Cargando…

Availability of less invasive prenatal, perinatal and paediatric autopsy will improve uptake rates: a mixed‐methods study with bereaved parents

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether less invasive methods of autopsy would be acceptable to bereaved parents and likely to increase uptake. DESIGN: Mixed methods study. SETTING: Bereaved parents recruited prospectively across seven hospitals in England and retrospectively through four parent support o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewis, C, Riddington, M, Hill, M, Arthurs, OJ, Hutchinson, JC, Chitty, LS, Bevan, C, Fisher, J, Ward, J, Sebire, NJ
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30576088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15591
_version_ 1783418612094074880
author Lewis, C
Riddington, M
Hill, M
Arthurs, OJ
Hutchinson, JC
Chitty, LS
Bevan, C
Fisher, J
Ward, J
Sebire, NJ
author_facet Lewis, C
Riddington, M
Hill, M
Arthurs, OJ
Hutchinson, JC
Chitty, LS
Bevan, C
Fisher, J
Ward, J
Sebire, NJ
author_sort Lewis, C
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether less invasive methods of autopsy would be acceptable to bereaved parents and likely to increase uptake. DESIGN: Mixed methods study. SETTING: Bereaved parents recruited prospectively across seven hospitals in England and retrospectively through four parent support organisations. SAMPLE: Eight hundred and fifty‐nine surveys and 20 interviews with bereaved parents. METHODS: Cross‐sectional survey and qualitative semi‐structured telephone interviews. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Likely uptake, preferences, factors impacting decision‐making, views on different autopsy methods. RESULTS: Overall, 90.5% of participants indicated that they would consent to some form of less invasive autopsy [either minimally invasive autopsy (MIA), non‐invasive autopsy (NIA) or both]; 53.8% would consent to standard autopsy, 74.3% to MIA and 77.3% to NIA. Regarding parental preferences, 45.5% preferred MIA, 30.8% preferred NIA and 14.3% preferred standard autopsy. Participants who indicated they would decline standard autopsy but would consent to a less invasive option were significantly more likely to have a lower educational level (odds ratio 0.49; 95% CI 0.35–0.70; P = 0.000062). Qualitative findings suggest that parents value NIA because of the lack of any incision and MIA is considered a good compromise as it enables tissue sampling while easing the parental burden associated with consenting to standard autopsy. CONCLUSION: Less invasive methods of autopsy are acceptable alternatives for bereaved parents, and if offered, are likely to increase uptake and improve parental experience. Further health economic, validation and implementation studies are now required to assess the viability of offering these in routine widespread clinical care. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Mixed methods UK study finds less invasive methods of autopsy are acceptable alternatives for bereaved parents, and if offered, are likely to increase uptake and improve parental experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6519272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65192722019-05-23 Availability of less invasive prenatal, perinatal and paediatric autopsy will improve uptake rates: a mixed‐methods study with bereaved parents Lewis, C Riddington, M Hill, M Arthurs, OJ Hutchinson, JC Chitty, LS Bevan, C Fisher, J Ward, J Sebire, NJ BJOG General Obstetrics OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether less invasive methods of autopsy would be acceptable to bereaved parents and likely to increase uptake. DESIGN: Mixed methods study. SETTING: Bereaved parents recruited prospectively across seven hospitals in England and retrospectively through four parent support organisations. SAMPLE: Eight hundred and fifty‐nine surveys and 20 interviews with bereaved parents. METHODS: Cross‐sectional survey and qualitative semi‐structured telephone interviews. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Likely uptake, preferences, factors impacting decision‐making, views on different autopsy methods. RESULTS: Overall, 90.5% of participants indicated that they would consent to some form of less invasive autopsy [either minimally invasive autopsy (MIA), non‐invasive autopsy (NIA) or both]; 53.8% would consent to standard autopsy, 74.3% to MIA and 77.3% to NIA. Regarding parental preferences, 45.5% preferred MIA, 30.8% preferred NIA and 14.3% preferred standard autopsy. Participants who indicated they would decline standard autopsy but would consent to a less invasive option were significantly more likely to have a lower educational level (odds ratio 0.49; 95% CI 0.35–0.70; P = 0.000062). Qualitative findings suggest that parents value NIA because of the lack of any incision and MIA is considered a good compromise as it enables tissue sampling while easing the parental burden associated with consenting to standard autopsy. CONCLUSION: Less invasive methods of autopsy are acceptable alternatives for bereaved parents, and if offered, are likely to increase uptake and improve parental experience. Further health economic, validation and implementation studies are now required to assess the viability of offering these in routine widespread clinical care. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Mixed methods UK study finds less invasive methods of autopsy are acceptable alternatives for bereaved parents, and if offered, are likely to increase uptake and improve parental experience. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-06 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6519272/ /pubmed/30576088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15591 Text en © 2018 The Authors BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle General Obstetrics
Lewis, C
Riddington, M
Hill, M
Arthurs, OJ
Hutchinson, JC
Chitty, LS
Bevan, C
Fisher, J
Ward, J
Sebire, NJ
Availability of less invasive prenatal, perinatal and paediatric autopsy will improve uptake rates: a mixed‐methods study with bereaved parents
title Availability of less invasive prenatal, perinatal and paediatric autopsy will improve uptake rates: a mixed‐methods study with bereaved parents
title_full Availability of less invasive prenatal, perinatal and paediatric autopsy will improve uptake rates: a mixed‐methods study with bereaved parents
title_fullStr Availability of less invasive prenatal, perinatal and paediatric autopsy will improve uptake rates: a mixed‐methods study with bereaved parents
title_full_unstemmed Availability of less invasive prenatal, perinatal and paediatric autopsy will improve uptake rates: a mixed‐methods study with bereaved parents
title_short Availability of less invasive prenatal, perinatal and paediatric autopsy will improve uptake rates: a mixed‐methods study with bereaved parents
title_sort availability of less invasive prenatal, perinatal and paediatric autopsy will improve uptake rates: a mixed‐methods study with bereaved parents
topic General Obstetrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30576088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15591
work_keys_str_mv AT lewisc availabilityoflessinvasiveprenatalperinatalandpaediatricautopsywillimproveuptakeratesamixedmethodsstudywithbereavedparents
AT riddingtonm availabilityoflessinvasiveprenatalperinatalandpaediatricautopsywillimproveuptakeratesamixedmethodsstudywithbereavedparents
AT hillm availabilityoflessinvasiveprenatalperinatalandpaediatricautopsywillimproveuptakeratesamixedmethodsstudywithbereavedparents
AT arthursoj availabilityoflessinvasiveprenatalperinatalandpaediatricautopsywillimproveuptakeratesamixedmethodsstudywithbereavedparents
AT hutchinsonjc availabilityoflessinvasiveprenatalperinatalandpaediatricautopsywillimproveuptakeratesamixedmethodsstudywithbereavedparents
AT chittyls availabilityoflessinvasiveprenatalperinatalandpaediatricautopsywillimproveuptakeratesamixedmethodsstudywithbereavedparents
AT bevanc availabilityoflessinvasiveprenatalperinatalandpaediatricautopsywillimproveuptakeratesamixedmethodsstudywithbereavedparents
AT fisherj availabilityoflessinvasiveprenatalperinatalandpaediatricautopsywillimproveuptakeratesamixedmethodsstudywithbereavedparents
AT wardj availabilityoflessinvasiveprenatalperinatalandpaediatricautopsywillimproveuptakeratesamixedmethodsstudywithbereavedparents
AT sebirenj availabilityoflessinvasiveprenatalperinatalandpaediatricautopsywillimproveuptakeratesamixedmethodsstudywithbereavedparents