Cargando…

Quality dimensions features for identifying high-quality user replies in text forum threads using classification methods

The Text Forum Threads (TFThs) contain a large amount of Initial-Posts Replies pairs (IPR pairs) which are related to information exchange and discussion amongst the forum users with similar interests. Generally, some user replies in the discussion thread are off-topic and irrelevant. Hence, the con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osman, Akram, Salim, Naomie, Saeed, Faisal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31091242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215516
_version_ 1783418674058625024
author Osman, Akram
Salim, Naomie
Saeed, Faisal
author_facet Osman, Akram
Salim, Naomie
Saeed, Faisal
author_sort Osman, Akram
collection PubMed
description The Text Forum Threads (TFThs) contain a large amount of Initial-Posts Replies pairs (IPR pairs) which are related to information exchange and discussion amongst the forum users with similar interests. Generally, some user replies in the discussion thread are off-topic and irrelevant. Hence, the content is of different qualities. It is important to identify the quality of the IPR pairs in a discussion thread in order to extract relevant information and helpful replies because a higher frequency of irrelevant replies in the thread could take the discussion in a different direction and the genuine users would lose interest in this discussion thread. In this study, the authors have presented an approach for identifying the high-quality user replies to the Initial-Post and use some quality dimensions features for their extraction. Moreover, crowdsourcing platforms were used for judging the quality of the replies and classified them into high-quality, low-quality or non-quality replies to the Initial-Posts. Then, the high-quality IPR pairs were extracted and identified based on their quality, and they were ranked using three classifiers i.e., Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes, and the Decision Trees according to their quality dimensions of relevancy, author activeness, timeliness, ease-of-understanding, politeness, and amount-of-data. In conclusion, the experimental results for the TFThs showed that the proposed approach could improve the extraction of the quality replies and identify the quality features that can be used for the Text Forum Thread Summarization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6519834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65198342019-05-31 Quality dimensions features for identifying high-quality user replies in text forum threads using classification methods Osman, Akram Salim, Naomie Saeed, Faisal PLoS One Research Article The Text Forum Threads (TFThs) contain a large amount of Initial-Posts Replies pairs (IPR pairs) which are related to information exchange and discussion amongst the forum users with similar interests. Generally, some user replies in the discussion thread are off-topic and irrelevant. Hence, the content is of different qualities. It is important to identify the quality of the IPR pairs in a discussion thread in order to extract relevant information and helpful replies because a higher frequency of irrelevant replies in the thread could take the discussion in a different direction and the genuine users would lose interest in this discussion thread. In this study, the authors have presented an approach for identifying the high-quality user replies to the Initial-Post and use some quality dimensions features for their extraction. Moreover, crowdsourcing platforms were used for judging the quality of the replies and classified them into high-quality, low-quality or non-quality replies to the Initial-Posts. Then, the high-quality IPR pairs were extracted and identified based on their quality, and they were ranked using three classifiers i.e., Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes, and the Decision Trees according to their quality dimensions of relevancy, author activeness, timeliness, ease-of-understanding, politeness, and amount-of-data. In conclusion, the experimental results for the TFThs showed that the proposed approach could improve the extraction of the quality replies and identify the quality features that can be used for the Text Forum Thread Summarization. Public Library of Science 2019-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6519834/ /pubmed/31091242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215516 Text en © 2019 Osman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Osman, Akram
Salim, Naomie
Saeed, Faisal
Quality dimensions features for identifying high-quality user replies in text forum threads using classification methods
title Quality dimensions features for identifying high-quality user replies in text forum threads using classification methods
title_full Quality dimensions features for identifying high-quality user replies in text forum threads using classification methods
title_fullStr Quality dimensions features for identifying high-quality user replies in text forum threads using classification methods
title_full_unstemmed Quality dimensions features for identifying high-quality user replies in text forum threads using classification methods
title_short Quality dimensions features for identifying high-quality user replies in text forum threads using classification methods
title_sort quality dimensions features for identifying high-quality user replies in text forum threads using classification methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6519834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31091242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215516
work_keys_str_mv AT osmanakram qualitydimensionsfeaturesforidentifyinghighqualityuserrepliesintextforumthreadsusingclassificationmethods
AT salimnaomie qualitydimensionsfeaturesforidentifyinghighqualityuserrepliesintextforumthreadsusingclassificationmethods
AT saeedfaisal qualitydimensionsfeaturesforidentifyinghighqualityuserrepliesintextforumthreadsusingclassificationmethods