Cargando…
Which individual, social and environmental influences shape key phases in the amphetamine type stimulant use trajectory? A systematic narrative review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is limited evidence on what shapes amphetamine‐type stimulant (ATS) use trajectories. This systematic narrative review and qualitative synthesis aimed to identify individual, social and environmental influences shaping key phases in the ATS use trajectory: initiation, cont...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30176077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14434 |
_version_ | 1783418608177643520 |
---|---|
author | O'Donnell, Amy Addison, Michelle Spencer, Liam Zurhold, Heike Rosenkranz, Moritz McGovern, Ruth Gilvarry, Eilish Martens, Marcus‐Sebastian Verthein, Uwe Kaner, Eileen |
author_facet | O'Donnell, Amy Addison, Michelle Spencer, Liam Zurhold, Heike Rosenkranz, Moritz McGovern, Ruth Gilvarry, Eilish Martens, Marcus‐Sebastian Verthein, Uwe Kaner, Eileen |
author_sort | O'Donnell, Amy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is limited evidence on what shapes amphetamine‐type stimulant (ATS) use trajectories. This systematic narrative review and qualitative synthesis aimed to identify individual, social and environmental influences shaping key phases in the ATS use trajectory: initiation, continuation, increase/relapse and decrease/abstinence. METHODS: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and PROQUEST (social science premium collection) were searched from 2000 to 2018. Studies of any qualitative design were eligible for inclusion. Extracted data were analysed according to four key phases within drug pathways, and then cross‐analysed for individual, social and environmental influences. RESULTS: Forty‐four papers based on 39 unique studies were included, reporting the views of 1879 ATS users. Participants were aged 14–58 years, from varied socio‐economic and demographic groups, and located in North America, Europe, Australasia and South East Asia. Reasons for initiation included: to boost performance at work and in sexual relationships, promote a sense of social ‘belonging’ and help manage stress. Similar reasons motivated continued use, combined with the challenge of managing withdrawal effects in long‐term users. Increased tolerance and/or experiencing a critical life event contributed to an increase in use. Reasons for decrease focused on: increased awareness of the negative health impacts of long‐term use, disconnecting from social networks or relationships and financial instability. CONCLUSIONS: Amphetamine‐type stimulant users are a highly diverse population, and their drug use careers are shaped by a complex dynamic of individual, social and environmental factors. Tailored, joined‐up interventions are needed to address users’ overlapping economic, health and social care needs in order to support long‐term abstinence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6519251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65192512019-05-21 Which individual, social and environmental influences shape key phases in the amphetamine type stimulant use trajectory? A systematic narrative review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature O'Donnell, Amy Addison, Michelle Spencer, Liam Zurhold, Heike Rosenkranz, Moritz McGovern, Ruth Gilvarry, Eilish Martens, Marcus‐Sebastian Verthein, Uwe Kaner, Eileen Addiction Review BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is limited evidence on what shapes amphetamine‐type stimulant (ATS) use trajectories. This systematic narrative review and qualitative synthesis aimed to identify individual, social and environmental influences shaping key phases in the ATS use trajectory: initiation, continuation, increase/relapse and decrease/abstinence. METHODS: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and PROQUEST (social science premium collection) were searched from 2000 to 2018. Studies of any qualitative design were eligible for inclusion. Extracted data were analysed according to four key phases within drug pathways, and then cross‐analysed for individual, social and environmental influences. RESULTS: Forty‐four papers based on 39 unique studies were included, reporting the views of 1879 ATS users. Participants were aged 14–58 years, from varied socio‐economic and demographic groups, and located in North America, Europe, Australasia and South East Asia. Reasons for initiation included: to boost performance at work and in sexual relationships, promote a sense of social ‘belonging’ and help manage stress. Similar reasons motivated continued use, combined with the challenge of managing withdrawal effects in long‐term users. Increased tolerance and/or experiencing a critical life event contributed to an increase in use. Reasons for decrease focused on: increased awareness of the negative health impacts of long‐term use, disconnecting from social networks or relationships and financial instability. CONCLUSIONS: Amphetamine‐type stimulant users are a highly diverse population, and their drug use careers are shaped by a complex dynamic of individual, social and environmental factors. Tailored, joined‐up interventions are needed to address users’ overlapping economic, health and social care needs in order to support long‐term abstinence. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-12 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6519251/ /pubmed/30176077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14434 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Review O'Donnell, Amy Addison, Michelle Spencer, Liam Zurhold, Heike Rosenkranz, Moritz McGovern, Ruth Gilvarry, Eilish Martens, Marcus‐Sebastian Verthein, Uwe Kaner, Eileen Which individual, social and environmental influences shape key phases in the amphetamine type stimulant use trajectory? A systematic narrative review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature |
title | Which individual, social and environmental influences shape key phases in the amphetamine type stimulant use trajectory? A systematic narrative review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature |
title_full | Which individual, social and environmental influences shape key phases in the amphetamine type stimulant use trajectory? A systematic narrative review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature |
title_fullStr | Which individual, social and environmental influences shape key phases in the amphetamine type stimulant use trajectory? A systematic narrative review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Which individual, social and environmental influences shape key phases in the amphetamine type stimulant use trajectory? A systematic narrative review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature |
title_short | Which individual, social and environmental influences shape key phases in the amphetamine type stimulant use trajectory? A systematic narrative review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature |
title_sort | which individual, social and environmental influences shape key phases in the amphetamine type stimulant use trajectory? a systematic narrative review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30176077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14434 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT odonnellamy whichindividualsocialandenvironmentalinfluencesshapekeyphasesintheamphetaminetypestimulantusetrajectoryasystematicnarrativereviewandthematicsynthesisofthequalitativeliterature AT addisonmichelle whichindividualsocialandenvironmentalinfluencesshapekeyphasesintheamphetaminetypestimulantusetrajectoryasystematicnarrativereviewandthematicsynthesisofthequalitativeliterature AT spencerliam whichindividualsocialandenvironmentalinfluencesshapekeyphasesintheamphetaminetypestimulantusetrajectoryasystematicnarrativereviewandthematicsynthesisofthequalitativeliterature AT zurholdheike whichindividualsocialandenvironmentalinfluencesshapekeyphasesintheamphetaminetypestimulantusetrajectoryasystematicnarrativereviewandthematicsynthesisofthequalitativeliterature AT rosenkranzmoritz whichindividualsocialandenvironmentalinfluencesshapekeyphasesintheamphetaminetypestimulantusetrajectoryasystematicnarrativereviewandthematicsynthesisofthequalitativeliterature AT mcgovernruth whichindividualsocialandenvironmentalinfluencesshapekeyphasesintheamphetaminetypestimulantusetrajectoryasystematicnarrativereviewandthematicsynthesisofthequalitativeliterature AT gilvarryeilish whichindividualsocialandenvironmentalinfluencesshapekeyphasesintheamphetaminetypestimulantusetrajectoryasystematicnarrativereviewandthematicsynthesisofthequalitativeliterature AT martensmarcussebastian whichindividualsocialandenvironmentalinfluencesshapekeyphasesintheamphetaminetypestimulantusetrajectoryasystematicnarrativereviewandthematicsynthesisofthequalitativeliterature AT vertheinuwe whichindividualsocialandenvironmentalinfluencesshapekeyphasesintheamphetaminetypestimulantusetrajectoryasystematicnarrativereviewandthematicsynthesisofthequalitativeliterature AT kanereileen whichindividualsocialandenvironmentalinfluencesshapekeyphasesintheamphetaminetypestimulantusetrajectoryasystematicnarrativereviewandthematicsynthesisofthequalitativeliterature |