Cargando…

Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat

To improve the outcome after autologous nerve grafting in the clinic, it is important to understand the limiting variables such as distinct phenotypes of motor and sensory Schwann cells. This study investigated the properties of phenotypically different autografts in a 6 mm femoral nerve defect mode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hercher, David, Kerbl, Markus, Schuh, Christina M. A. P., Heinzel, Johannes, Gal, László, Stainer, Michaela, Schmidhammer, Robert, Hausner, Thomas, Redl, Heinz, Nógrádi, Antal, Hacobian, Ara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139050
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00182
_version_ 1783418617873825792
author Hercher, David
Kerbl, Markus
Schuh, Christina M. A. P.
Heinzel, Johannes
Gal, László
Stainer, Michaela
Schmidhammer, Robert
Hausner, Thomas
Redl, Heinz
Nógrádi, Antal
Hacobian, Ara
author_facet Hercher, David
Kerbl, Markus
Schuh, Christina M. A. P.
Heinzel, Johannes
Gal, László
Stainer, Michaela
Schmidhammer, Robert
Hausner, Thomas
Redl, Heinz
Nógrádi, Antal
Hacobian, Ara
author_sort Hercher, David
collection PubMed
description To improve the outcome after autologous nerve grafting in the clinic, it is important to understand the limiting variables such as distinct phenotypes of motor and sensory Schwann cells. This study investigated the properties of phenotypically different autografts in a 6 mm femoral nerve defect model in the rat, where the respective femoral branches distally of the inguinal bifurcation served as homotopic, or heterotopic autografts. Axonal regeneration and target reinnervation was analyzed by gait analysis, electrophysiology, and wet muscle mass analysis. We evaluated regeneration-associated gene expression between 5 days and 10 weeks after repair, in the autografts as well as the proximal, and distal segments of the femoral nerve using qRT-PCR. Furthermore we investigated expression patterns of phenotypically pure ventral and dorsal roots. We identified highly significant differences in gene expression of a variety of regeneration-associated genes along the central – peripheral axis in healthy femoral nerves. Phenotypically mismatched grafting resulted in altered spatiotemporal expression of neurotrophic factor BDNF, GDNF receptor GFRα1, cell adhesion molecules Cadm3, Cadm4, L1CAM, and proliferation associated Ki67. Although significantly higher quadriceps muscle mass following homotopic nerve grafting was measured, we did not observe differences in gait analysis, and electrophysiological parameters between treatment paradigms. Our study provides evidence for phenotypic commitment of autologous nerve grafts after injury and gives a conclusive overview of temporal expression of several important regeneration-associated genes after repair with sensory or motor graft.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6519304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65193042019-05-28 Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat Hercher, David Kerbl, Markus Schuh, Christina M. A. P. Heinzel, Johannes Gal, László Stainer, Michaela Schmidhammer, Robert Hausner, Thomas Redl, Heinz Nógrádi, Antal Hacobian, Ara Front Cell Neurosci Neuroscience To improve the outcome after autologous nerve grafting in the clinic, it is important to understand the limiting variables such as distinct phenotypes of motor and sensory Schwann cells. This study investigated the properties of phenotypically different autografts in a 6 mm femoral nerve defect model in the rat, where the respective femoral branches distally of the inguinal bifurcation served as homotopic, or heterotopic autografts. Axonal regeneration and target reinnervation was analyzed by gait analysis, electrophysiology, and wet muscle mass analysis. We evaluated regeneration-associated gene expression between 5 days and 10 weeks after repair, in the autografts as well as the proximal, and distal segments of the femoral nerve using qRT-PCR. Furthermore we investigated expression patterns of phenotypically pure ventral and dorsal roots. We identified highly significant differences in gene expression of a variety of regeneration-associated genes along the central – peripheral axis in healthy femoral nerves. Phenotypically mismatched grafting resulted in altered spatiotemporal expression of neurotrophic factor BDNF, GDNF receptor GFRα1, cell adhesion molecules Cadm3, Cadm4, L1CAM, and proliferation associated Ki67. Although significantly higher quadriceps muscle mass following homotopic nerve grafting was measured, we did not observe differences in gait analysis, and electrophysiological parameters between treatment paradigms. Our study provides evidence for phenotypic commitment of autologous nerve grafts after injury and gives a conclusive overview of temporal expression of several important regeneration-associated genes after repair with sensory or motor graft. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6519304/ /pubmed/31139050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00182 Text en Copyright © 2019 Hercher, Kerbl, Schuh, Heinzel, Gal, Stainer, Schmidhammer, Hausner, Redl, Nógrádi and Hacobian. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Hercher, David
Kerbl, Markus
Schuh, Christina M. A. P.
Heinzel, Johannes
Gal, László
Stainer, Michaela
Schmidhammer, Robert
Hausner, Thomas
Redl, Heinz
Nógrádi, Antal
Hacobian, Ara
Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat
title Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat
title_full Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat
title_fullStr Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat
title_full_unstemmed Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat
title_short Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat
title_sort spatiotemporal differences in gene expression between motor and sensory autografts and their effect on femoral nerve regeneration in the rat
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31139050
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00182
work_keys_str_mv AT hercherdavid spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT kerblmarkus spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT schuhchristinamap spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT heinzeljohannes spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT gallaszlo spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT stainermichaela spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT schmidhammerrobert spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT hausnerthomas spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT redlheinz spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT nogradiantal spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT hacobianara spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat