Cargando…
Segmental differences of cervical spinal cord motion: advancing from confounders to a diagnostic tool
Increased cranio-caudal spinal cord motion is associated with clinical impairment in degenerative cervical myelopathy. However, whether spinal cord motion holds potential as a neuroimaging biomarker requires further validation. Different confounders (i.e. subject characteristics, methodological prob...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31092891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43908-x |
_version_ | 1783418730176315392 |
---|---|
author | Hupp, M. Vallotton, K. Brockmann, C. Huwyler, S. Rosner, J. Sutter, R. Klarhoefer, M. Freund, P. Farshad, M. Curt, A. |
author_facet | Hupp, M. Vallotton, K. Brockmann, C. Huwyler, S. Rosner, J. Sutter, R. Klarhoefer, M. Freund, P. Farshad, M. Curt, A. |
author_sort | Hupp, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Increased cranio-caudal spinal cord motion is associated with clinical impairment in degenerative cervical myelopathy. However, whether spinal cord motion holds potential as a neuroimaging biomarker requires further validation. Different confounders (i.e. subject characteristics, methodological problems such as phase drift, etc.) on spinal cord motion readouts have to be considered. Twenty-two healthy subjects underwent phase contrast MRI, a subset of subjects (N = 9) had repeated scans. Parameters of interest included amplitude of velocity signal, maximum cranial respectively maximum caudal velocity, displacement (=area under curve of the velocity signal). The cervical spinal cord showed pulse synchronic oscillatory motions with significant differences in all readouts across cervical segments, with a maximum at C5. The Inter-rater reliability was excellent for all readouts. The test-retest reliability was excellent for all parameters at C2 to C6, but not for maximum cranial velocity at C6 and all readouts at C7. Spinal cord motion was correlated with spinal canal size, heart rate and body size. This is the first study to propose a standardized MRI measurement of spinal cord motion for further clinical implementation based on satisfactory phase drift correction and excellent reliability. Understanding the influence of confounders (e.g. structural conditions of the spine) is essential for introducing cord motion into the diagnostic work up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6520379 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65203792019-05-28 Segmental differences of cervical spinal cord motion: advancing from confounders to a diagnostic tool Hupp, M. Vallotton, K. Brockmann, C. Huwyler, S. Rosner, J. Sutter, R. Klarhoefer, M. Freund, P. Farshad, M. Curt, A. Sci Rep Article Increased cranio-caudal spinal cord motion is associated with clinical impairment in degenerative cervical myelopathy. However, whether spinal cord motion holds potential as a neuroimaging biomarker requires further validation. Different confounders (i.e. subject characteristics, methodological problems such as phase drift, etc.) on spinal cord motion readouts have to be considered. Twenty-two healthy subjects underwent phase contrast MRI, a subset of subjects (N = 9) had repeated scans. Parameters of interest included amplitude of velocity signal, maximum cranial respectively maximum caudal velocity, displacement (=area under curve of the velocity signal). The cervical spinal cord showed pulse synchronic oscillatory motions with significant differences in all readouts across cervical segments, with a maximum at C5. The Inter-rater reliability was excellent for all readouts. The test-retest reliability was excellent for all parameters at C2 to C6, but not for maximum cranial velocity at C6 and all readouts at C7. Spinal cord motion was correlated with spinal canal size, heart rate and body size. This is the first study to propose a standardized MRI measurement of spinal cord motion for further clinical implementation based on satisfactory phase drift correction and excellent reliability. Understanding the influence of confounders (e.g. structural conditions of the spine) is essential for introducing cord motion into the diagnostic work up. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6520379/ /pubmed/31092891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43908-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Hupp, M. Vallotton, K. Brockmann, C. Huwyler, S. Rosner, J. Sutter, R. Klarhoefer, M. Freund, P. Farshad, M. Curt, A. Segmental differences of cervical spinal cord motion: advancing from confounders to a diagnostic tool |
title | Segmental differences of cervical spinal cord motion: advancing from confounders to a diagnostic tool |
title_full | Segmental differences of cervical spinal cord motion: advancing from confounders to a diagnostic tool |
title_fullStr | Segmental differences of cervical spinal cord motion: advancing from confounders to a diagnostic tool |
title_full_unstemmed | Segmental differences of cervical spinal cord motion: advancing from confounders to a diagnostic tool |
title_short | Segmental differences of cervical spinal cord motion: advancing from confounders to a diagnostic tool |
title_sort | segmental differences of cervical spinal cord motion: advancing from confounders to a diagnostic tool |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31092891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43908-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huppm segmentaldifferencesofcervicalspinalcordmotionadvancingfromconfounderstoadiagnostictool AT vallottonk segmentaldifferencesofcervicalspinalcordmotionadvancingfromconfounderstoadiagnostictool AT brockmannc segmentaldifferencesofcervicalspinalcordmotionadvancingfromconfounderstoadiagnostictool AT huwylers segmentaldifferencesofcervicalspinalcordmotionadvancingfromconfounderstoadiagnostictool AT rosnerj segmentaldifferencesofcervicalspinalcordmotionadvancingfromconfounderstoadiagnostictool AT sutterr segmentaldifferencesofcervicalspinalcordmotionadvancingfromconfounderstoadiagnostictool AT klarhoeferm segmentaldifferencesofcervicalspinalcordmotionadvancingfromconfounderstoadiagnostictool AT freundp segmentaldifferencesofcervicalspinalcordmotionadvancingfromconfounderstoadiagnostictool AT farshadm segmentaldifferencesofcervicalspinalcordmotionadvancingfromconfounderstoadiagnostictool AT curta segmentaldifferencesofcervicalspinalcordmotionadvancingfromconfounderstoadiagnostictool |