Cargando…

Medication Safety: A Need to Relook at Double-Checking Medicines?

OBJECTIVE: To present a structured evaluation process that provides evidence that the single-checking (SC) system is not only a viable option in reducing medication errors, but also has the added advantage of increasing staff satisfaction. METHODS: The structured evaluation involved one work improve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chua, Gek Phin, Lee, Kim Hua, Peralta, Gemma Diente, Lim, John Heng Chi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6518982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31259220
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_2_19
_version_ 1783418562679930880
author Chua, Gek Phin
Lee, Kim Hua
Peralta, Gemma Diente
Lim, John Heng Chi
author_facet Chua, Gek Phin
Lee, Kim Hua
Peralta, Gemma Diente
Lim, John Heng Chi
author_sort Chua, Gek Phin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To present a structured evaluation process that provides evidence that the single-checking (SC) system is not only a viable option in reducing medication errors, but also has the added advantage of increasing staff satisfaction. METHODS: The structured evaluation involved one work improvement process and conducting a survey establishing registered nurses’ (RNs’) attitude toward SC of medicines. The survey questionnaire included 12 questions with a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: In spite of the increased number of patients, the number of medication errors actually reduced (P < 0.001; two-sample test of proportions) with the implementation of SC of medication for competent and experienced staff. A survey was conducted to establish RNs’ attitudes toward SC of medicines 3 years post SC implementation. RNs viewed the single-nurse checking protocol positively. In particular, the nurses considered single-nurse checking as an encouragement to update their drug knowledge and as a time-saving measure, enhancing the quality of patient care. Nonetheless, they also expressed concerns on single-nurse checking. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide evidence that SC system is a viable way to reducing medication errors and also confer the added advantage of staff satisfaction. Assuring quality and safety involves the need to challenge the status quo based on revealed evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6518982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65189822019-07-01 Medication Safety: A Need to Relook at Double-Checking Medicines? Chua, Gek Phin Lee, Kim Hua Peralta, Gemma Diente Lim, John Heng Chi Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs Original Article OBJECTIVE: To present a structured evaluation process that provides evidence that the single-checking (SC) system is not only a viable option in reducing medication errors, but also has the added advantage of increasing staff satisfaction. METHODS: The structured evaluation involved one work improvement process and conducting a survey establishing registered nurses’ (RNs’) attitude toward SC of medicines. The survey questionnaire included 12 questions with a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: In spite of the increased number of patients, the number of medication errors actually reduced (P < 0.001; two-sample test of proportions) with the implementation of SC of medication for competent and experienced staff. A survey was conducted to establish RNs’ attitudes toward SC of medicines 3 years post SC implementation. RNs viewed the single-nurse checking protocol positively. In particular, the nurses considered single-nurse checking as an encouragement to update their drug knowledge and as a time-saving measure, enhancing the quality of patient care. Nonetheless, they also expressed concerns on single-nurse checking. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide evidence that SC system is a viable way to reducing medication errors and also confer the added advantage of staff satisfaction. Assuring quality and safety involves the need to challenge the status quo based on revealed evidence. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6518982/ /pubmed/31259220 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_2_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Ann & Joshua Medical Publishing Co. Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chua, Gek Phin
Lee, Kim Hua
Peralta, Gemma Diente
Lim, John Heng Chi
Medication Safety: A Need to Relook at Double-Checking Medicines?
title Medication Safety: A Need to Relook at Double-Checking Medicines?
title_full Medication Safety: A Need to Relook at Double-Checking Medicines?
title_fullStr Medication Safety: A Need to Relook at Double-Checking Medicines?
title_full_unstemmed Medication Safety: A Need to Relook at Double-Checking Medicines?
title_short Medication Safety: A Need to Relook at Double-Checking Medicines?
title_sort medication safety: a need to relook at double-checking medicines?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6518982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31259220
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_2_19
work_keys_str_mv AT chuagekphin medicationsafetyaneedtorelookatdoublecheckingmedicines
AT leekimhua medicationsafetyaneedtorelookatdoublecheckingmedicines
AT peraltagemmadiente medicationsafetyaneedtorelookatdoublecheckingmedicines
AT limjohnhengchi medicationsafetyaneedtorelookatdoublecheckingmedicines