Cargando…

Rigid motion‐corrected magnetic resonance fingerprinting

PURPOSE: Develop a method for rigid body motion‐corrected magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF). METHODS: MRF has shown some robustness to abrupt motion toward the end of the acquisition. Here, we study the effects of different types of rigid body motion during the acquisition on MRF and propose a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cruz, Gastão, Jaubert, Olivier, Schneider, Torben, Botnar, Rene M., Prieto, Claudia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30229558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27448
_version_ 1783418589369335808
author Cruz, Gastão
Jaubert, Olivier
Schneider, Torben
Botnar, Rene M.
Prieto, Claudia
author_facet Cruz, Gastão
Jaubert, Olivier
Schneider, Torben
Botnar, Rene M.
Prieto, Claudia
author_sort Cruz, Gastão
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Develop a method for rigid body motion‐corrected magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF). METHODS: MRF has shown some robustness to abrupt motion toward the end of the acquisition. Here, we study the effects of different types of rigid body motion during the acquisition on MRF and propose a novel approach to correct for this motion. The proposed method (MC‐MRF) follows 4 steps: (1) sliding window reconstruction is performed to produce high‐quality auxiliary dynamic images; (2) rotation and translation motion is estimated from the dynamic images by image registration; (3) estimated motion is used to correct acquired k‐space data with corresponding rotations and phase shifts; and (4) motion‐corrected data are reconstructed with low‐rank inversion. MC‐MRF was validated in a standard T(1)/T(2) phantom and 2D in vivo brain acquisitions in 7 healthy subjects. Additionally, the effect of through‐plane motion in 2D MC‐MRF was investigated. RESULTS: Simulation results show that motion in MRF can introduce artifacts in T(1) and T(2) maps, depending when it occurs. MC‐MRF improved parametric map quality in all phantom and in vivo experiments with in‐plane motion, comparable to the no‐motion ground truth. Reduced parametric map quality, even after motion correction, was observed for acquisitions with through‐plane motion, particularly for smaller structures in T(2) maps. CONCLUSION: Here, a novel method for motion correction in MRF (MC‐MRF) is proposed, which improves parametric map quality and accuracy in comparison to no‐motion correction approaches. Future work will include validation of 3D MC‐MRF to enable also through‐plane motion correction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6519164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65191642019-05-21 Rigid motion‐corrected magnetic resonance fingerprinting Cruz, Gastão Jaubert, Olivier Schneider, Torben Botnar, Rene M. Prieto, Claudia Magn Reson Med Full Papers—Imaging Methodology PURPOSE: Develop a method for rigid body motion‐corrected magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF). METHODS: MRF has shown some robustness to abrupt motion toward the end of the acquisition. Here, we study the effects of different types of rigid body motion during the acquisition on MRF and propose a novel approach to correct for this motion. The proposed method (MC‐MRF) follows 4 steps: (1) sliding window reconstruction is performed to produce high‐quality auxiliary dynamic images; (2) rotation and translation motion is estimated from the dynamic images by image registration; (3) estimated motion is used to correct acquired k‐space data with corresponding rotations and phase shifts; and (4) motion‐corrected data are reconstructed with low‐rank inversion. MC‐MRF was validated in a standard T(1)/T(2) phantom and 2D in vivo brain acquisitions in 7 healthy subjects. Additionally, the effect of through‐plane motion in 2D MC‐MRF was investigated. RESULTS: Simulation results show that motion in MRF can introduce artifacts in T(1) and T(2) maps, depending when it occurs. MC‐MRF improved parametric map quality in all phantom and in vivo experiments with in‐plane motion, comparable to the no‐motion ground truth. Reduced parametric map quality, even after motion correction, was observed for acquisitions with through‐plane motion, particularly for smaller structures in T(2) maps. CONCLUSION: Here, a novel method for motion correction in MRF (MC‐MRF) is proposed, which improves parametric map quality and accuracy in comparison to no‐motion correction approaches. Future work will include validation of 3D MC‐MRF to enable also through‐plane motion correction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-03 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6519164/ /pubmed/30229558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27448 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers—Imaging Methodology
Cruz, Gastão
Jaubert, Olivier
Schneider, Torben
Botnar, Rene M.
Prieto, Claudia
Rigid motion‐corrected magnetic resonance fingerprinting
title Rigid motion‐corrected magnetic resonance fingerprinting
title_full Rigid motion‐corrected magnetic resonance fingerprinting
title_fullStr Rigid motion‐corrected magnetic resonance fingerprinting
title_full_unstemmed Rigid motion‐corrected magnetic resonance fingerprinting
title_short Rigid motion‐corrected magnetic resonance fingerprinting
title_sort rigid motion‐corrected magnetic resonance fingerprinting
topic Full Papers—Imaging Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30229558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27448
work_keys_str_mv AT cruzgastao rigidmotioncorrectedmagneticresonancefingerprinting
AT jaubertolivier rigidmotioncorrectedmagneticresonancefingerprinting
AT schneidertorben rigidmotioncorrectedmagneticresonancefingerprinting
AT botnarrenem rigidmotioncorrectedmagneticresonancefingerprinting
AT prietoclaudia rigidmotioncorrectedmagneticresonancefingerprinting