Cargando…
Evaluating corrections for Eddy‐currents and other EPI distortions in diffusion MRI: methodology and a dataset for benchmarking
PURPOSE: To propose a methodology for assessment of algorithms that correct distortions due to motion, eddy‐currents, and echo planar imaging in diffusion weighted images (DWIs). METHODS: The proposed method evaluates correction performance by measuring variability across datasets of the same object...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6518940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30394561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27577 |
_version_ | 1783418554302857216 |
---|---|
author | Irfanoglu, M. Okan Sarlls, Joelle Nayak, Amritha Pierpaoli, Carlo |
author_facet | Irfanoglu, M. Okan Sarlls, Joelle Nayak, Amritha Pierpaoli, Carlo |
author_sort | Irfanoglu, M. Okan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To propose a methodology for assessment of algorithms that correct distortions due to motion, eddy‐currents, and echo planar imaging in diffusion weighted images (DWIs). METHODS: The proposed method evaluates correction performance by measuring variability across datasets of the same object acquired with images having distortions in different directions, thereby overcoming the unavailability of ground‐truth, undistorted DWIs. A comprehensive diffusion MRI dataset, collected using a suitable experimental design, is made available to the scientific community, consisting of three DWI shells (Bmax = 5000 s/mm(2)), 30 gradient directions, a replicate set of antipodal gradient directions, four phase‐encoding directions, and three different head orientations. The proposed methodology was tested using the TORTOISE diffusion MRI processing pipeline. RESULTS: The median variability of the original distorted data was 123% higher for DWIs, 100–168% higher for tensor‐derived metrics and 28–111% higher for MAPMRI metrics, than in the corrected versions. EPI distortions induced substantial variability, nearly comparable to the contribution of eddy‐current distortions. CONCLUSIONS: The dataset and the evaluation strategy proposed herein enable quantitative comparison of different methods for correction of distortions due to motion, eddy‐currents, and other EPI distortions, and can be useful in benchmarking newly developed algorithms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6518940 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65189402019-05-21 Evaluating corrections for Eddy‐currents and other EPI distortions in diffusion MRI: methodology and a dataset for benchmarking Irfanoglu, M. Okan Sarlls, Joelle Nayak, Amritha Pierpaoli, Carlo Magn Reson Med Full Papers—Computer Processing and Modeling PURPOSE: To propose a methodology for assessment of algorithms that correct distortions due to motion, eddy‐currents, and echo planar imaging in diffusion weighted images (DWIs). METHODS: The proposed method evaluates correction performance by measuring variability across datasets of the same object acquired with images having distortions in different directions, thereby overcoming the unavailability of ground‐truth, undistorted DWIs. A comprehensive diffusion MRI dataset, collected using a suitable experimental design, is made available to the scientific community, consisting of three DWI shells (Bmax = 5000 s/mm(2)), 30 gradient directions, a replicate set of antipodal gradient directions, four phase‐encoding directions, and three different head orientations. The proposed methodology was tested using the TORTOISE diffusion MRI processing pipeline. RESULTS: The median variability of the original distorted data was 123% higher for DWIs, 100–168% higher for tensor‐derived metrics and 28–111% higher for MAPMRI metrics, than in the corrected versions. EPI distortions induced substantial variability, nearly comparable to the contribution of eddy‐current distortions. CONCLUSIONS: The dataset and the evaluation strategy proposed herein enable quantitative comparison of different methods for correction of distortions due to motion, eddy‐currents, and other EPI distortions, and can be useful in benchmarking newly developed algorithms. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-05 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6518940/ /pubmed/30394561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27577 Text en © 2018 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Full Papers—Computer Processing and Modeling Irfanoglu, M. Okan Sarlls, Joelle Nayak, Amritha Pierpaoli, Carlo Evaluating corrections for Eddy‐currents and other EPI distortions in diffusion MRI: methodology and a dataset for benchmarking |
title | Evaluating corrections for Eddy‐currents and other EPI distortions in diffusion MRI: methodology and a dataset for benchmarking |
title_full | Evaluating corrections for Eddy‐currents and other EPI distortions in diffusion MRI: methodology and a dataset for benchmarking |
title_fullStr | Evaluating corrections for Eddy‐currents and other EPI distortions in diffusion MRI: methodology and a dataset for benchmarking |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating corrections for Eddy‐currents and other EPI distortions in diffusion MRI: methodology and a dataset for benchmarking |
title_short | Evaluating corrections for Eddy‐currents and other EPI distortions in diffusion MRI: methodology and a dataset for benchmarking |
title_sort | evaluating corrections for eddy‐currents and other epi distortions in diffusion mri: methodology and a dataset for benchmarking |
topic | Full Papers—Computer Processing and Modeling |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6518940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30394561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27577 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT irfanoglumokan evaluatingcorrectionsforeddycurrentsandotherepidistortionsindiffusionmrimethodologyandadatasetforbenchmarking AT sarllsjoelle evaluatingcorrectionsforeddycurrentsandotherepidistortionsindiffusionmrimethodologyandadatasetforbenchmarking AT nayakamritha evaluatingcorrectionsforeddycurrentsandotherepidistortionsindiffusionmrimethodologyandadatasetforbenchmarking AT pierpaolicarlo evaluatingcorrectionsforeddycurrentsandotherepidistortionsindiffusionmrimethodologyandadatasetforbenchmarking |