthroplasty to Low Friction Arthroplasty (LFA)
title_sort conversion of failed hip hemiarthroplasty to low friction arthroplasty (lfa)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6518126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31013731
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040503
work_keys_str_mv AT bayamlevent conversionoffailedhiphemiarthroplastytolowfrictionarthroplastylfa
AT drampalosefstathios conversionoffailedhiphemiarthroplastytolowfrictionarthroplastylfa
AT nagaihajime conversionoffailedhiphemiarthroplastytolowfrictionarthroplastylfa
AT kaypeter conversionoffailedhiphemiarthroplastytolowfrictionarthroplastylfa