Cargando…

The Methods of PH WINS 2017: Approaches to Refreshing Nationally Representative State-Level Estimates and Creating Nationally Representative Local-Level Estimates of Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs

CONTEXT: The Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS) was first fielded in 2014 and is the largest public health workforce survey in the nation. This article elucidates the methods used for the 2017 PH WINS fielding. PROGRAM OR POLICY: PH WINS was fielded to a nationally represen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leider, Jonathon P., Pineau, Vicki, Bogaert, Kyle, Ma, Qiao, Sellers, Katie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30720617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000900
_version_ 1783418661573230592
author Leider, Jonathon P.
Pineau, Vicki
Bogaert, Kyle
Ma, Qiao
Sellers, Katie
author_facet Leider, Jonathon P.
Pineau, Vicki
Bogaert, Kyle
Ma, Qiao
Sellers, Katie
author_sort Leider, Jonathon P.
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: The Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS) was first fielded in 2014 and is the largest public health workforce survey in the nation. This article elucidates the methods used for the 2017 PH WINS fielding. PROGRAM OR POLICY: PH WINS was fielded to a nationally representative sample of State Health Agency Central Office (SHA-CO) staff, as well as local health department (LHD) staff. The instrument largely mirrored 2014, though the training needs section was revised, and a validated item measuring burnout in staff was added. IMPLEMENTATION: Staff lists were collected directly from all participating state and local agencies. Forty-seven state health agencies (SHAs), 26 large LHDs, and 71 midsize LHDs participated. All SHAs were surveyed using a census approach. The nationally representative SHA-CO frame is representative of all central office staff members. The nationally representative local frame was a complex survey design, wherein staff from LHDs were randomly sampled across 20 strata, based on agency size and geographic region. Staff were also contributed with certainty from large LHDs in nondecentralized states. The frame is representative of staff at LHDs serving more than 25 000 people and with 25 or more staff members. Other LHDs are excluded, and so PH WINS is not representative of smaller LHDs. Balanced repeated replication weights were used to adjust variance estimates for the complex design. EVALUATION: Overall, 47 604 people responded to PH WINS in 2017 across all frames. PH WINS 2017 achieved a response rate of 48%. The design effect for the SHA-CO frame was 1.46 and was 16.42 for the local frame. DISCUSSION: PH WINS now offers a nationally representative sample of both SHA-CO and LHD staff across 4 major domains: workplace environment, training needs, emerging concepts in public health, and demographics. Both practice and academia can use PH WINS to better understand the perceptions and needs of staff, address training gaps, and work to recruit and retain quality staff.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6519781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65197812019-07-22 The Methods of PH WINS 2017: Approaches to Refreshing Nationally Representative State-Level Estimates and Creating Nationally Representative Local-Level Estimates of Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Leider, Jonathon P. Pineau, Vicki Bogaert, Kyle Ma, Qiao Sellers, Katie J Public Health Manag Pract Research Reports CONTEXT: The Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS) was first fielded in 2014 and is the largest public health workforce survey in the nation. This article elucidates the methods used for the 2017 PH WINS fielding. PROGRAM OR POLICY: PH WINS was fielded to a nationally representative sample of State Health Agency Central Office (SHA-CO) staff, as well as local health department (LHD) staff. The instrument largely mirrored 2014, though the training needs section was revised, and a validated item measuring burnout in staff was added. IMPLEMENTATION: Staff lists were collected directly from all participating state and local agencies. Forty-seven state health agencies (SHAs), 26 large LHDs, and 71 midsize LHDs participated. All SHAs were surveyed using a census approach. The nationally representative SHA-CO frame is representative of all central office staff members. The nationally representative local frame was a complex survey design, wherein staff from LHDs were randomly sampled across 20 strata, based on agency size and geographic region. Staff were also contributed with certainty from large LHDs in nondecentralized states. The frame is representative of staff at LHDs serving more than 25 000 people and with 25 or more staff members. Other LHDs are excluded, and so PH WINS is not representative of smaller LHDs. Balanced repeated replication weights were used to adjust variance estimates for the complex design. EVALUATION: Overall, 47 604 people responded to PH WINS in 2017 across all frames. PH WINS 2017 achieved a response rate of 48%. The design effect for the SHA-CO frame was 1.46 and was 16.42 for the local frame. DISCUSSION: PH WINS now offers a nationally representative sample of both SHA-CO and LHD staff across 4 major domains: workplace environment, training needs, emerging concepts in public health, and demographics. Both practice and academia can use PH WINS to better understand the perceptions and needs of staff, address training gaps, and work to recruit and retain quality staff. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2019-03 2019-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6519781/ /pubmed/30720617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000900 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Leider, Jonathon P.
