Cargando…
Timings for HbA(1c) testing in people with diabetes are associated with incentive payments: an analysis of UK primary care data
AIMS: Guidelines recommend testing HbA(1c) every 3–6 months in people with diabetes. In the United Kingdom (UK), primary care clinics are financially incentivized to monitor HbA(1c) at least annually and report proportions of patients meeting targets on 31 March. We explored the hypothesis that this...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30175871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.13810 |
_version_ | 1783418628120510464 |
---|---|
author | Hirst, J. A. Farmer, A. J. Smith, M. C. Stevens, R. J. |
author_facet | Hirst, J. A. Farmer, A. J. Smith, M. C. Stevens, R. J. |
author_sort | Hirst, J. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Guidelines recommend testing HbA(1c) every 3–6 months in people with diabetes. In the United Kingdom (UK), primary care clinics are financially incentivized to monitor HbA(1c) at least annually and report proportions of patients meeting targets on 31 March. We explored the hypothesis that this reporting deadline may be associated with over‐frequent or delayed HbA(1c) testing. METHODS: This analysis used HbA(1c) results from 100 000 people with diabetes during 2005–2014 in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink UK primary care database. Logistic regression was used to explore whether the four months prior to the deadline for quality reporting (December to March) or individual's previous HbA(1c) were aligned with retesting HbA(1c) within 60 days or > 1 year from the previous test, and identify other factors associated with the timing of HbA(1c) testing. RESULTS: Retesting HbA(1c) within 60 days or > 1 year was more common in December to March compared with other months of the year (odds ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.04–1.08 for retesting within 60 days). Those with higher HbA(1c) were more likely to have a repeat test within 60 days and less likely to have a repeat test > 1 year from the previous test. CONCLUSIONS: We have found that retesting HbA(1c) within 60 days and > 1 year from the previous test was more common in December to March compared with the other months of the year. This work suggests that both practice‐centred administrative factors and patient‐centred considerations may be influencing diabetes care in the UK. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6519368 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65193682019-06-25 Timings for HbA(1c) testing in people with diabetes are associated with incentive payments: an analysis of UK primary care data Hirst, J. A. Farmer, A. J. Smith, M. C. Stevens, R. J. Diabet Med Research Articles AIMS: Guidelines recommend testing HbA(1c) every 3–6 months in people with diabetes. In the United Kingdom (UK), primary care clinics are financially incentivized to monitor HbA(1c) at least annually and report proportions of patients meeting targets on 31 March. We explored the hypothesis that this reporting deadline may be associated with over‐frequent or delayed HbA(1c) testing. METHODS: This analysis used HbA(1c) results from 100 000 people with diabetes during 2005–2014 in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink UK primary care database. Logistic regression was used to explore whether the four months prior to the deadline for quality reporting (December to March) or individual's previous HbA(1c) were aligned with retesting HbA(1c) within 60 days or > 1 year from the previous test, and identify other factors associated with the timing of HbA(1c) testing. RESULTS: Retesting HbA(1c) within 60 days or > 1 year was more common in December to March compared with other months of the year (odds ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.04–1.08 for retesting within 60 days). Those with higher HbA(1c) were more likely to have a repeat test within 60 days and less likely to have a repeat test > 1 year from the previous test. CONCLUSIONS: We have found that retesting HbA(1c) within 60 days and > 1 year from the previous test was more common in December to March compared with the other months of the year. This work suggests that both practice‐centred administrative factors and patient‐centred considerations may be influencing diabetes care in the UK. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-21 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6519368/ /pubmed/30175871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.13810 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Hirst, J. A. Farmer, A. J. Smith, M. C. Stevens, R. J. Timings for HbA(1c) testing in people with diabetes are associated with incentive payments: an analysis of UK primary care data |
title | Timings for HbA(1c) testing in people with diabetes are associated with incentive payments: an analysis of UK primary care data |
title_full | Timings for HbA(1c) testing in people with diabetes are associated with incentive payments: an analysis of UK primary care data |
title_fullStr | Timings for HbA(1c) testing in people with diabetes are associated with incentive payments: an analysis of UK primary care data |
title_full_unstemmed | Timings for HbA(1c) testing in people with diabetes are associated with incentive payments: an analysis of UK primary care data |
title_short | Timings for HbA(1c) testing in people with diabetes are associated with incentive payments: an analysis of UK primary care data |
title_sort | timings for hba(1c) testing in people with diabetes are associated with incentive payments: an analysis of uk primary care data |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30175871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.13810 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hirstja timingsforhba1ctestinginpeoplewithdiabetesareassociatedwithincentivepaymentsananalysisofukprimarycaredata AT farmeraj timingsforhba1ctestinginpeoplewithdiabetesareassociatedwithincentivepaymentsananalysisofukprimarycaredata AT smithmc timingsforhba1ctestinginpeoplewithdiabetesareassociatedwithincentivepaymentsananalysisofukprimarycaredata AT stevensrj timingsforhba1ctestinginpeoplewithdiabetesareassociatedwithincentivepaymentsananalysisofukprimarycaredata |