Cargando…

Effects of an examiner’s positive and negative feedback on self-assessment of skill performance, emotional response, and self-efficacy in Korea: a quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND: Feedback is an essential element in performance training. However, little effort has been made to measure the effects of positive and negative feedback on the ability of self-rated assessment, affective responses, and motivation to learn in healthcare education. METHODS: This study was a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Eun Jung, Lee, Kyeong Ryong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6518717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31088436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1595-x
_version_ 1783418512783441920
author Kim, Eun Jung
Lee, Kyeong Ryong
author_facet Kim, Eun Jung
Lee, Kyeong Ryong
author_sort Kim, Eun Jung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Feedback is an essential element in performance training. However, little effort has been made to measure the effects of positive and negative feedback on the ability of self-rated assessment, affective responses, and motivation to learn in healthcare education. METHODS: This study was a quasi-experimental posttest design to examine the effects of an examiner’s positive and negative verbal feedback on the accuracy of self-assessment, emotional responses, and self-efficacy. Second-year nursing students were recruited in a university in South Korea. A total of 110 participants were assigned randomly to a positive feedback (PF) group (n = 58) and a negative feedback (NF) group (n = 52). All participants completed the performance measure and then received a positive or negative feedback from an evaluator. After delivery of feedback, they assessed their own performance using the same sheet as the evaluator’s and completed the survey for emotional response and self-efficacy. Chi-squared tests, Fisher’s exact tests, independent sample Student’s t tests, and Mann–Whitney nonparametric U tests, and Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to compare the baseline measurements of the demographic characteristics and the dependent variables between the PF and NF groups. RESULTS: The NF group demonstrated a more accurate self-rated assessment than the PF group (p <  0.001). While self-efficacy (p <  0.001) and positive emotions (p <  0.001) were significantly stronger in the PF group than in the NF group, negative emotions were significantly stronger in the NF group than in the PF group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluator’s verbal feedback exerts a significant influence on the accuracy of self-assessment as well as emotions and self-efficacy. Instructors should pay attention to providing feedback to students, taking into account the impact of positive or negative feedback.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6518717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65187172019-05-21 Effects of an examiner’s positive and negative feedback on self-assessment of skill performance, emotional response, and self-efficacy in Korea: a quasi-experimental study Kim, Eun Jung Lee, Kyeong Ryong BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Feedback is an essential element in performance training. However, little effort has been made to measure the effects of positive and negative feedback on the ability of self-rated assessment, affective responses, and motivation to learn in healthcare education. METHODS: This study was a quasi-experimental posttest design to examine the effects of an examiner’s positive and negative verbal feedback on the accuracy of self-assessment, emotional responses, and self-efficacy. Second-year nursing students were recruited in a university in South Korea. A total of 110 participants were assigned randomly to a positive feedback (PF) group (n = 58) and a negative feedback (NF) group (n = 52). All participants completed the performance measure and then received a positive or negative feedback from an evaluator. After delivery of feedback, they assessed their own performance using the same sheet as the evaluator’s and completed the survey for emotional response and self-efficacy. Chi-squared tests, Fisher’s exact tests, independent sample Student’s t tests, and Mann–Whitney nonparametric U tests, and Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to compare the baseline measurements of the demographic characteristics and the dependent variables between the PF and NF groups. RESULTS: The NF group demonstrated a more accurate self-rated assessment than the PF group (p <  0.001). While self-efficacy (p <  0.001) and positive emotions (p <  0.001) were significantly stronger in the PF group than in the NF group, negative emotions were significantly stronger in the NF group than in the PF group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluator’s verbal feedback exerts a significant influence on the accuracy of self-assessment as well as emotions and self-efficacy. Instructors should pay attention to providing feedback to students, taking into account the impact of positive or negative feedback. BioMed Central 2019-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6518717/ /pubmed/31088436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1595-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Eun Jung
Lee, Kyeong Ryong
Effects of an examiner’s positive and negative feedback on self-assessment of skill performance, emotional response, and self-efficacy in Korea: a quasi-experimental study
title Effects of an examiner’s positive and negative feedback on self-assessment of skill performance, emotional response, and self-efficacy in Korea: a quasi-experimental study
title_full Effects of an examiner’s positive and negative feedback on self-assessment of skill performance, emotional response, and self-efficacy in Korea: a quasi-experimental study
title_fullStr Effects of an examiner’s positive and negative feedback on self-assessment of skill performance, emotional response, and self-efficacy in Korea: a quasi-experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of an examiner’s positive and negative feedback on self-assessment of skill performance, emotional response, and self-efficacy in Korea: a quasi-experimental study
title_short Effects of an examiner’s positive and negative feedback on self-assessment of skill performance, emotional response, and self-efficacy in Korea: a quasi-experimental study
title_sort effects of an examiner’s positive and negative feedback on self-assessment of skill performance, emotional response, and self-efficacy in korea: a quasi-experimental study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6518717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31088436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1595-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kimeunjung effectsofanexaminerspositiveandnegativefeedbackonselfassessmentofskillperformanceemotionalresponseandselfefficacyinkoreaaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT leekyeongryong effectsofanexaminerspositiveandnegativefeedbackonselfassessmentofskillperformanceemotionalresponseandselfefficacyinkoreaaquasiexperimentalstudy