Cargando…

Ecology of sound communication in fishes

Fishes communicate acoustically under ecological constraints which may modify or hinder signal transmission and detection and may also be risky. This makes it important to know if and to what degree fishes can modify acoustic signalling when key ecological factors—predation pressure, noise and ambie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ladich, Friedrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31130820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/faf.12368
_version_ 1783418629047451648
author Ladich, Friedrich
author_facet Ladich, Friedrich
author_sort Ladich, Friedrich
collection PubMed
description Fishes communicate acoustically under ecological constraints which may modify or hinder signal transmission and detection and may also be risky. This makes it important to know if and to what degree fishes can modify acoustic signalling when key ecological factors—predation pressure, noise and ambient temperature—vary. This paper reviews short‐time effects of the first two factors; the third has been reviewed recently (Ladich, 2018). Numerous studies have investigated the effects of predators on fish behaviour, but only a few report changes in calling activity when hearing predator calls as demonstrated when fish responded to played‐back dolphin sounds. Furthermore, swimming sounds of schooling fish may affect predators. Our knowledge on adaptations to natural changes in ambient noise, for example caused by wind or migration between quiet and noisier habitats, is limited. Hearing abilities decrease when ambient noise levels increase (termed masking), in particular in taxa possessing enhanced hearing abilities. High natural and anthropogenic noise regimes, for example vessel noise, alter calling activity in the field and laboratory. Increases in sound pressure levels (Lombard effect) and altered temporal call patterns were also observed, but no switches to higher sound frequencies. In summary, effects of predator calls and noise on sound communication are described in fishes, yet sparsely in contrast to songbirds or whales. Major gaps in our knowledge on potential negative effects of noise on acoustic communication call for more detailed investigation because fishes are keystone species in many aquatic habitats and constitute a major source of protein for humans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6519373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65193732019-05-23 Ecology of sound communication in fishes Ladich, Friedrich Fish Fish (Oxf) Original Articles Fishes communicate acoustically under ecological constraints which may modify or hinder signal transmission and detection and may also be risky. This makes it important to know if and to what degree fishes can modify acoustic signalling when key ecological factors—predation pressure, noise and ambient temperature—vary. This paper reviews short‐time effects of the first two factors; the third has been reviewed recently (Ladich, 2018). Numerous studies have investigated the effects of predators on fish behaviour, but only a few report changes in calling activity when hearing predator calls as demonstrated when fish responded to played‐back dolphin sounds. Furthermore, swimming sounds of schooling fish may affect predators. Our knowledge on adaptations to natural changes in ambient noise, for example caused by wind or migration between quiet and noisier habitats, is limited. Hearing abilities decrease when ambient noise levels increase (termed masking), in particular in taxa possessing enhanced hearing abilities. High natural and anthropogenic noise regimes, for example vessel noise, alter calling activity in the field and laboratory. Increases in sound pressure levels (Lombard effect) and altered temporal call patterns were also observed, but no switches to higher sound frequencies. In summary, effects of predator calls and noise on sound communication are described in fishes, yet sparsely in contrast to songbirds or whales. Major gaps in our knowledge on potential negative effects of noise on acoustic communication call for more detailed investigation because fishes are keystone species in many aquatic habitats and constitute a major source of protein for humans. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-08 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6519373/ /pubmed/31130820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/faf.12368 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Fish and Fisheries published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ladich, Friedrich
Ecology of sound communication in fishes
title Ecology of sound communication in fishes
title_full Ecology of sound communication in fishes
title_fullStr Ecology of sound communication in fishes
title_full_unstemmed Ecology of sound communication in fishes
title_short Ecology of sound communication in fishes
title_sort ecology of sound communication in fishes
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31130820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/faf.12368
work_keys_str_mv AT ladichfriedrich ecologyofsoundcommunicationinfishes