Cargando…

Campylobacter culture fails to correctly detect Campylobacter in 30% of positive patient stool specimens compared to non-cultural methods

Campylobacter diagnosis is hampered because many laboratories continue to use traditional stool culture, which is slow and suffers false-negative results. This large multi-site study used a composite reference method consisting of a new FDA-cleared immunoassay and four molecular techniques to compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buss, Janice E., Cresse, Michelle, Doyle, Susan, Buchan, Blake W., Craft, David W., Young, Steve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30783889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03499-x
_version_ 1783418746970308608
author Buss, Janice E.
Cresse, Michelle
Doyle, Susan
Buchan, Blake W.
Craft, David W.
Young, Steve
author_facet Buss, Janice E.
Cresse, Michelle
Doyle, Susan
Buchan, Blake W.
Craft, David W.
Young, Steve
author_sort Buss, Janice E.
collection PubMed
description Campylobacter diagnosis is hampered because many laboratories continue to use traditional stool culture, which is slow and suffers false-negative results. This large multi-site study used a composite reference method consisting of a new FDA-cleared immunoassay and four molecular techniques to compare to culture. Prospectively collected patient fecal specimens (1552) were first preliminarily categorized as positive or negative by traditional culture. All specimens were also tested by EIA, and any EIA-positive or culture-discrepant results were further characterized by 16S rRNA qPCR, eight species-specific PCR assays, bidirectional sequencing, and an FDA-cleared multiplex PCR panel. The five non-culture methods showed complete agreement on all positive and discrepant specimens which were then assigned as true-positive or true-negative specimens. Among 47 true-positive specimens, culture incorrectly identified 13 (28%) as negative, and 1 true-negative specimen as positive, for a sensitivity of 72.3%. Unexpectedly, among the true-positive specimens, 4 (8%) were the pathogenic species C. upsaliensis. Culture had a 30% false result rate compared to immunoassay and molecular methods. More accurate results lead to better diagnosis and treatment of suspected campylobacteriosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6520473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65204732019-06-05 Campylobacter culture fails to correctly detect Campylobacter in 30% of positive patient stool specimens compared to non-cultural methods Buss, Janice E. Cresse, Michelle Doyle, Susan Buchan, Blake W. Craft, David W. Young, Steve Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article Campylobacter diagnosis is hampered because many laboratories continue to use traditional stool culture, which is slow and suffers false-negative results. This large multi-site study used a composite reference method consisting of a new FDA-cleared immunoassay and four molecular techniques to compare to culture. Prospectively collected patient fecal specimens (1552) were first preliminarily categorized as positive or negative by traditional culture. All specimens were also tested by EIA, and any EIA-positive or culture-discrepant results were further characterized by 16S rRNA qPCR, eight species-specific PCR assays, bidirectional sequencing, and an FDA-cleared multiplex PCR panel. The five non-culture methods showed complete agreement on all positive and discrepant specimens which were then assigned as true-positive or true-negative specimens. Among 47 true-positive specimens, culture incorrectly identified 13 (28%) as negative, and 1 true-negative specimen as positive, for a sensitivity of 72.3%. Unexpectedly, among the true-positive specimens, 4 (8%) were the pathogenic species C. upsaliensis. Culture had a 30% false result rate compared to immunoassay and molecular methods. More accurate results lead to better diagnosis and treatment of suspected campylobacteriosis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-02-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6520473/ /pubmed/30783889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03499-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Buss, Janice E.
Cresse, Michelle
Doyle, Susan
Buchan, Blake W.
Craft, David W.
Young, Steve
Campylobacter culture fails to correctly detect Campylobacter in 30% of positive patient stool specimens compared to non-cultural methods
title Campylobacter culture fails to correctly detect Campylobacter in 30% of positive patient stool specimens compared to non-cultural methods
title_full Campylobacter culture fails to correctly detect Campylobacter in 30% of positive patient stool specimens compared to non-cultural methods
title_fullStr Campylobacter culture fails to correctly detect Campylobacter in 30% of positive patient stool specimens compared to non-cultural methods
title_full_unstemmed Campylobacter culture fails to correctly detect Campylobacter in 30% of positive patient stool specimens compared to non-cultural methods
title_short Campylobacter culture fails to correctly detect Campylobacter in 30% of positive patient stool specimens compared to non-cultural methods
title_sort campylobacter culture fails to correctly detect campylobacter in 30% of positive patient stool specimens compared to non-cultural methods
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30783889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03499-x
work_keys_str_mv AT bussjanicee campylobacterculturefailstocorrectlydetectcampylobacterin30ofpositivepatientstoolspecimenscomparedtononculturalmethods
AT cressemichelle campylobacterculturefailstocorrectlydetectcampylobacterin30ofpositivepatientstoolspecimenscomparedtononculturalmethods
AT doylesusan campylobacterculturefailstocorrectlydetectcampylobacterin30ofpositivepatientstoolspecimenscomparedtononculturalmethods
AT buchanblakew campylobacterculturefailstocorrectlydetectcampylobacterin30ofpositivepatientstoolspecimenscomparedtononculturalmethods
AT craftdavidw campylobacterculturefailstocorrectlydetectcampylobacterin30ofpositivepatientstoolspecimenscomparedtononculturalmethods
AT youngsteve campylobacterculturefailstocorrectlydetectcampylobacterin30ofpositivepatientstoolspecimenscomparedtononculturalmethods