Pineau, Vicki
Bogaert, Kyle
Ma, Qiao
Sellers, Katie
The Methods of PH WINS 2017: Approaches to Refreshing Nationally Representative State-Level Estimates and Creating Nationally Representative Local-Level Estimates of Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs
title The Methods of PH WINS 2017: Approaches to Refreshing Nationally Representative State-Level Estimates and Creating Nationally Representative Local-Level Estimates of Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs
title_full The Methods of PH WINS 2017: Approaches to Refreshing Nationally Representative State-Level Estimates and Creating Nationally Representative Local-Level Estimates of Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs
title_fullStr The Methods of PH WINS 2017: Approaches to Refreshing Nationally Representative State-Level Estimates and Creating Nationally Representative Local-Level Estimates of Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs
title_full_unstemmed The Methods of PH WINS 2017: Approaches to Refreshing Nationally Representative State-Level Estimates and Creating Nationally Representative Local-Level Estimates of Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs
title_short The Methods of PH WINS 2017: Approaches to Refreshing Nationally Representative State-Level Estimates and Creating Nationally Representative Local-Level Estimates of Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs
title_sort methods of ph wins 2017: approaches to refreshing nationally representative state-level estimates and creating nationally representative local-level estimates of public health workforce interests and needs
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30720617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000900
work_keys_str_mv AT leiderjonathonp themethodsofphwins2017approachestorefreshingnationallyrepresentativestatelevelestimatesandcreatingnationallyrepresentativelocallevelestimatesofpublichealthworkforceinterestsandneeds
AT pineauvicki themethodsofphwins2017approachestorefreshingnationallyrepresentativestatelevelestimatesandcreatingnationallyrepresentativelocallevelestimatesofpublichealthworkforceinterestsandneeds
AT bogaertkyle themethodsofphwins2017approachestorefreshingnationallyrepresentativestatelevelestimatesandcreatingnationallyrepresentativelocallevelestimatesofpublichealthworkforceinterestsandneeds
AT maqiao themethodsofphwins2017approachestorefreshingnationallyrepresentativestatelevelestimatesandcreatingnationallyrepresentativelocallevelestimatesofpublichealthworkforceinterestsandneeds
AT sellerskatie themethodsofphwins2017approachestorefreshingnationallyrepresentativestatelevelestimatesandcreatingnationallyrepresentativelocallevelestimatesofpublichealthworkforceinterestsandneeds
AT leiderjonathonp methodsofphwins2017approachestorefreshingnationallyrepresentativestatelevelestimatesandcreatingnationallyrepresentativelocallevelestimatesofpublichealthworkforceinterestsandneeds
AT pineauvicki methodsofphwins2017approachestorefreshingnationallyrepresentativestatelevelestimatesandcreatingnationallyrepresentativelocallevelestimatesofpublichealthworkforceinterestsandneeds
AT bogaertkyle methodsofphwins2017approachestorefreshingnationallyrepresentativestatelevelestimatesandcreatingnationallyrepresentativelocallevelestimatesofpublichealthworkforceinterestsandneeds
AT maqiao methodsofphwins2017approachestorefreshingnationallyrepresentativestatelevelestimatesandcreatingnationallyrepresentativelocallevelestimatesofpublichealthworkforceinterestsandneeds
AT sellerskatie methodsofphwins2017approachestorefreshingnationallyrepresentativestatelevelestimatesandcreatingnationallyrepresentativelocallevelestimatesofpublichealthworkforceinterestsandneeds