Cargando…
Comparison of 3-day and 7-day recall periods for food consumption reference values in foodborne disease outbreak investigations
Investigations into an outbreak of foodborne disease attempt to identify the source of illness as quickly as possible. Population-based reference values for food consumption can assist in investigation by providing comparison data for hypothesis generation and also strengthening the evidence associa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6518483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30869005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268818003370 |
_version_ | 1783418458728300544 |
---|---|
author | Morton, V. K. Thomas, M. K. Ciampa, N. Cutler, J. Hurst, M. Currie, A. |
author_facet | Morton, V. K. Thomas, M. K. Ciampa, N. Cutler, J. Hurst, M. Currie, A. |
author_sort | Morton, V. K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Investigations into an outbreak of foodborne disease attempt to identify the source of illness as quickly as possible. Population-based reference values for food consumption can assist in investigation by providing comparison data for hypothesis generation and also strengthening the evidence associated with a food product through hypothesis testing. In 2014–2015 a national phone survey was conducted in Canada to collect data on food consumption patterns using a 3- or 7-day recall period. The resulting food consumption values over the two recall periods were compared. The majority of food products did not show a significant difference in the consumption over 3 days and 7 days. However, comparison of reference values from the 3-day recall period to data from an investigation into a Salmonella Infantis outbreak was shown to support the conclusion that chicken was the source of the outbreak whereas the reference values from a 7-day recall did not support this finding. Reference values from multiple recall periods can assist in the hypothesis generation and hypothesis testing phase of foodborne outbreak investigations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6518483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65184832019-06-04 Comparison of 3-day and 7-day recall periods for food consumption reference values in foodborne disease outbreak investigations Morton, V. K. Thomas, M. K. Ciampa, N. Cutler, J. Hurst, M. Currie, A. Epidemiol Infect Original Paper Investigations into an outbreak of foodborne disease attempt to identify the source of illness as quickly as possible. Population-based reference values for food consumption can assist in investigation by providing comparison data for hypothesis generation and also strengthening the evidence associated with a food product through hypothesis testing. In 2014–2015 a national phone survey was conducted in Canada to collect data on food consumption patterns using a 3- or 7-day recall period. The resulting food consumption values over the two recall periods were compared. The majority of food products did not show a significant difference in the consumption over 3 days and 7 days. However, comparison of reference values from the 3-day recall period to data from an investigation into a Salmonella Infantis outbreak was shown to support the conclusion that chicken was the source of the outbreak whereas the reference values from a 7-day recall did not support this finding. Reference values from multiple recall periods can assist in the hypothesis generation and hypothesis testing phase of foodborne outbreak investigations. Cambridge University Press 2019-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6518483/ /pubmed/30869005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268818003370 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Morton, V. K. Thomas, M. K. Ciampa, N. Cutler, J. Hurst, M. Currie, A. Comparison of 3-day and 7-day recall periods for food consumption reference values in foodborne disease outbreak investigations |
title | Comparison of 3-day and 7-day recall periods for food consumption reference values in foodborne disease outbreak investigations |
title_full | Comparison of 3-day and 7-day recall periods for food consumption reference values in foodborne disease outbreak investigations |
title_fullStr | Comparison of 3-day and 7-day recall periods for food consumption reference values in foodborne disease outbreak investigations |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of 3-day and 7-day recall periods for food consumption reference values in foodborne disease outbreak investigations |
title_short | Comparison of 3-day and 7-day recall periods for food consumption reference values in foodborne disease outbreak investigations |
title_sort | comparison of 3-day and 7-day recall periods for food consumption reference values in foodborne disease outbreak investigations |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6518483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30869005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268818003370 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mortonvk comparisonof3dayand7dayrecallperiodsforfoodconsumptionreferencevaluesinfoodbornediseaseoutbreakinvestigations AT thomasmk comparisonof3dayand7dayrecallperiodsforfoodconsumptionreferencevaluesinfoodbornediseaseoutbreakinvestigations AT ciampan comparisonof3dayand7dayrecallperiodsforfoodconsumptionreferencevaluesinfoodbornediseaseoutbreakinvestigations AT cutlerj comparisonof3dayand7dayrecallperiodsforfoodconsumptionreferencevaluesinfoodbornediseaseoutbreakinvestigations AT hurstm comparisonof3dayand7dayrecallperiodsforfoodconsumptionreferencevaluesinfoodbornediseaseoutbreakinvestigations AT curriea comparisonof3dayand7dayrecallperiodsforfoodconsumptionreferencevaluesinfoodbornediseaseoutbreakinvestigations |